Senate Letter To Admin On 45V Hydrogen PTC

November 6, 2023
Secretary Janet Yellen

U.S. Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20220
Secretary Jennifer Granholm

U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20585
Mr. John Podesta

Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor to the President for Clean Energy
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20220
Re: Implementation of the Section 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit
Dear Secretary Yellen, Secretary Granholm, and Mr. Podesta:
We write to ensure that the upcoming guidance for the Internal Revenue Code Section 45V
Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit (45V) is consistent with our intent to provide a robust
and flexible incentive that will catalyze and quickly scale a domestic hydrogen economy. The
historic Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is projected by 2030 to cut Americans’ energy costs by
$200 - $1,000 annually and greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent.i,ii,iii As a key component of
the IRA, we are counting on the 45V credit to catalyze production of enough domestically-
produced clean hydrogen to affordably and meaningfully lower emissions in hard to decarbonize
sectors.
The success of the new Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub Program in hard to decarbonize sectors
will also likely be contingent on robust and flexible 45V hydrogen production tax credit
guidance. The Inflation Reduction Act already includes a scalable carbon-intensity framework
that requires significant emission reductions compared to most existing hydrogen production
facilities. As the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completes its work, we hope the final guidance
will avoid evolving and complex eligibility criteria—such as overly stringent additionality,
deliverability, and time matching requirements—that could raise costs, suppress hydrogen
production, feedstock and production pathway innovation, and private-sector investment, while
discriminating against some regions based on their existing clean energy mixes.iv,v,vi As one
example, the Washington State Department of Commerce stated in their July 14, 2023, comment
letter to the IRS, “The suggested additionality restrictions are not only unnecessary in a statutory
clean energy state such as Washington, they would also complicate the development of
electrolytic hydrogen production in such states.”
Page 2
These requirements may also significantly delay the construction and operational start for clean
hydrogen projects as a result of interconnection queue delays.vii In the long term, this may
hamper the development of a robust clean hydrogen market, undermine volumetric production
and price-parity goals, reduce the positive effects of scaling up electrolyzer investment, and
prevent clean hydrogen from fulfilling vital roles in hard to decarbonize sectors in line with the
Administration’s broader decarbonization efforts.viii
45V was intended to be technology-agnostic and clearly states that GHG lifecycle assessments
(LCA) should be determined using the well-established GREET model through the point of
production.ix Furthermore, while 45V allows for “a successor model (as determined by the
Secretary),” this additional flexibility was included as a safeguard in the unlikely event the
GREET model was no longer available at some future date and should not be interpreted as a
license to create a new LCA model or additional regulatory prescriptions.
We also believe that Congress was clear that 45V should allow applicants to utilize indirect book
accounting factors, such as energy attribute certificates, renewable electricity and carbon-
negative gas credits, and power purchase agreements when determining project eligibility for the
tax credit. This was a point that our colleagues Senate Finance Committee Chairman Wyden and
Senate Environment and Public Works Chairman Carper made in a Senate floor colloquy on
August 6, 2022.x While some restrictions may be warranted to limit unintended consequences,
generally these established market mechanisms can serve as an important tool to limit
discrimination between new and existing energy sources, maintain system integrity, and allow
for robust hydrogen production from the variety of power sources available across every region
of our country.
Through this ten-year tax credit and the appropriation of billions of dollars in the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act, Congress has provided an unprecedented level of support for the
scaling of hydrogen production infrastructure—showing a strong commitment to growing
hydrogen’s share of the U.S. clean energy portfolio, and creating a meaningful opportunity to
boost domestic energy production, lower emissions, and revitalize communities.xi Overly
prescriptive guidance could prevent the growth and certainty needed for clean hydrogen to
provide meaningful alternatives for difficult to decarbonize sectors, reach competitive hydrogen
market prices, and realize the more than 100,000 new jobs the Energy Department projects the
clean hydrogen industry could create by 2030.xii
Thank you for your leadership and thoughtful consideration of this matter. We urge you to issue
timely technical guidance that will ensure the 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit plays
a pivotal role in reducing emissions, providing for our national security, and creating good-
paying union jobs.
Sincerely,
Page 3
Maria Cantwell Sherrod Brown Joe Manchin III

United States Senator United States Senator United States Senator
Richard J. Durbin Kirsten Gillibrand Patty Murray

John Fetterman Tammy Duckworth Kyrsten Sinema

Robert P. Casey, Jr. Gary C. Peters

United States Senator United States Senator
i
“The Inflation Reduction Act Drives Significant Emissions Reductions and Positions America to Reach Our Climate
Goals,” Department of Energy Office of Policy. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-
08/8.18%20InflationReductionAct_Factsheet_Final.pdf.
ii
“A Congressional Climate Breakthrough,” July 28, 2022, Rhodium Group. https://rhg.com/research/inflation-reduction-
act.
iii
“Retail Electricity Rates under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,” August 3, 2022, Resources for the Future.
https://www.rff.org/publications/issue-briefs/retail-electricity-rates-under-the-inflation-reduction-act-of-2022.
iv
Anna Cybulsky, Michael Giovannielo, Tim Schittekatte, and Dharik S. Mallapragada. April 2023. “Producing hydrogen
from electricity: how modeling additionality drives the emissions impact of time-matching requirements.” Working paper,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative. https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/MITEI-WP-
2023-02.pdf.
v
“Green Hydrogen: What the Inflation Reduction Act Means for Production Economics and Carbon Intensity,” Wood
Mackenzie, March 14, 2023, https://www.woodmac.com/news/opinion/green-hydrogen-IRA-production-economics/#form.
vi
1. Analysis of Hourly & Annual GHG Emissions: Accounting for Hydrogen Production, April 2023, https://acore.org/wp-
content/uploads/2023/04/ACORE-and-E3-Analysis-of-Hourly-and-Annual-GHG-Emissions-Accounting-for-Hydrogen-
Production.pdf.
vii
“Queued up: Characteristics of Power Plants Seeking Transmission Interconnection,” Queued Up: Characteristics of
Power Plants Seeking Transmission Interconnection | Electricity Markets and Policy Group, April 6, 2023,
https://emp.lbl.gov/queues.
viii
United States Department of State and the United States Executive Office of the President. (2021). The Long-Term
Strategy of the United States: Pathways to Net-Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-
content/uploads/2021/10/US-Long-Term-Strategy.pdf; U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). DOE National Clean Hydrogen
Strategy and Roadmap. https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/docs/hydrogenprogramlibraries/pdfs/us-national-clean-hydrogen-
strategy-roadmap.pdf; The first Energy Earthshot—Hydrogen Shot—seeks to reduce the cost of clean hydrogen by 80% to
$1 per 1 kilogram in 1 decade ("1 1 1"). Source: Energy.gov. (2021). Hydrogen Shot.
https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-shot; U.S. Department of Energy. (2023). U.S. DOE Pathways to
Commercial Liftoff: Clean Hydrogen. https://liftoff.energy.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/20230523-Pathways-to-
Commercial-Liftoff-Clean-Hydrogen.pdf; U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). U.S. DOE Industrial Decarbonization
Roadmap. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/Industrial%20Decarbonization%20Roadmap.pdf.; U.S.
Department of Energy. (2023). The U.S. National Blueprint for Transportation Decarbonization.
https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/the-us-national-blueprint-for-transportation-decarbonization.pdf.
ix
26 U.S.C. §45V(C)(1)(B).
x
133 Cong. Rec. S4165-S4166 (2022) (Senators Carper and Wyden, speaking on H.R.5376).
xi
42 U.S.C. §16154; 42 U.S.C. §16161a; 42 U.S.C. §16161b; 42 U.S.C. §16161c; 42 U.S.C. §16161d; P.L. 117-58
Division J.
xii
U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). DOE National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap.
https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/docs/hydrogenprogramlibraries/pdfs/us-national-clean-hydrogen-strategy-roadmap.pdf.

Senate Letter To Admin On 45V Hydrogen PTC

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Senate Letter To Admin On 45V Hydrogen PTC

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

November 6, 2023

Secretary Janet Yellen

Secretary Jennifer Granholm

Mr. John Podesta

Dear Secretary Yellen, Secretary Granholm, and Mr. Podesta:

Maria Cantwell Sherrod Brown Joe Manchin III

Richard J. Durbin Kirsten Gillibrand Patty Murray

John Fetterman Tammy Duckworth Kyrsten Sinema

Robert P. Casey, Jr. Gary C. Peters

You might also like