Next Article in Journal
Mineral Reaction Kinetics during Aciding of the Gaoyuzhuang Carbonate Geothermal Reservoir in the Xiong’an New Area, Northern China
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Changes in the Ark Clam (Anadara kagoshimensis) Is Associated with Phytoplankton Community Patterns in a Temperate Coastal Embayment
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of Flow Structure and Turbulence Characteristic around a Spur Dike Using Large-Eddy Simulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recovery of Macrobenthic Food Web on Rocky Shores Following the Hebei Spirit Oil Spill as Revealed by C and N Stable Isotopes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Feeding Ecology of Common Squid Todarodes pacificus in the South Sea of Korea Determined through Stable Isotope and Stomach Content Analyses

1
Fisheries Resources Research Center, National Institute of Fisheries Science, Tongyeong 53064, Korea
2
Department of Marine Ecology and Environment, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea
3
Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Water 2022, 14(19), 3159; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193159
Submission received: 4 August 2022 / Revised: 26 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 7 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Stable Isotopes in Marine Ecosystems)

Abstract

:
The common squid Todarodes pacificus is a dominant species within epipelagic communities and an important commercial species in the South and East seas of Korea and in the East China Sea. In this study, to examine the dietary composition, trophic position, and ontogenetic dietary shifts of the common squid, we analyzed stomach contents and stable isotope values (δ13C and δ15N) in muscle tissue across different body sizes (mantle length, ML) and seasons (winter, spring, and summer 2021) in the South Sea of Korea. Regardless of the season, the diet of the common squid predominantly comprised Pisces (37.9–94.0%) and Cephalopoda (6.0–61.0%). However, in the smallest individuals (ML < 10 cm), the stomach contents in August primarily comprised Crustacea (95.5%), thereby indicating a seasonal difference in dietary composition and ontogenetic dietary shifts only during summer. Similarly, our isotope results revealed seasonal isotopic variation among sampling periods and significant positive correlations between ML and both δ13C and δ15N values during the summer. These results reveal a seasonal variability in major diet components among the common squid of different size classes and that their feeding strategies are probably adjusted in response to the temporal availability of prey. Collectively, the findings of this study enhance our understanding of the feeding ecology of T. pacificus and thereby provide valuable information that will contribute to the ecological fishery management of this commercially important species.

1. Introduction

Squid, which are widely distributed throughout most marine systems worldwide, comprise approximately 300 species characterized by pronounced differences in biological and ecological traits and habitat preferences [1,2]. In general, squid are ecologically important organisms in marine communities, within which they constitute a predominant group, owing to their high biomass, and represent a major prey resource for marine predators, including fishes, seabirds, and mammals [1,3]. Squid are active predators that feed on a diverse range of prey types, including zooplankton, crustaceans, cephalopods, and fishes, which they capture via different predatory behaviors, ambushing, stalking, and pursuit, and can thereby play an important role in marine food webs [4,5,6,7,8]. Most squid are characterized by high feeding rates, which are necessary in maintaining the high metabolic and growth rates associated with their short lifespans of approximately 1 or 2 years [9]. Given their ecological characteristics, squid have attracted considerable attention as potential beneficiaries in the future changing oceans and/or indicators of the impacts of climate change on marine systems [10,11,12]. Consequently, it is important to understand the ecological roles played by squid populations in marine systems, particularly their feeding ecology, dietary composition, ontogenetic dietary changes, and feeding behaviors.
The common squid Todarodes pacificus (Ommastrephidae) is among the predominant species comprising epipelagic communities in the South and East seas of Korea and the East China Sea [13,14]. In Korean waters, the total catch of T. pacificus as a warm-water species underwent a rapid increase after the late 1980s, which is assumed to be associated with the general response of marine ecosystems to shifts in the climatic regime [15]. Furthermore, this squid is a commercially important species, accounting for more than 10% of the total catch obtained by the Korean fishery industry [16]. It is a generalist predator that typically feeds on zooplankton and small pelagic fish [17]. Similar to other Ommastrephid squid, T. pacificus undergoes ontogenetic dietary changes from crustaceans (e.g., copepods, amphipods, and euphausiids) in juveniles (<50 mm mantle length, ML) to crustaceans and fish in medium-sized individuals (50–99 mm ML), fish in adult-sized individuals (100–150 mm ML), and fish and squid in the largest individuals (>150 mm ML), as assessed via stomach content analyses [14,18]. T. pacificus has a wide prey spectrum, including cannibalism, which varies among regions and is dependent on the availability of the prey [14]. Nevertheless, despite the acknowledged ecological importance of T. pacificus, studies of its feeding ecology are notably limited. Given its increasing commercial value as a fishery resource, information on the trophic ecology of the common squid is essential for successful fishery management and conservation in rapidly changing oceanic environments.
A stomach content analysis has conventionally been used to assess the feeding ecology and quantify the dietary composition of marine organisms, including cephalopods [8,19,20]. However, given several limitations associated with digested, unidentifiable, or absent dietary items in the stomachs of consumers and differences in the digestibility of dietary components, this approach may present problems with respect to identification, quantification, and interpretation [6,21,22]. To overcome such drawbacks, an analysis of the stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen has been used as a complementary approach for analyzing the stomach contents to identify assimilated dietary items among available food sources and determine the structure of food webs in marine ecosystems [23,24,25]. Carbon stable isotope ratios (δ13C) generally increase from the diet to the consumer at an enrichment of approximately 1.0‰ and have been used to infer dietary sources [26,27]. In contrast, nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ15N) can significantly increase by 2–4‰ from prey to predator, thereby generally providing information on the trophic position (TP) of the consumer species [28,29]. Recently, the combined application of stable isotope and stomach content analyses has been successfully adopted to provide insights into the feeding habits and ontogenetic dietary shifts of various fish species and cephalopods [30,31,32,33,34].
In this study, based on a combined analysis of stable isotopes and stomach contents, we sought to assess the trophic ecology of T. pacificus in the South Sea of Korea, which, as the predominant species, may play a significant ecological role in the marine food web of coastal waters. Specifically, to assess the dietary composition, TP, and ontogenetic dietary shifts, we analyzed δ13C and δ15N concentrations in the muscle tissues of common squid and the stomach contents of specimens in different body size classes during different seasons in the South Sea of Korea. As a primary approach for common squid collected in Korean coastal waters and a useful tool for investigating the dietary characteristics of cephalopods, a combination of stable isotope and stomach content analyses can be expected to reflect the trophic role of common squid in the marine food web and its feeding ecology during ontogeny.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Collection

For the study, we collected samples at four sites in the subtidal zone off the southern part of the Korean Peninsula (104: 34°25′ N, 127°75′ E; 106: 34°25′ N, 128°75′ E; 111: 33°75′ N, 128°75′ E; and 224: 33°75′ N, 127°25′ E) in February, May, and August 2021 (Figure 1). The water depth at the sampling sites ranged from 83 m to 123 m, with a low tidal amplitude less than 30 cm. Samples of all fish and zooplankton species were collected from the Tamgu 20 (885 t) and Tamgu 22 (1458 t) research vessels of the Fisheries Resources Research Center of the National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS). Fish samples were collected by trawl surveys (12 cm mesh in the main body, 8 cm mesh in the intermediate part, and 6 cm mesh in the cod end with a 2 cm cod end net liner), and zooplankton samples were collected using a Bongo net (2.0 m2 mouth opening, 500 μm mesh). For the fish samples, biological parameters, including total length (to the nearest 0.1 cm) and biomass (to the nearest 0.1 g) of each individual were gauged onboard. All collected fish and zooplankton samples were initially stored in a freezer (−20 °C) and then transported to the laboratory for processing.

2.2. Sample Processing

In the laboratory, all sampled fish and common squid were dissected, and muscle tissues were collected from the anterior dorsal parts for the stable isotope analysis. Whole-body samples were prepared for the stable isotope analysis of dominant zooplankton, including copepods and euphausiids. All prepared samples were freeze-dried, ground to a homogenous powder using a ball mill, and stored in a vacuum desiccator until used for further analysis. Common squid stomach samples were collected and individually preserved in 10% formalin for further analyses, as described below.

2.3. Stomach Content Analysis

During the sampling period, a total of 701 T. pacificus individuals were collected; among which, the stomachs of 233 were sampled for content analysis. Each stomach sample was examined using a LEICA L2 stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and prey items were counted and categorized to the lowest possible taxonomic level. The wet weight of each item was measured to the nearest 0.0001 g using an analytical balance (ME204TE/00; Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). Given the uncertainty and biases associated with the estimates of cephalopod dietary compositions obtained using the index of relative importance (IRI), we applied a ranking index (RI) in this study [6,8]. Food items in the stomachs of common squid were assessed based on the percentage frequency of occurrence (%F), which is the number of stomachs in which a particular food item occurs (as a percentage of the total number of examined stomachs), and percentage wet weight (%W) of each food item to the total wet weight of the identifiable food items. RI values were estimated for all food items of each prey type [RI = %W × %F] and expressed as a percentage (%RI) as follows: % R I = R I i / i = 1 n R I i × 100 [35], where n is the total number of food items categorized as class levels. Size-related ontogenetic dietary changes in common squid were examined using the three size classes <10, 10–20, and ≥20 cm ML.

2.4. Stable Isotope Analyses

Small quantities (0.5–1.0 mg) of the powered samples were weighed into tin combustion capsules. All encapsulated samples were combusted at a high temperature (1020 °C) using a CNSOH elemental analyzer (EA Isolink, Bremen, Germany), and the resulting gas was analyzed for carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios using a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (CF-IRMS: DELTA V PLUS; Bremen, Germany). The carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios are expressed in delta (δ) notation as a difference from the respective conventional standards (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite for carbon and atmospheric N2 for nitrogen) as follows: δ X   ( ) = [ ( R s a m p l e R s t a n d a r d ) 1 ] × 10 3 , where X is 13C or 15N, and R is 13C/12C or 15N/14N. To calibrate the analyzed isotope values, we obtained the international standard values of sucrose (ANU C12H22O11; NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and ammonium sulfate ([NH4]2SO4; NIST) after measuring each group of 10 samples. The analytical reproducibility based on 20 urea replicates was within 0.11‰ and 0.15‰ for δ13C and δ15N, respectively.
Lipids are generally highly abundant in fish, which can lead to a bias in δ13C value estimates. If the mass ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) for fish species exceeds 3.5, it is considered to be attributable to a reduction in the δ13C value owing to 12C enrichment, and in this case, we applied lipid correction (non-lipid extracted) according to Post et al. [36]. The lipid correction formula used for non-lipid extracted samples was as follows: δ 13 C n o r m a l i z e d = δ 13 C u n t r e a t e d 3.32 + 0.99 × C : N   ( r a t i o s ) , where δ 13 C u n t r e a t e d and δ 13 C n o r m a l i z e d are the measured and lipid-corrected δ13C values of the non-lipid extracted sample, respectively.
The TP values of consumer species were calculated according to the following formula:   T P i = ( δ 15 N i δ 15 N b a s e l i n e ) / 15 N + 2 , where δ15Ni represents the δ15N value of each target consumer, δ15Nbaseline is the mean δ15N of baseline organisms (copepod group) selected in this study, 15 N is the nitrogen enrichment factor of 3.4‰ in δ15N, and 2 represents the baseline TP [28,29].

2.5. Data Analyses

All data were initially assessed for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and homogeneity of variance (Levene’s test) prior to further statistical analyses using the R software (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria, 2016). A permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using PRIMER version 6 + PRIMER add-on (PRIMER-e, Auckland, New Zealand) was used to compare seasonal differences in the δ13C and δ15N values of common squid and other consumer species (zooplankton and fish). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, San Francisco, CA, USA) with Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) multiple-comparison post hoc test in R software was performed to compare the stable isotope and TP values of consumer species and the MLs of common squid. A linear regression analysis was performed using the R software to assess the size-based trophic relationship between ML and stable isotope values (δ13C and δ15N) in common squid. Moreover, dietary compositions were assessed based on a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) using the R program, which visually depicts the relationship between samples and species in a reduced space [8,37].

3. Results

3.1. Dietary Composition: Relative Importance

Among the stomachs of the 701 common squid examined, 468 stomachs were found to be empty, whereas the contents of the remaining stomachs comprised prey from eight groups, as examined based on class (Figure 2). Regardless of season, Pisces (37.9% in August to 94.0% in February) and Cephalopoda (6.0% in February to 61.0% in August) contributed the largest proportions of the stomach contents of common squid. An analysis of size-related stomach contents based on ML (<10, 10–20, and >20 cm) also revealed Pisces and Cephalopoda to be the major constituents. However, among squid in the ML <10 cm group, the stomach contents of specimens collected in August comprised primarily Crustacea (95.5%), whereas Pisces and Cephalopoda were found to be minor components (2.3% and 2.2%, respectively).
The arrangement of T. pacificus and its dietary items based on DCA ordination yielded eigenvalues of λ1 = 0.928, λ2 = 0.221, and λ3 = 0.138 for the first composition gradients (Figure 3). The smallest individuals of common squid collected in August were associated with Crustacea, whereas the other groups were plotted in the vicinity of Pisces in February, that of Stromatopoda and Salpida in May, and that of Brachyura in August.

3.2. Stable Isotope Ratios

3.2.1. Common Squid

The δ13C and δ15N values of common squid were found to differ significantly among the three assessed seasons (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F2, 95 = 8.01, p = 0.002), with δ13C values being higher in August (−18.9‰ ± 0.6‰) than in February (−19.3‰ ± 0.8‰) and May (−19.5‰ ± 0.7‰) (Tukey’s HSD test: each p < 0.01), whereas δ15N values were higher in February (11.3‰ ± 0.6‰) than in May (10.4‰ ± 0.7‰) and August (10.8‰ ± 1.0‰) (Tukey’s HSD test: each p < 0.01). The TP values of common squid were higher in February than in May and August (Tukey’s HSD test: each p < 0.01), ranging from 2.9 ± 0.3 (August) to 3.4 ± 0.2 (February).
In contrast, we detected no significant differences in the ML of common squid collected in the three seasons (one-way ANOVA: p = 0.232), ranging from 16.8 ± 4.0 cm (6.9–23.7 cm in May) to 18.6 ± 4.6 cm (8.6–23.5 cm in February). Furthermore, in February and May, no significant correlations were found between the MLs and isotopic values (δ13C: r = 0.096, p = 0.689, and r = 0.260, p = 0.060, respectively; δ15N: r = 0.399, p = 0.081, and r = 0.086, p = 0.540, respectively) (Figure 4). However, in August, ML was significantly correlated with both isotopic values (δ13C: r = 0.556, p = 0.006; δ15N: r = 0.839, p < 0.001).

3.2.2. Zooplankton and Other Fish Consumers

Significant differences were detected among the sampling periods with respect to the δ13C and δ15N values of the two zooplankton groups copepods and euphausiids (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F2, 29 = 13.22, p = 0.001 and pseudo-F2, 19 = 5.43, p = 0.003, respectively) (Table 1). For copepods, we obtained δ13C and δ15N values of −22.2‰ ± 0.9‰ (May) to −20.1‰ ± 1.0‰ (February) and 6.5‰ ± 0.4‰ (February) to 8.2‰ ± 0.3‰ (August), respectively. Comparatively, the δ13C and δ15N values of euphausiids ranged from −21.3‰ ± 1.1‰ (August) to −20.2‰ ± 1.0‰ (February) and from 6.9‰ ± 0.9‰ (February) to 7.8‰ ± 0.7‰ (August), respectively.
With the exception of those of common squid, the δ13C and δ15N values of all fish consumers differed significantly among the sampling periods (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F2, 87 = 8.87, p = 0.001). The mean δ13C values of fish were relatively high in February (−19.4‰ ± 0.5‰ to −16.4‰ ± 0.1‰) and August (−19.1‰ ± 0.8‰ to −17.9‰) compared with those in May (−20.1‰ ± 0.8‰ to −17.1‰ ± 0.8‰) (Figure 5 and Table 2). In contrast, fish had lower δ15N values in August (8.9–11.9‰) than in February (9.3–14.9‰ ± 0.5‰) and May (8.5–13.1‰ ± 0.6‰). Moreover, the mean TP values of fish were significantly higher in February (3.72 ± 0.50) than in May (3.10 ± 0.33) and August (2.84 ± 0.27; Tukey’s HSD test: each p < 0.01).

4. Discussion

The feeding ecology of marine species is generally influenced by environmental conditions, food availability, trophic interactions, and species competition [2,27,38]. In the present study, we adopted the combined application of stomach content and stable isotope analyses to examine the feeding ecology of the common squid T. pacificus along the southern coast of Korea, from seasonal and size-related ontogenetic feeding perspectives. Collectively, the findings of the study revealed temporal and size-related patterns among common squid, indicating that these cephalopods are opportunistic carnivores based on seasonal differences in their dietary composition and ontogenetic dietary shifts during the sampling periods. Such information on seasonal dietary changes and ontogenetic variation in the common squid provides further insight into how changes in environmental conditions and prey availability may affect the trophic ecology of this commercially important species.
The results of the present study revealed seasonal shifts in the diets of common squid in terms of prey composition, of which the main groups, based on stomach content analyses, were Pisces (37.9–94.0%) and Cephalopoda (6.0–61.0%) throughout the three sampling periods, with a gradual increase in the proportion of dietary items from Pisces to Cephalopoda from winter to summer). Similarly, the DCA results indicated a seasonal variability in the dietary composition of common squid and dietary changes relative to ML. Although the potential effects of body size were considered, we observed that dietary trends were similar across the sampling periods. Such seasonal shifts in the dietary items consumed by common squid may be associated with changes in regional food availability, as indicated by the wide regional and seasonal variation in the feeding spectrum [14]. In general, most omnivorous and carnivorous consumers in marine ecosystems tend to be characterized by dietary plasticity, that is, feeding on a variety of prey, depending on food availability and environmental conditions [25,39,40,41]. Many squid species, including T. pacificus, actively feed on zooplankton, cephalopods, and small fish, and may also engage in cannibalism [6,7,8]. However, despite the dietary opportunism of T. pacificus, the stomach contents observed in the present study showed relatively little seasonal variation and low prey diversity compared with the results obtained in previous studies [14,18], which we suspect could be due to the geographical differences in the abundance and availability of potential prey for T. pacificus.
A stomach content analysis revealed very similar patterns in dietary prey composition among common squid of the three different size classes in February and May, which indicates high intraspecific feeding competition with no size-related dietary shifts. Although marine fishes typically undergo ontogenetic changes that entail the partitioning of dietary resources, our results indicate an absence of ontogenetic size-related dietary shifts in prey composition during winter and spring. Compared with those of the other two size classes, the common squid of size class ML <10 cm showed a rather obvious distinction in dietary composition in August with respect to the high proportion of Crustacea (95.5%) in the diet. In this regard, numerous studies have reported that marine fishes and cephalopods undergo ontogenetic dietary shifts that are characterized by changes in size-specific prey–predator relationships [22,33,38]. Consistent with the findings of the present study, Uchikawa and Kidoroko [18] detected a clear size-related dietary change in T. pacificus, in which small individuals fed mainly on crustaceans, whereas larger individuals shifted to a more fish-based diet. Such ontogenetic shifts in the diets of marine consumers are assumed to be associated with their higher predatory ability and improved swimming capacity with increasing growth [42,43]. Growth and morphological changes in T. pacificus may result in higher swimming performance, and thus a higher proportion of fish in their diets [18,44]. However, the feeding characteristics of T. pacificus observed during only one specific season (i.e., summer) may be an effect of seasonal changes in prey availability, as opportunistic consumers generally tend to achieve energy optimization by reducing intra- and/or interspecific food competition [45,46]. Thus, size-related changes in common squid diets that occur only during summer may be closely associated with prey availability and environmental conditions in the foraging area, rather than with an enhancement in predation capacity.
The stable isotope data obtained in this study revealed isotopic variation over the sampling periods, thereby indicating a seasonal shift in dietary sources, and thus a change in TP values, as observed based on the stomach content analysis. As discussed above, most squid can rapidly adjust their feeding strategies in response to changes in seasonal and annual prey availability [22,47]. This may be supported by seasonal isotopic variability, which reflects the temporal changes in the feeding ecology of T. pacificus. In the present study, we established that the relatively higher δ15N values of T. pacificus in February compared to those obtained in other seasons may be associated with the high proportion of fish in their diets, with respect to the generally high TP of fish species. In August, despite a reduction in the contribution of dietary fish to the composition of common squid tissue, the relatively high δ13C values compared to those in other months may be associated with seasonal variability in the trophic baseline (i.e., phytoplankton-derived organic matter) in sampling regions with different prey composition [48]. In marine ecosystems, the δ13C values of phytoplankton-derived organic matter generally reflect spatial and temporal variations in marine particles, including phytoplankton, under different ambient conditions, and thereby contribute to the δ13C values of higher TP consumers along food chains [27]. The δ13C values of common squid (−19.5‰ to 18.9‰) obtained in the present study may reflect a tendency of trophic connections of the general pelagic system with two zooplankton groups, indicating a linkage between T. pacificus and phytoplankton-derived organic matter [25]. Accordingly, seasonal changes in the isotopic composition of the common squid are considered to be indicative of the variability of dietary items and isotopic baseline sources corresponding to changes in seasonal environmental conditions.
The δ13C–δ15N dual-isotope plots shown in Figure 5 indicate discrimination between pelagic and benthic feeders along the δ13C axis. Compared with the benthic-feeding demersal fish, pelagic feeders, such as the common squid, are generally characterized by relatively low δ13C and δ15N values [25,33]. Consistently, our findings in the present study revealed the relatively low δ13C and δ15N values of common squid, indicating that the isotopic niche of this species is closer to that of the zooplankton group’s copepods and euphausiids regardless of the season. Moreover, the distribution and migration of T. pacificus are significantly influenced by physical conditions (e.g., water temperature), which can play an important role in altering the seasonal patterns in marine fish food webs [14,25].
The TP estimates obtained for common squid and other consumers based on the δ15N values of zooplankton have revealed temporal variation resulting from a seasonal difference in the δ15N values of food web baselines [25]. The relatively high δ15N values of zooplankton recorded in August compared with those obtained in February may have contributed to the low TP estimates obtained for consumers during summer. The high δ15N values of phytoplankton-derived organic matter as an isotopic baseline during summer can probably be attributed to the proliferation of phytoplankton influenced by excessive nutrient input associated with heavy monsoonal rainfall, which is consistent with previous observations in the southern coastal waters of Korea [48]. Similar to the temporal variability of common squid δ13C, seasonal differences in the TP values of these squid may result from the variability of zooplankton δ15N influenced by phytoplankton dynamics associated with regional oceanographic conditions.
In the present study, significant positive correlations between ML and both the δ13C and δ15N values of common squid were detected only in summer, thereby indicating clear size-dependent shifts in ontogenetic dietary composition. which is consistent with our observations of seasonal dietary changes based on the stomach content analysis (Figure 2). The high contribution of Crustacea (more than 95%) to the diet of the smallest common squids (ML < 10 cm) in August may have led to lower δ13C and δ15N values compared with those of larger individuals, and thereby to positive isotopic gradients with increasing body size. Such relationships between size and isotopic values of cephalopods and fish species have been reported in several studies and may be indicative of a general size-related pattern in ontogenetic dietary shifts [32,33,49]. Similarly, an increase in the δ15N values of common squid with increasing ML is assumed to reflect an increase in the consumption of larger and trophically higher prey items (e.g., fish and cephalopods) during summer. In contrast, the lack of size-related isotopic relationships in common squid during winter and spring indicates a high dietary overlap among the specimens in the three assessed size classes associated with the consumption of similar diets. This lack of size-related patterns in resource use by common squid may result in heightened intraspecific competition, as indicated by the composition of stomach contents. Overall, the observed seasonal patterns in size-related isotopic distributions of common squid may be explained in terms of the temporal variability of the major dietary components for specific size classes associated with the seasonally changing availability of food in the region.
In conclusion, our combined application of stomach content and stable isotope analyses in this study revealed seasonal differences in the dietary composition and ontogenetic dietary patterns of the common squid in the South Sea of Korea. Our observations indicate that the feeding strategy adopted by these squid changes with the seasonal availability of prey in this region. In particular, although we detected no apparent size-related dietary changes during winter or spring, there was a clear ontogenetic dietary shift from crustaceans to cephalopods and fishes during summer, thereby indicating temporal variability in feeding strategies in response to the availability of prey. Collectively, the findings of this study advance our understanding of the feeding ecology of T. pacificus, thereby providing valuable information that will contribute to refining the ecological-based fishery management of this commercially important species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K. and H.J.P.; Data curation, T.H.P.; Formal analysis, D.S.; Investigation, D.S.; Methodology, J.H.J.; Supervision, H.J.P.; Writing—original draft, D.S., T.H.P. and H.J.P.; Writing—review & editing, C.-I.L., C.G.C., S.K. and H.J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Fisheries Science, Korea (R2022030), and the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (20220214).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clarke, M.R. Cephalopods as prey. III. Cetaceans. Phil. Tran. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1996, 351, 1053–1065. [Google Scholar]
  2. Navarro, J.; Coll, M.; Somes, C.J.; Olson, R.J. Trophic niche of squids: Insights from isotopic data in marine systems worldwide. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2013, 95, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lordan, C.; Burnell, G.M.; Cross, T.F. The diet and ecological importance of Illex coindetii and Todaropsis eblanae (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in Irish waters. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 1998, 20, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Takai, N.; Onaka, S.; Ikeda, Y.; Yatsu, A.; Kidokoro, H.; Sakamoto, W. Geographical variations in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios in squid. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2000, 80, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cherel, Y.; Hobson, K.A. Stable isotopes, beaks and predators: A new tool to study the trophic ecology of cephalopods, including giant and colossal squids. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272, 1601–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ibáñez, C.M.; Arancibia, H.; Cubillos, L.A. Biases in determining the diet of jumbo squid Dosidicus gigas (D’ Orbigny 1835) (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) off southern-central Chile (34°S–40°S). Helgol. Mar. Res. 2008, 62, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leite, T.S.; Haimovici, M.; Mather, J. Octopus insularis (Octopodidae), evidences of a specialized predator and a time minimizing forager. Mar. Biol. 2009, 156, 2355–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ibáñez, C.M.; Riera, R.; Leite, T.; Díaz-Santana-Iturrios, M.; Rui, R.; Pardo-Gandarillas, M.C. Stomach content analysis in cephalopods: Past research, current challenges, and future directions. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2021, 31, 505–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boyle, P.; Rodhouse, P.G.K. Ecology and Fisheries; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dawe, E.G.; Colbourne, E.B.; Drinkwater, K.F. Environmental effects on recruitment of short-finned squid (Illex illecebrosus). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2000, 57, 1002–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coll, M.; Navarro, J.; Olson, R.J.; Christensen, V. Assessing the trophic position and ecological role of squids in marine ecosystems by means of food-web models. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2013, 95, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stewart, J.S.; Hazen, E.L.; Bograd, S.J.; Byrnes, J.E.; Foley, D.G.; Gilly, W.F.; Field, J.C. Combined climate-and prey-mediated range expansion of Humboldt squid (Dosidicus gigas), a large marine predator in the California Current System. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 1832–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hwang, K.S.; Kang, S.K.; Oh, T.Y.; Choi, K.H.; Lee, D.W. Change in the Fishing Grounds and the Relationship between the Abundance of the Common Squid Todarodes pacificus and the Distribution of Zooplankton in the East Sea. Korean J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2012, 45, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sakurai, Y.; Kidokoro, H.; Yamashita, N.; Yamamoto, J.; Uchikawa, K.; Takahara, H. Todarodes pacificus, Japanese common squid. In Advances in Squid Biology, Ecology and Fisheries. Part II Oegopsid Squids; Rosa, R., Pierce, G., O’Dor, R., Eds.; Nova Biomedical: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 249–272. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jung, H.K.; Rahman, S.M.; Kang, C.K.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.J.; Lee, C.I.; Kim, H.-W. The influence of climate regime shifts on the marine environment and ecosystems in the East Asian Marginal Seas and their mechanisms. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2017, 143, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. KOSIS. Korean Statistical Information Service. Available online: http://kosis.kr (accessed on 1 September 2019).
  17. Lee, D.; Son, S.H.; Lee, C.I.; Kang, C.K.; Lee, S.H. Spatio-temporal variability of the habitat suitability index for the Todarodes pacificus (Japanese common squid) around South Korea. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Uchikawa, K.; Kidokoro, H. Feeding habits of juvenile Japanese common squid Todarodes pacificus: Relationship between dietary shift and allometric growth. Fish. Res. 2014, 152, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nixon, M. Cephalopod diets. In Cephalopod Life Cycles, Volume II. Comparative Reviews; Boyle, P.R., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1987; pp. 201–219. [Google Scholar]
  20. Buckland, A.; Baker, R.; Loneragan, N.; Sheaves, M. Standardising fish stomach content analysis: The importance of prey condition. Fish. Res. 2017, 196, 126–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deb, D. Trophic uncertainty vs. parsimony in food web research. Oikos 1997, 78, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Stable isotope analysis revealed ontogenetic changes in trophic ecology and migration patterns of Sepia esculenta in the northern coastal waters of China. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 818088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Davenport, S.; Bax, N.J. A trophic study of a marine ecosystem off southeastern Australia using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59, 514–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Layman, C.; Araujo, M.S.; Boucek, R.; Hammerschlag-Peyer, C.M.; Harrision, E.; Jud, Z.R.; Matich, P.; Rosenblatt, A.E.; Vaudo, J.J.; Yeager, L.A.; et al. Applying stable isotopes to examine food-web structure: An overview of analytical tools. Biol. Rev. 2012, 87, 545–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, T.H.; Lee, C.I.; Kang, C.K.; Kwak, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Park, H.J. Seasonal variation in food web structure and fish community composition in the East/Japan sea. Estuar. Coast. 2020, 43, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. DeNiro, M.J.; Epstein, S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1978, 42, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fry, B.; Sherr, E.B. δ13C measurements as indicators of carbon flow in marine and freshwater ecosystems. Cont. Mar. Sci. 1984, 27, 13–47. [Google Scholar]
  28. Minagawa, M.; Wada, E. Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: Further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1984, 48, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Post, D.M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 2002, 83, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruiz-Cooley, R.I.; Markaida, U.; Gendron, D.; Aguíñiga, S. Stable isotopes in jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) beaks to estimate its trophic position: Comparison between stomach contents and stable isotopes. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2006, 86, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Santos, A.R.; Trueman, C.; Connolly, P.; Rogan, E. Trophic ecology of black scabbardfish, Aphanopus carbo in the NE Atlantic—assessment through stomach content and stable isotope analyses. Deep Sea Res. I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2013, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Merten, V.; Christiansen, B.; Javidpour, J.; Piatkowski, U.; Puebla, O.; Gasca, R.; Hoving, H.J.T. Diet and stable isotope analyses reveal the feeding ecology of the orangeback squid Sthenoteuthis pteropus (Steenstrup 1855) (Mollusca, Ommastrephidae) in the eastern tropical Atlantic. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Park, H.J.; Park, T.H.; Lee, C.I.; Kang, C.K. Ontogenetic shifts in diet and trophic position of walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, in the western East Sea (Japan Sea) revealed by stable isotope and stomach content analyses. Fish. Res. 2018, 204, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jackson, G.D.; Bustamante, P.; Cherel, Y.; Fulton, E.A.; Grist, E.P.M.; Jackson, C.H.; Nichols, P.D.; Pethybridge, H.; Phillips, K.; Xavier, J.C.; et al. Applying new tools to cephalopod trophic dynamics and ecology: Perspectives from the Southern Ocean Cephalopod Workshop, February 2–3, 2006. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2007, 17, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hobson, E.S. Feeding relationships of teleostean fishes on coral reefs in Kona, Hawaii. Fish. Bull. 1974, 72, 915–1031. [Google Scholar]
  36. Post, D.M.; Layman, C.A.; Arrington, D.A.; Takimoto, G.; Quattrochi, J.; Montaña, C.G. Getting to the fat of the matter: Models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 2007, 152, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jongman, R.H.G.; Ter Braaka, C.J.F.; Van Tongeren, O.F.R. Data Analysis in Communities and Landscape Ecology; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  38. Juanes, F.; Buckel, J.A.; Scharf, F.S. Chapter 12 Feeding ecology of piscivorous fishes. In Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries: Fish Biology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002; Volume 267. [Google Scholar]
  39. Adams, C.F.; Pinchuk, A.I.; Coyle, K.O. Seasonal changes in the diet composition and prey selection of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) in the northern Gulf of Alaska. Fish. Res. 2007, 84, 378–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Henriques, S.; Guilhaumon, F.; Villéger, S.; Amoroso, S.; França, S.; Pasquaud, S.; Vasconcelos, R.P.; Cabral, H.N. Biogeographical region and environmental conditions drive functional traits of estuarine fish assemblages worldwide. Fish Fish. 2017, 18, 752–771. [Google Scholar]
  41. Szczepanek, M.; Silberberger, M.J.; Koziorowska-Makuch, K.; Nobili, E.; Kędra, M. The response of coastal macrobenthic food-web structure to seasonal and regional variability in organic matter properties. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 132, 108326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lundvall, D.; Svanbäck, R.; Persson, L.; Byström, P. Size-dependent predation in piscivores: Interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1999, 56, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Boyle, M.D.; Ebert, D.A.; Cailliet, G.M. Stable-isotope analysis of a deep-sea benthic-fish assemblage: Evidence of an enriched benthic food web. J. Fish Biol. 2012, 80, 1485–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Christensen, B. Predator foraging capabilities and prey antipredator behaviours: Pre-versus postcapture constraints on size-dependent predator-prey interactions. Oikos 1996, 76, 368–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Griffiths, D. Prey availability and the food of predators. Ecology 1975, 56, 1209–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Park, H.J.; Kang, H.Y.; Park, T.H.; Kang, C.K. Comparative trophic structures of macrobenthic food web in two macrotidal wetlands with and without a dike on the temperate coast of Korea as revealed by stable isotopes. Mar. Environ. Res. 2017, 131, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hunsicker, M.E.; Essington, T.E.; Aydin, K.Y.; Ishida, B. Predatory role of the commander squid Berryteuthis magister in the eastern Bering Sea: Insights from stable isotopes and food habits. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2010, 415, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kang, C.K.; Choy, E.J.; Hur, Y.B.; Myeong, J.I. Isotopic evidence of particle size-dependent food partitioning in cocultured sea squirt Halocynthia roretzi and Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Aquat. Biol. 2009, 6, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Graham, B.S.; Grubbs, D.; Holland, K.; Popp, B.N. A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of juvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawaii. Mar. Biol. 2007, 150, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A map showing the location of the sampling areas in the South Sea of Korea. Filled circles indicate the four sampling sites (#104, #106, #111, and #224) at which zooplankton, common squid Todarodes pacificus, and other fish consumers were collected.
Figure 1. A map showing the location of the sampling areas in the South Sea of Korea. Filled circles indicate the four sampling sites (#104, #106, #111, and #224) at which zooplankton, common squid Todarodes pacificus, and other fish consumers were collected.
Water 14 03159 g001
Figure 2. Size-related (mantle length, ML; three size classes, <10 cm, 10–20 cm, and >20 cm) and total (D) compositions of the stomach contents of common squid Todarodes pacificus based on the ranking index (%RI) expressed as a percentage of the sum of the RI values in the South Sea of Korea during February (winter, (A)), May (spring, (B)), and August (summer, (C)) 2021.
Figure 2. Size-related (mantle length, ML; three size classes, <10 cm, 10–20 cm, and >20 cm) and total (D) compositions of the stomach contents of common squid Todarodes pacificus based on the ranking index (%RI) expressed as a percentage of the sum of the RI values in the South Sea of Korea during February (winter, (A)), May (spring, (B)), and August (summer, (C)) 2021.
Water 14 03159 g002
Figure 3. Bi-plot of detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) derived from consumer species and their dietary compositions in a reduced space. Red triangles represent prey items. Circles, squares, and hexagons represent common squid Todarodes pacificus in the South Sea of Korea during February (blue), May (green), and August (yellow) 2021.
Figure 3. Bi-plot of detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) derived from consumer species and their dietary compositions in a reduced space. Red triangles represent prey items. Circles, squares, and hexagons represent common squid Todarodes pacificus in the South Sea of Korea during February (blue), May (green), and August (yellow) 2021.
Water 14 03159 g003
Figure 4. Regression relationships between δ13C—mantle length (cm, left) and δ15N—mantle length (cm, right) of common squid Todarodes pacificus collected in the South Sea of Korea during February (winter, (A)), May (spring, (B)), and August (summer, (C)) 2021. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Regression relationships between δ13C—mantle length (cm, left) and δ15N—mantle length (cm, right) of common squid Todarodes pacificus collected in the South Sea of Korea during February (winter, (A)), May (spring, (B)), and August (summer, (C)) 2021. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Water 14 03159 g004
Figure 5. Dual isotope plots of δ13C and δ15N values of zooplankton (black squares, euphausiids; gray squares, copepods), common squid Trichiurus japonicus (red circles), and other fishes (blue circles) in the South Sea of Korea during February (winter, (A)), May (spring, (B)), and August (summer, (C)) 2021. Values are presented as mean δ13C and δ15N (‰ ± 1 SD). Species codes are shown in Table 2.
Figure 5. Dual isotope plots of δ13C and δ15N values of zooplankton (black squares, euphausiids; gray squares, copepods), common squid Trichiurus japonicus (red circles), and other fishes (blue circles) in the South Sea of Korea during February (winter, (A)), May (spring, (B)), and August (summer, (C)) 2021. Values are presented as mean δ13C and δ15N (‰ ± 1 SD). Species codes are shown in Table 2.
Water 14 03159 g005
Table 1. Mean δ13C and δ15N values of the zooplankton groups calanoid copepods and euphausiids, collected during February, May, and August 2021 in the South Sea of Korea (#104, #106, #111, and #224). PERMANOVA test of δ13C and δ15N values for each zooplankton among seasons. Bold-faced font indicates significance at p < 0.05. Data represent means ± 1 SD.
Table 1. Mean δ13C and δ15N values of the zooplankton groups calanoid copepods and euphausiids, collected during February, May, and August 2021 in the South Sea of Korea (#104, #106, #111, and #224). PERMANOVA test of δ13C and δ15N values for each zooplankton among seasons. Bold-faced font indicates significance at p < 0.05. Data represent means ± 1 SD.
FebruaryMayAugustPERMANOVA
Zooplankton group δ13C δ15N δ13C δ15N δ13C δ15N pseudo-Fp
nMeanSDMeanSDnMeanSDMeanSDnMeanSDMeanSD
Copepods10−20.11.06.50.412−22.20.97.30.47−20.20.58.20.313.220.001
Euphausiids5−20.21.06.90.910−21.10.86.90.44−21.31.17.80.75.430.003
Table 2. Mean δ13C and δ15N values and trophic position (TP) of common squid Todarodes pacificus and other fish consumers collected during February, May, and August 2021 in the South Sea of Korea (#104, #106, #111, and #224). Data represent means ± 1 SD.
Table 2. Mean δ13C and δ15N values and trophic position (TP) of common squid Todarodes pacificus and other fish consumers collected during February, May, and August 2021 in the South Sea of Korea (#104, #106, #111, and #224). Data represent means ± 1 SD.
MonthSpecies NameCodenδ13Cδ15NTP
MeanS.D.MeanS.D.
FebruaryTodarodes pacificusTp20−19.30.811.30.63.41
Acropoma japonicumAj3−19.00.511.50.23.48
Champsodon snyderiCs1−19.3 9.3 2.82
Conger myriasterCm2−19.40.513.30.44.00
Hoplobrotula armataHa3−17.80.312.40.43.73
Lateolabrax japonicusLj3−16.40.114.90.54.47
Niphon spinosusNs1−18.1 12.7 3.82
Octopus vulgarisOv1−17.0 12.2 3.69
MayTodarodes pacificusTp53−19.50.710.40.73.03
Apogon lineatusAl3−18.70.29.90.12.87
Argentina kagoshimaeAk2−17.80.010.30.13.00
Argyrosomus argentatusAa2−17.40.213.00.63.81
Benthosema pterotumBp3−19.90.410.00.42.91
Cleisthenes pinetorumCp3−17.90.411.31.23.30
Coelorinchus multispinulosusCo1−18.2 8.5 2.47
Conger myriasterCm3−18.40.810.90.63.19
Doederleinia berycoidesDb3−19.01.111.00.53.21
Helicolenus hilgendorfiHh1−18.0 11.7 3.40
Hyperoglyphe japonicaHj1−19.4 9.2 2.68
Liparis tanakaeLt1−18.0 10.1 2.96
Lophius litulonLl3−17.40.211.80.73.45
Malakichthys wakiyaeMw3−18.50.59.80.52.84
Neobythites sivicolaNs3−19.00.59.31.12.72
Psenopsis anomalaPa3−20.10.811.20.53.27
Synagrops philippinensisSp3−19.70.810.20.42.96
Tanakius kitaharaeTk3−17.30.210.10.52.94
Trachurus japonicusTj3−18.10.211.00.23.22
Trichiurus japonicusTr3−19.90.711.50.43.34
Uroteuthis edulisUe3−19.00.49.60.22.79
Zenopsis nebulosaZn1−17.3 12.2 3.55
Zeus faberZf3−17.10.812.21.03.56
AugustTodarodes pacificusTp23−19.00.610.81.02.89
Loligo edulis budoLe3−18.60.310.50.62.80
Pagrus majorPm1−17.9 11.9 3.20
Psenopsis anomalaPa2−18.81.311.40.13.05
Scomber japonicusSj4−18.80.410.00.32.65
Thamnaconus modestusTm1−18.7 8.9 2.33
Trachurus japonicusTj3−18.90.210.60.42.81
Trichiurus japonicusTr3−18.30.511.20.72.99
Uroteuthis edulisUe3−19.10.810.90.12.91
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, D.; Park, T.H.; Lee, C.-I.; Jo, J.H.; Choi, C.G.; Kang, S.; Park, H.J. Feeding Ecology of Common Squid Todarodes pacificus in the South Sea of Korea Determined through Stable Isotope and Stomach Content Analyses. Water 2022, 14, 3159. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193159

AMA Style

Shin D, Park TH, Lee C-I, Jo JH, Choi CG, Kang S, Park HJ. Feeding Ecology of Common Squid Todarodes pacificus in the South Sea of Korea Determined through Stable Isotope and Stomach Content Analyses. Water. 2022; 14(19):3159. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Donghoon, Tae Hee Park, Chung-Il Lee, Jun Hyung Jo, Chang Geun Choi, Sukyung Kang, and Hyun Je Park. 2022. "Feeding Ecology of Common Squid Todarodes pacificus in the South Sea of Korea Determined through Stable Isotope and Stomach Content Analyses" Water 14, no. 19: 3159. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14193159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop