Next Article in Journal
Study on Index of Groundwater Ecological Function Crisis Classification and Early Warning in Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal
From Domestic Sewage to Potable Water Quality: New Approach in Organic Matter Removal Using Natural Treatment Systems for Wastewater
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decision-Making Framework for GI Layout Considering Site Suitability and Weighted Multi-Function Effectiveness: A Case Study in Beijing Sub-Center
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction

1
School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore
3
School of Environment, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
4
Centre for Water Systems, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
5
School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(12), 1910; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121910
Submission received: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 10 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction)

1. Introduction

Rapid population growth, urbanization and high-intensity human activities cause a multitude of extremely serious environmental problems all over the world [1]. In the construction of many urban areas, pervious vegetated ground surfaces have been progressively replaced with impervious pavements. Over the years, urbanization has induced floods and, consequently, the deterioration of the urban water environment. To alleviate these problems, the concept of a sponge city was first proposed and constructed in China [2,3].
Along with the onset of sponge city construction, many related studies were conducted, which yielded many positive results, such as the development of the China Sponge City database [4], environmental and economic cost–benefit comparison of sponge city construction [5,6], temporally and spatially adaptive optimal placement of green and grey runoff control infrastructures [7,8], etc. In order to reflect the state-of-the-art advances in urban runoff control and sponge city construction, we organized this Special Issue. We aimed to discuss and present research focused on the theories and technologies of sponge city construction; urban hydrology; methods of quantifying the benefits of a sponge cities; rainwater utilization; practices that mitigate urban flooding and soil erosion; the performance of GI; the impact of media; preferential flow paths; vegetation; climate; the design of hydrological, hydrodynamic and pollutant removal processes; and case studies on sustainable urban design and management using LID-GI principles and practices. We wish to express our gratitude to all the contributors who made this Special Issue so successful.

2. Summary of This Special Issue

In total, 13 papers were published in this Special Issue. The article types, authors, titles, keywords and study areas of these articles are summarized in Table 1. We have categorized these papers by article type in the table below.
Yin et al. presents a review on sponge city practices in China from their inception through to a systematic demonstration [9]. The main contents of the paper include: (1) Source control or a drainage system design for China’s sponge city construction. The key element of sponge city construction is to combine various specific technologies to alleviate urban water problems, such as flooding, water environment pollution, shortage of water resources and deterioration of water ecology. (2) The sponge city pilot projects in China are introduced, the achievements obtained and lessons learned are summarized; (3) the objectives, corresponding indicators, key contents and needs of sponge city construction at various scales are identified. Moreover, the paper also describes the obligations of sponge city construction for various stakeholders.
There are six papers that focus on the methods and tools of urban runoff control and sponge city construction. Liu et al. proposed a decision-making framework for GI layout considering site suitability and weighted multi-function effectiveness [10]. A case study in Beijing Sub-Center showed the feasibility of the proposed framework. Wang et al. developed an innovative modeling software that could play a role in the integrated simulation and overflow control application of urban drainage system [11]. The software was utilized in a real-time case–control study in one city of China, and it obtained significant optimized operation results, reducing combined sewer overflow (CSO) by making full use of the storage facilities and actuators. Peng et al. proposed a new simulation optimization method with new features of multithreading individual evaluation and fast data exchange by recoding SWMM with object-oriented programming [12]. These new features can rapidly accelerate optimization processes. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-III (NSGA-III) was selected as the optimization framework for a better performance in dealing with multi-objective optimization. The proposed method was used in the optimal design of a terminal CSO interception facility in Wuhan, China.
Martínez et al. considered the influence of green infrastructure on urban surface runoff generation and proposed a new modelling setup, which includes a rainfall–runoff infiltration process in overland flow and its interaction with a sewer network [13]. The effect of infiltration losses on the overland flow was evaluated through an infiltration algorithm added in a so-called Surf-2D model. Then, the surface flow from a surcharge sewer was also investigated by coupling the Surf-2D model with the SWMM 5.1. An evaluation of two approaches representing urban floods was carried out based on two 1D/2D model interactions. Two test cases were implemented to validate the model. David and Carvalho highlighted how the change in street cross-section profile affected flood characteristics, which pose different levels of risk to pedestrians [14]. They also found that the uncertainty of roughness could be more influential in runoff than in street profiles. This methodology can be applied to improve street and drainage design to better manage urban runoffs. Wei et al. proposed a new strategy to combine roads, green spaces, and drainage systems [15]. The crux of this strategy is to consider the organization of the runoff and the construction of the drainage system (including sponge city source control facilities), so that both the drainage and traffic functions are achieved. This new strategy was implemented in a pilot study of road reconstruction conducted in Zhangjiagang, Suzhou, China.
A further six papers concentrated on research of the structures and performances of typical source control facilities; among these source control facilities, bioretention facilities are the focus. By establishing a three-dimensional finite element model for numerical analysis and combining it with geotechnical tests, Tang et al. studied the effects of bioretention facility on water pressure distribution, seepage path, and slope stability under rainwater seepage conditions [16]. In addition, this study explored the relationship between the parameters of the bioretention facility and the stability of the slope in combination with the effect of runoff pollution control. Li et al. invented a modified bioretention facility that contains soil moisture conservation ropes [17]. Additionally, a modified bioretention facility and a contrasting traditional bioretention facility were constructed in Tianjin Eco-city, China. A redundancy analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between the variation in media physicochemical properties and microbial communities. It was found that an increase in media moisture could promote an increase in the relative abundance of several dominant microbial communities. Ho and Lin developed a new type of enhanced dephosphorization bioretention cell (EBC), which can not only efficiently remove nitrogen and COD, but also provides excellent phosphorus removal performance [18]. An EBC (length: 45 m; width: 15 m) and a traditional bioretention cell (TBC) of the same size were constructed in Anhui, China to treat rural nonpoint source pollution with high phosphorus concentration levels. After almost 2 years of on-site operation, the results indicate that TBCs and EBCs show similar performances in the removal of ammonium nitrogen and COD, but that the EBC significantly outperforms the TBC in terms of the total phosphorus removed.
In Singapore, Lim et al. developed a modular bioretention tree with a small footprint and a reduced on-site installation time for applications in a tropical environment [19]. The results show that the modular bioretention tree can effectively remove total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP), zinc, copper, cadmium, and lead with removal efficiencies of greater than 90%. A field study in Singapore had a very clean effluent quality. Neo et al. characterized the performances of a rain garden and a vegetated swale that were implemented in a 4 ha urban residential precinct and monitored for a period of 15 months [20]. The results show that total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were low in the new residential precinct runoff. The findings from this study can help us to better understand the performance of source control facilities receiving low influent concentrations and the implications for further investigations that aim to improve stormwater runoff management in the tropics.
In order to evaluate the effect of aquifer recharge on flood control, Meng et al. proposed a sponge city design that highlighted aquifer recharge in a study area in Zhengzhou, China [21]. The stormwater management model of SWMM and the groundwater flow model of MODFlow were adopted to evaluate the flood control effect and aquifer-recharge effect, respectively. The results show that the sponge city design has a positive impact on maintaining groundwater level stabilization and even raises the groundwater level in some specific areas where stormwater seepage infrastructure is located.

3. Conclusions

This Special Issue highlights and discusses topics related to urban runoff control and sponge city construction. During the call period, 22 submissions were received. After the peer review process of the journal, a total of 13 papers were published in this Special Issue. Among the published papers, one review paper presents an in-depth review on sponge city practices in China, from its inception to national pilot construction projects and then to systematic demonstration. Six papers focus on the methods and tools of urban runoff control and sponge city construction, including planning strategies, simulation models, and optimization methods. Six papers concentrate on new findings regarding structures and performances of typical source control facilities, especially bioretention facilities. However, sponge city construction is still a new paradigm in city management; therefore, there are many theoretical, technical and practical problems that need to be addressed and solved, and it is expected that groundbreaking and innovative findings.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all of the contributions to this Special Issue, the time invested by each author, as well as the anonymous reviewers who contributed to the development of the articles in this Special Issue. All the guest editors are very pleased with the review process and management of the Special Issue and offer their gratitude.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jia, H.; Yao, H.; Yu, S. Advances in LID BMPs research and practices for urban runoff control in China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2013, 7, 709–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jia, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhen, X.; Clar, M.; Yu, S. China’s Sponge City Construction: A Discussion on Technical Approaches. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2017, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yin, D.; Chen, Y.; Jia, H.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Xu, C.; Li, Q.; Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Fu, G.; et al. Sponge City Practice in China: A Review of Construction, Assessment, Operational and Maintenance. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, C.; Shi, X.; Jia, M.; Han, Y.; Zhang, R.; Ahmad, S.; Jia, H. China Sponge City database development and urban runoff source control facility configuration comparison between China and the US. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 304, 114241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, Y.; Xu, C.; Yin, D.; Xu, J.; Wu, Y.; Jia, H. Environmental and economic cost-benefit comparison of Sponge City construction in different urban functional regions. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 304, 114230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, C.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Yin, D.; Leng, L.; Jia, H.; Zhang, X.; Xia, J.; Fu, G. Environmental and economic benefit comparison between coupled grey-green infrastructure system and traditional grey one through a life cycle perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 174, 105804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, H.; Liu, Z.; Xu, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xia, J.; Yu, S. Adaptive pressure-driven multi-criteria spatial decision-making for a targeted placement of green and grey runoff control infrastructures. Water Res. 2022, 212, 118126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, T.; Li, K.; Eengel, B.A.; Jia, H.; Leng, L.; Sun, Z.; Yu, S.L. Optimal adaptation pathway for sustainable low impact development planning under deep uncertainty of climate change: A greedy strategy. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 248, 109280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yin, D.; Xu, C.; Jia, H.; Yang, Y.; Sun, C.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S. Sponge City Practices in China: From Pilot Exploration to Systemic Demonstration. Water 2022, 14, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Hou, J.; Jia, H. Decision-Making Framework for GI Layout Considering Site Suitability and Weighted Multi-Function Effectiveness: A Case Study in Beijing Sub-Center. Water 2022, 14, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.; Han, G.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, Y.; Li, J.; Jia, H. Integrated and Control-Oriented Simulation Tool for Optimizing Urban Drainage System Operation. Water 2022, 14, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, Z.; Jin, X.; Sang, W.; Zhang, X. Optimal Design of Combined Sewer Overflows Interception Facilities Based on the NSGA-III Algorithm. Water 2021, 13, 3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Martínez, C.; Vojinovic, Z.; Price, R.; Sanchez, A. Modelling Infiltration Process, Overland Flow and Sewer System Interactions for Urban Flood Mitigation. Water 2021, 13, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. David, L.; Carvalho, R. Designing for People’s Safety on Flooded Streets: Uncertainties and the Influence of the Cross-Section Shape, Roughness and Slopes on Hazard Criteria. Water 2021, 13, 2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, C.; Wang, J.; Li, P.; Wu, B.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Huang, T. A New Strategy for Sponge City Construction of Urban Roads: Combining the Traditional Functions with Landscape and Drainage. Water 2021, 13, 3469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, W.; Ma, H.; Wang, X.; Shao, Z.; He, Q.; Chai, H. Study on the Influence of Sponge Road Bioretention Facility on the Stability of Subgrade Slope. Water 2021, 13, 3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Q.; Jia, H.; Guo, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, G.; Lim, F.; Guo, H.; Neo, T.; Ong, S.; Hu, J. Field Study of the Road Stormwater Runoff Bioretention System with Combined Soil Filter Media and Soil Moisture Conservation Ropes in North China. Water 2022, 14, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ho, C.; Lin, Y. Pollutant Removal Efficiency of a Bioretention Cell with Enhanced Dephosphorization. Water 2022, 14, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lim, F.; Neo, T.; Guo, H.; Goh, S.; Ong, S.; Hu, J.; Lee, B.; Ong, G.; Liou, C. Pilot and Field Studies of Modular Bioretention Tree System with Talipariti tiliaceum and Engineered Soil Filter Media in the Tropics. Water 2021, 13, 1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neo, T.; Xu, D.; Fowdar, H.; McCarthy, D.; Chen, E.; Lee, T.; Ong, G.; Lim, F.; Ong, S.; Hu, J. Evaluation of Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters Design Features in Tropical Urban Cities: A Case Study in Singapore. Water 2022, 14, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, B.; Li, M.; Du, X.; Ye, X. Flood Control and Aquifer Recharge Effects of Sponge City: A Case Study in North China. Water 2022, 14, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Summary of the papers published in the Special Issue “Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction” for the journal Water (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water/special_issues/UrbanRunoff_Control accessed on 13 June 2022).
Table 1. Summary of the papers published in the Special Issue “Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction” for the journal Water (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water/special_issues/UrbanRunoff_Control accessed on 13 June 2022).
Article TypeAuthorsTitleKeywordsStudy Area
General reviewYin, D.; Xu, C.; Jia, H.; et al.“Sponge City Practices in China: From Pilot Exploration to Systemic Demonstration”sponge city; low-impact development; pilot exploration; systematic demonstration; construction scale; stakeholdersChina
Methods and toolsLiu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Hou, J.; et al.“Decision-Making Framework for GI Layout Considering Site Suitability and Weighted Multi-Function Effectiveness: A Case Study in Beijing Sub-Center”multifunctional decision-making framework; cost-effectiveness; site suitability; stakeholders’ preference; green infrastructureBeijing, China
Methods and toolsWang, H.; Han, G.; Zhang, L.; et al.“Integrated and Control-Oriented Simulation Tool for Optimizing Urban Drainage System Operation”control-oriented model; urban drainage system; real-time optimization; Simuwater/
Methods and toolsPeng, Z.; Jin, X.; Sang, W.; et al.“Optimal Design of Combined Sewer Overflows Interception Facilities Based on the NSGA-III Algorithm”combined sewer overflows; optimization; SWMM; NSGA-IIIWuhan, China
Methods and toolsMartínez, C.; Vojinovic, Z.; Price, R.; et al.“Modelling Infiltration Process, Overland Flow and Sewer System Interactions for Urban Flood Mitigation”Green-Ampt method; infiltration; overland flow; urban flood modelling; 1D/2D coupled modelling/
Methods and toolsDavid, L.; Carvalho, R.“Designing for People’s Safety on Flooded Streets: Uncertainties and the Influence of the Cross-Section Shape, Roughness and Slopes on Hazard Criteria”dual drainage modelling; extreme rainfall; flooding; safety criteria; urban drainage; uncertainty/
Methods and toolsWei, C.; Wang, J.; Li, P.; et al.“A New Strategy for Sponge City Construction of Urban Roads: Combining the Traditional Functions with Landscape and Drainage”urban water management; drainage function; permeable pavement; biological retentionSuzhou, China.
Typical source control facilityTang, W.; Ma, H.; Wang, X.; et al.“Study on the Influence of Sponge Road Bioretention Facility on the Stability of Subgrade Slope”sponge city; bioretention facility; rain infiltration; slope stabilityChongqing, China
Typical source control facilityLi, Q.; Jia, H.; Guo, H.; et al.“Field Study of the Road Stormwater Runoff Bioretention System with Combined Soil Filter Media and Soil Moisture Conservation Ropes in North China”modified bioretention facility; road stormwater runoff; combined soil filter media; soil moisture conservation rope; field study; microbial diversityTianjin, China
Typical source control facilityHo, C.; Lin, Y.“Pollutant Removal Efficiency of a Bioretention Cell with Enhanced Dephosphorization”low impact development; Sustainable Development Goals; non-point source pollution; enhanced dephosphorization bioretentionHefei, China
Typical source control facilityLim, F.; Neo, T.; Guo, H.; et al.“Pilot and Field Studies of Modular Bioretention Tree System with Talipariti tiliaceum and Engineered Soil Filter Media in the Tropics”urban runoff remediation; Talipariti tiliaceum; modular bioretention tree; field study; tree-pitSingapore
Typical source control facilityNeo, T.; Xu, D.; Fowdar, H.; et al.“Evaluation of Active, Beautiful, Clean Waters Design Features in Tropical Urban Cities: A Case Study in Singapore”urban stormwater runoff management; field monitoring; ABC Waters design features; water quality; bioretention; swalesSingapore
Typical source control facilityMeng, B.; Li, M.; Du, X.; et al.“Flood Control and Aquifer Recharge Effects of Sponge City: A Case Study in North China”Sponge City; aquifer recharge; urban stormwater; green infrastructureZhengzhou, China
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, H.; Hu, J.; Huang, T.; Chen, A.S.; Ma, Y. Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction. Water 2022, 14, 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121910

AMA Style

Jia H, Hu J, Huang T, Chen AS, Ma Y. Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction. Water. 2022; 14(12):1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Haifeng, Jiangyong Hu, Tianyin Huang, Albert S. Chen, and Yukun Ma. 2022. "Urban Runoff Control and Sponge City Construction" Water 14, no. 12: 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop