Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:23:54.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why White Americans More Frequently Fail to View the Police Critically

A Subtle but Vital Shift in Focus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Kevin Drakulich*
Affiliation:
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University
Eric Rodriguez-Whitney
Affiliation:
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University
Jesenia Robles
Affiliation:
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: k.drakulich@northeastern.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It matters how people view the police—and that there is a substantial racial gap in these views. Research has primarily focused on police experiences to explain generally less-positive views among Black Americans. We recommend a subtle but vital shift in focus, seeking instead to explain the remarkably more favorable average views about the police among White Americans. Utilizing comparable data from two 2016 American National Election Studies surveys, we explore the role of contact with the police, politics, and three different dimensions of racial attitudes and views, finding views about the police among White Americans to be shaped in primary ways by concerns about Black Americans. These factors, and racial resentment in particular, explain a significant portion of the average difference in views of the police between Black and White Americans. We discuss the implications of this subtle shift in focus, particularly for work which sets positive views about the police as the goal.

Type
State of the Art
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hutchins Center for African and African American Research

Introduction

It matters how people view the police—the gatekeepers of the criminal justice system and representatives of the power of the state. Those who lack faith in the police or who see the police as biased feel less safe in their own neighborhood (e.g., Drakulich Reference Drakulich2013). People’s experiences with and views about the police shape their broader views of the government and the civic body, as well as their participation in it (Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Hagan, Johnson and Wozniak2017, Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2020; Lerman and Weaver, Reference Lerman and Weaver2014), evoking a sense of social and legal estrangement (Bell Reference Bell2017; McLemore Reference McLemore2019). Perceptions of police inefficacy or injustice may even increase crime itself by reducing willingness to act informally against crime or by encouraging extralegal resolutions to problems (Anderson Reference Anderson1999; Drakulich and Crutchfield, Reference Drakulich and Crutchfield2013; Kirk and Papachristos, Reference Kirk and Papachristos2011).

It is notable, then, that the most consistent finding in research on views about the police is the identification of substantial differences in these views across racial lines. A recent meta-review of ninety-two studies found that people of color—and particular Black Americans—held consistently lower evaluations of the police than non-Hispanic White Americans across a wide variety of different dimensions of views about the police (Peck Reference Peck2015). In particular, Black Americans are more likely to view the police as racially biased and unfair (e.g., Hagan et al., Reference Hagan, Shedd and Payne2005), and less likely to express overall support or confidence in the police (e.g., Ekins Reference Ekins2016; Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Wilson, Maguire and Lowrey-Kinberg2017).

These racial differences in views of the police have received substantial public attention for decades (e.g., Braga et al., Reference Braga, Brunson and Drakulich2019; Krauss Reference Krauss1994). Statements about the need to improve police-community relations, particularly for communities of color, appear on the websites of nearly every organization that works with or does research on the police (e.g., Law Enforcement Action Partnership, 2017; Thomas Reference Thomas2016), and these issues were central concerns for the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (President’s Task Force 2015). The issue has received particular attention as the Black Lives Matter social movement has sought to bring greater attention to issues of police violence and anti-Black racism (Black Lives Matter, n.d.; Garza Reference Garza and Hobson2016).

The key question is what explains this considerable racial gap in views about the police. A substantial portion of the work trying to explain views about the police has focused on contact with the police. In general, Black Americans have more negative experiences with the police (e.g., Baumgartner et al., Reference Baumgartner, Epp and Shoub2018; Crutchfield et al., Reference Crutchfield, Skinner, Haggerty, McGlynn and Catalano2012; Gelman et al., Reference Gelman, Fagan and Kiss2007; Voigt et al., Reference Voigt, Camp, Prabhakaran, Hamilton, Hetey, Griffiths, Jurgens, Jurafsky and Eberhardt2017) and are more likely to be shot or killed by the police while unarmed (e.g., Correll et al., Reference Correll, Park, Judd, Wittenbrink, Sadler and Keesee2007; Nix et al., Reference Nix, Campbell, Byers and Alpert2017; Ross Reference Ross2015). These negative experiences translate to more critical evaluations of the police (e.g., Flexon et al., Reference Flexon, Lurigio and Greenleaf2009; Skogan Reference Skogan2006). Young Black men in particular tend to accumulate negative experiences with the police which shape their more negative evaluations of the police (e.g., Brunson Reference Brunson2007), and vicarious experiences—the experiences of friends and family members—appear important to shaping views about the police more broadly (e.g., Gau and Brunson, Reference Gau and Brunson2010; Warren Reference Warren2011).

More positive views about the police are the goal of research, advocacy, and policy-work on procedural justice—the idea that police can improve how they are viewed by the communities they work in by demonstrating neutrality, encouraging voice or participation, treating people with respect and dignity, and conveying trustworthy motives (e.g., Mazerolle et al., Reference Mazerolle, Bennett, Davis, Sargeant and Manning2013; Schulhofer et al., Reference Schulhofer, Tyler and Huq2011; Tyler Reference Tyler2017). On the other side, when people view the police as biased and untrustworthy, the concern shared by these perspectives is that people may not cooperate with the police or obey the police or the law (Tyler Reference Tyler2006; Tyler and Fagan, Reference Tyler and Fagan2008; Tyler and Jackson, Reference Tyler and Jackson2014). Put simply, this perspective highlights positive views about the police as the ideal or goal, and negative views or perceptions of police bias as a problem to be addressed. Applied to racial differences in views about the police, the implication is that the generally favorable views about the police held by the average white American is the goal, and that we should be concerned that bad experiences with the police are preventing Black Americans from having similarly positive views.Footnote 1

However, we argue people’s views about the police may be rooted in more than personal or vicarious experiences with the police. Views about the police are social and political constructions, the target of collective action framing efforts. This is especially the case when the police—and racial biases in policing specifically—are relevant to political and social conflict. In both the Civil Rights and Black Lives Matter Eras, movement actors sought to bring problematic and biased police behavior to public attention (e.g., Taylor Reference Taylor2016). In response to Black Lives Matter, Blue Lives Matter counter-framing efforts sought to rally support for the police. When racial gaps in police treatment receive public attention—and when both these gaps and the police themselves become the subject of partisan political debate (Healy and Burns, Reference Healy and Burns2016)—views about the police are not likely to be just the product of experiences with the police but will also be related to views of race and political identities. Thus, we join a growing number of studies examining how views about the police may be rooted in political and racial attitudes (Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Matsueda and Drakulich, Reference Matsueda and Drakulich2009; Peffley and Hurwitz, Reference Peffley and Hurwitz2010; Wozniak Reference Wozniak2016), and in doing so we recommend a subtle but important shift in framing the questions we ask about public views of the police.

While many prior studies focus on explaining less favorable views about the police among Black Americans, we suggest a shift in this focus to explaining the remarkably more favorable views about the police among many White Americans. Specifically, in the aftermath of a series of widely covered police shootings of Black Americans, a civil rights social movement focused on police racial bias, and a national presidential election in which the police and race become a debated issue, what does it mean to support the police? Rather than focus on a deficit in enthusiasm for the police among Black Americans, we suggest it is worth more directly considering the deficit in critical views of the police among White Americans. To this end, we investigate whether people’s views about the police are rooted in their racial and political views, and whether these views help explain some of the general racial gap in views about the police.

Explaining Views About the Police

A large number of prior studies focus on explaining views about the police as a function of experiences with the police. Given the generally more negative experiences Black Americans have with the police, this has obvious value in understanding why Black Americans view the police with greater concern. This explanation also has clear policy implications: that police policies and practices must be changed to improve the experiences Black Americans have with the police (e.g., President’s Task Force 2015). In this light, lower evaluations of the police among Black Americans are rational reactions to a worse set of experiences with the police relative to White Americans.Footnote 2

However, this approach treats generally high support among White Americans as the default, explaining it merely as a lack of erosion from negative experiences with the police. In reversing the question, we treat it instead as something worth explaining directly. To do so we develop an explanation that goes beyond the mere absence of contact with the police.

Instead, we suggest that people’s views about the police are at least in part social and political constructions (e.g., Baranauskas and Drakulich, Reference Baranauskas and Drakulich2018; Beckett and Sasson, Reference Beckett and Sasson2004; Berger and Luckmann, Reference Berger and Luckmann1990; Chermak and Weiss, Reference Chermak and Weiss2005; Ericson Reference Ericson1989; Kasinsky Reference Kasinsky1995; Rafter Reference Rafter1990). Views about the police have symbolic and expressive meaning (Jackson and Bradford, Reference Jackson and Bradford2009; Jackson and Sunshine, Reference Jackson and Sunshine2007). People, for instance, display Black Lives Matter signs in their yards or thin blue line flags on their cars. The views themselves are also the targets of active and contested collective action framing efforts (Benford and Snow, Reference Benford and Snow2000; Goffman Reference Goffman1974). We expect that views about the police are shaped by other political and racial views, especially in the context of racial biases in policing receiving public attention in ways that are contested across political party lines.

This may happen, in part, naturally: beliefs about whether the police act in racially biased ways are likely to be rooted in broader understandings of the meaning and importance of race, for instance. But these connections may also be actively encouraged by social movement actors seeking to rally support around particular understandings of the issue (Benford and Snow, Reference Benford and Snow2000), particularly social movements which “shape, and are shaped by, conceptions of race and ethnicity” (Owens et al., Reference Owens, McVeigh, Cunningham, Snow, Soule, Kriesi and McCammon2019, p. 566), including both racist (e.g., Cunningham Reference Cunningham2013; McVeigh Reference McVeigh2009) and anti-racist movements (e.g., Taylor Reference Taylor2016). Movement actors seek to strategically design frames that construct a particular understanding of an issue, assign blame for problems, and point towards specific solutions (Benford and Snow, Reference Benford and Snow2000) in a way that resonates broadly (Snow and Benford, Reference Snow and Benford1988) through strategies such as building bridges between ideologically congruent frames or by tapping into existing cultural beliefs or narratives (Snow et al., Reference Snow, Rochford, Worden and Benford1986). For example, Black Lives Matter organizations may seek to emphasize broad individual rights themes rather than narrower identity issues to promote their framing of racial inequality and police bias (Tillery Reference Tillery2019). On the other side, some political actors appeared to tap into racial anxieties in a counter-framing in support of the police (Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2020).

Politics

There are several reasons to expect that people’s political identities may influence their views about the police. While it may seem obvious that people would pick the politician or party that best fits their political positions, there is evidence that the reverse is true: that people pick a politician or party and then adopt the corresponding policy views (Lenz Reference Lenz2012). This appears to have happened during the 2016 election on issues related to Black Lives Matter and immigration (Enns and Jardina, Reference Enns and Jardina2021). Political actors may also seek to actively shape public understandings of the police through framing processes, including building bridges to congruent frames within a political ideology or amplifying core symbolic values or positions relevant to the frame. This is significant because many political actors took explicit positions on the police as Black Lives Matter protests took place across the country. In particular, many Republican and conservative political actors expressed pro-police rhetoric (Alcindor Reference Alcindor2016; Campbell Reference Campbell2015; Parker Reference Parker2016) while some Democratic and liberal political actors expressed support for the Black Lives Matter movement and its core concerns (Bouie Reference Bouie2015; Glanton Reference Glanton2016; Grawert Reference Grawert2016).

However, political identities may also be endogenous to some of the other factors considered here, in particular racial animus and racial resentment (Drakulich Reference Drakulich2015a; Matsueda et al., Reference Matsueda, Drakulich, Hagan, Krivo, Peterson, Aldrich and McGraw2011). Historically, the Republican ‘southern strategy’ was an explicit effort to recruit voters uncomfortable with changing race relations to the party (Beckett and Sasson, Reference Beckett and Sasson2004; Tonry Reference Tonry2011). More recently, racial animus or racial resentment appeared to play a role in vote choice in the 2008 election (e.g., Krupnikov and Piston, Reference Krupnikov and Piston2015), the rise of the tea party (e.g., Hochschild Reference Hochschild2016; Tope et al., Reference Tope, Pickett and Chiricos2015), and the 2016 election (Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Hagan, Johnson and Wozniak2017, Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2020; Sides et al., Reference Sides, Tesler and Vavreck2018).

Racism

When accusations of racial disparities in policing receive substantial public attention, views about the police may also be shaped by understandings of race and race relations. Several different kinds of racial views may matter, each of which has different implications for understanding racial differences in views about the police.

First, views about the police may be shaped by racial crime stereotypes. Stereotypes of Black Americans as dangerous and criminal extend back to the arrival of the first African slaves in the Americas in the early 1600s. In “illegally resist[ing] legal slavery” they were “stamped from the beginning as criminals” (Kendi Reference Kendi2017). The legal institution of chattel slavery, the Slave Codes, the Fugitive Slave Act, the Black Codes, and the Jim Crow laws all explicitly criminalized Blackness—creating a list of crimes that by definition only Black Americans could commit (e.g., Alexander Reference Alexander2020; Blackmon Reference Blackmon2009; Kendi Reference Kendi2017). After the end of legal segregation and discrimination, new laws and policies designed to disproportionately impact Black Americans replicated the racial control and exploitation functions of legal segregation and discrimination, but in superficially non-racial terms (e.g., Alexander Reference Alexander2020; Baptist Reference Baptist2016; Bonilla-Silva Reference Bonilla-Silva2018; Rothstein Reference Rothstein2017; Taylor Reference Taylor2019; Wacquant Reference Wacquant, Blomberg and Cohen2003). This includes police policies and practices that disproportionately target Black over White criminal behavior (e.g., Beckett et al., Reference Beckett, Nyrop and Pfingst2006),Footnote 3 as well as sentencing policies including the infamous 100:1 crack-cocaine disparity (Coyle Reference Coyle2002). The result is disproportionate involvement in the criminal justice system, and a corresponding emphasis on the statistics of Black criminality, which Khalil Gibran Muhammad (Reference Muhammad2010) points out began within decades of the end of legal slavery.

Consequently, stereotypes of Black Americans as criminal or violent are pervasive. Americans tend to overestimate the amount of crime in communities with more Black residents (Quillian and Pager, Reference Quillian and Pager2001), a phenomenon explained in part by explicitly held stereotypes of Black Americans as more criminal (Drakulich Reference Drakulich2012). Many Americans possess a racial typification of crime, viewing it as a primarily Black phenomenon (Chiricos et al., Reference Chiricos, Welch and Gertz2004; Pickett et al., Reference Pickett, Chiricos, Golden and Gertz2012). Katheryn Russell-Brown (Reference Russell-Brown1998) describes an irrational fear of young Black men in particular, which she describes as the ‘myth of the criminalblackman’ (see also Young Reference Young, Peterson, Krivo and Hagan2006). Those who believe that Black Americans are more criminal or violent may be more likely to see disproportionate unjustified stops of or excessive force against Black citizens as justified. They may express support for the police even in a moment when the police are accused of racial biases. However, many theories of racism suggest that specific prejudicial attitudes like stereotypes are the product of deeper concerns about racial group positions (Blumer Reference Blumer1958) or a justification for existing inequalities or discriminatory practices.Footnote 4 In other words, these views may be more symptom than disease.

Second, and perhaps most simply, views about the police may be influenced by racial affect. A variety of work emphasizes the importance of racial group affect, often tied to racial closure or segregation. W. E. B. Du Bois (Reference Du Bois1899) discusses a “natural repugnance to close intermingling” (p. 394) of Black Americans by White Americans as the antecedent of discrimination. A half-century later, the contact hypothesis describes the in-group processes that lead to negative intergroup feelings and suggests positive intergroup contact as the solution (Allport Reference Allport1954). Those White Americans who lack affinity for Black Americans may be less likely to believe or be concerned by stories of police racial bias, and those who dislike or hate Black Americans may even welcome the thought of police abuses. However, as with stereotypes, a lack of affinity or presence of hate may be the product rather than source of racial discrimination (e.g., Kendi Reference Kendi2017). Additionally, racial animus may reflect an overt and explicit racism that appears to have declined significantly since the Civil Rights Era (Krysan and Moberg, Reference Krysan and Moberg2016; Schuman et al., Reference Schuman, Steeh and Bobo1985).

Third, views about the police may be the product of more instrumental racial views (e.g., Blumer Reference Blumer1958). A long history of policies establishing the legal exploitation and racial separation of Black Americans were justified with an explicitly racial logic emphasizing the inherent inferiority of Black people (e.g., Alexander Reference Alexander2020; Blackmon Reference Blackmon2009; Bobo and Smith, Reference Bobo, Smith, Katkin, Landsman and Tyree1998; Kendi Reference Kendi2017; Wacquant Reference Wacquant, Blomberg and Cohen2003). The Civil Rights movement challenged the laws codifying racial discrimination and the explicit racial logic justifying it. This challenge necessitated the formation of a new racial logic (e.g., Bobo et al., Reference Bobo, Kluegel, Smith, Tuch and Martin1997; Jackman and Muha, Reference Jackman and Muha1984) to justify a new set of policies and practices that served to maintain racial inequalities (e.g., Bonilla-Silva Reference Bonilla-Silva2018; Rothstein Reference Rothstein2017; Taylor Reference Taylor2019). This new racial logic, described as modern, symbolic (Sears Reference Sears, Katz and Taylor1988; Sears and McConahay, Reference Sears and McConahay1973), laissez-faire (Bobo et al., Reference Bobo, Kluegel, Smith, Tuch and Martin1997), or colorblind racism (Bonilla-Silva Reference Bonilla-Silva2018) still serves to justify racial inequalities but does so while explicitly eschewing race.

This racial logic—a dismissal of the relevance of slavery and discrimination, a belief that racial disparities are the product of Black deficiencies, and a resentment of efforts to ameliorate inequalities—may be relevant to views about the police. Part of the logic is an intentional dismissal of historical and contemporary discrimination. Consistent with this, adherents may dismiss the existence of police racial bias. Those holding these views may also express strong support for the police, who serve as symbolic defenders of the racial order, and who have also long been used as a racist dog whistle, a way of signaling to those uncomfortable with challenges to the racial status quo without explicitly invoking race (Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2020; Haney-López Reference Haney-López2014). Consistent with the modern racism logic, this eschews explicit references to race, while still supporting an institution engaged in the symbolic defense of the racial order.

These three forms of racism have different implications. If crime stereotypes alone are relevant to views about the police, this may reflect a stigma rooted in the historical correlations between communities of color and social problems rather than one rooted in prejudice or racial hostility (e.g., Sampson Reference Sampson2009, and see discussion in Drakulich and Siller, Reference Drakulich, Siller, Johnson, Warren and Farrell2015). As Erving Goffman (Reference Goffman1963) suggests, stigma may be driven more by ignorance than intentions of harm. If views about the police were solely related to a lack of affinity for Black people, this tells a more problematic story, though if this lack of affinity is the result of a lack of positive interracial contact (e.g., Allport Reference Allport1954), this may also be a story rooted in ignorance rather than intention. Alternatively, if the modern racist logic—a racial resentment of Black Americans—is relevant to views about the police, this suggests a story rooted less in mere ignorance and more in group interest. In this last explanation, racial stereotypes and animosities may exist as symptoms of or justifications for more instrumental racial concerns.

Prior Research: What Do We Know About Views About the Police?

A substantial volume of research exists on how civilians view the police, from which several clear stories emerge. First, as described in the introduction, it matters how people view the police. The consequences of a lack of faith in the police—at the individual or community-level—are central to work on police injustice (e.g., Hagan and Albonetti, Reference Hagan and Albonetti1982), procedural justice (e.g., Tyler Reference Tyler2006), legal cynicism (e.g., Kirk and Papachristos, Reference Kirk and Papachristos2011), and legal estrangement (Bell Reference Bell2017), as well as to broader work on marginalization or people’s trust in government more generally (e.g., Lerman and Weaver, Reference Lerman and Weaver2014).

Second, views about the police are multi-dimensional. Work has focused on perceived biases in police behavior particularly across racial lines (e.g., Weitzer and Tuch, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2002) and perceptions of police misconduct, misbehavior, or corruption (e.g., Weitzer and Tuch, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2004). Collectively, bias and misconduct—whether the police disproportionately stop without justification or use excessive force against some group of people, for instance—constitute perceived police injustice (Hagan et al., Reference Hagan, Shedd and Payne2005; Hagan and Albonetti, Reference Hagan and Albonetti1982). Still other work investigates trust in the police or perceptions of police legitimacy (e.g., Tyler Reference Tyler2005), perceptions of police effectiveness or satisfaction (e.g., Dowler and Sparks, Reference Dowler and Sparks2008), or more general assessments including support for or favorability towards the police (e.g., Ekins Reference Ekins2016). Collectively, these different dimensions may represent an interpretive package of related frames of the police (Benford and Snow, Reference Benford and Snow2000; Drakulich Reference Drakulich2015a; Gamson Reference Gamson1988; Gamson and Modigliani, Reference Gamson and Modigliani1989).

Third, views about the police are highly stratified along racial lines (Peck Reference Peck2015). There are large differences in particular between White and Black Americans (e.g., Brunson and Weitzer, Reference Brunson and Weitzer2009; Warren Reference Warren2011; Weitzer Reference Weitzer2000; Weitzer and Tuch, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2002, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2004, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2006). Beyond individual racial differences, the racial composition of communities appears to matter (e.g., Brunson and Weitzer, Reference Brunson and Weitzer2009). For example, critical views of the police are more common in communities with more Black residents but these critical views are not exclusive to Black residents within those communities (Drakulich Reference Drakulich2013; Drakulich and Crutchfield, Reference Drakulich and Crutchfield2013; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Sun and Triplett2009).

Fourth, a substantial literature suggests experiences with the police tend to be relevant to views about the police. A variety of work suggests that personal experiences with the police influence views about the police (Brunson Reference Brunson2007; Brunson and Weitzer, Reference Brunson and Weitzer2009; Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Dowler and Sparks, Reference Dowler and Sparks2008; Gau and Brunson, Reference Gau and Brunson2010; Hagan et al., Reference Hagan, Shedd and Payne2005; Weitzer and Tuch, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2002, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2004, Reference Weitzer and Tuch2005; Wortley et al., Reference Wortley, Hagan and Macmillan1997). Although individual incidents appear impactful, the accumulation of these experiences may matter more (Brunson Reference Brunson2007). Additionally, vicarious experiences—the accounts of families and friends who have had encounters with the police—also influence views about the police (Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Gau and Brunson, Reference Gau and Brunson2010; Warren Reference Warren2011). Consistent with this narrative, the procedural justice literature suggests a lack of racial differences in the relationship between procedural justice and legitimacy or cooperation, and in the meaning of fairness, implying that differences are rooted instead in the differential likelihood of being treated in a procedurally unjust manner (Tyler Reference Tyler2005; Tyler and Huo, Reference Tyler and Huo2002).

Fifth, a smaller literature suggests political views may be relevant to views about the police. Those who identify either as a Republican or as conservative appear less likely to view the police as biased or unjust (Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Matsueda and Drakulich, Reference Matsueda and Drakulich2009; Pickett et al., Reference Pickett, Nix and Roche2018; Wozniak et al., Reference Wozniak, Drakulich and Calfano2020), less likely to believe they use excessive force or otherwise misbehave (Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Wozniak et al., Reference Wozniak, Drakulich and Calfano2020), and generally like, support, or express confidence in the police (Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Cao et al., Reference Cao, Stack and Sun1998; Fine et al., Reference Fine, Rowan and Simmons2019; Wozniak et al., Reference Wozniak, Drakulich and Calfano2020; Zamble and Annesley, Reference Zamble and Annesley1987). Those identifying as Republican or conservative are also more likely to hold related views, such as supporting police use of force or racial profiling (Gabbidon et al., Reference Gabbidon, Penn, Jordan and Higgins2009; Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Brazier, Forrest, Ketelhut, Mason and Mitchell2011; Silver and Pickett, Reference Silver and Pickett2015), and opposing Black Lives Matter (Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2021; Updegrove et al., Reference Updegrove, Cooper, Orrick and Piquero2020).

Sixth, a smaller (relative to work on experiences with the police) but particularly important literature suggests racial views may be relevant to views about the police. Several studies look directly at the question of the role of racism in people’s views of whether the police are biased (Matsueda and Drakulich, Reference Matsueda and Drakulich2009; Peffley and Hurwitz, Reference Peffley and Hurwitz2010), or engage in problematic behavior like excessive force, or generally support or have confidence in the police (Wozniak Reference Wozniak2016). Some work does show evidence of a role for some measure of racial animus or racism for related views, such as support for the idea of police use of force (Barkan and Cohn, Reference Barkan and Cohn1998; Carter et al., Reference Carter, Corra and Jenks2016; Carter and Corra, Reference Carter and Corra2016; Johnson and Kuhns, Reference Johnson and Kuhns2009; Pickett Reference Pickett2016; Silver and Pickett, Reference Silver and Pickett2015), the justifiability of police shootings (Strickler and Lawson, Reference Strickler and Lawson2020), support for protest policing (Metcalfe and Pickett, Reference Metcalfe and Pickett2022), as well as the desire to increase spending on law enforcement (Drakulich Reference Drakulich2015b; Matsueda and Drakulich, Reference Matsueda and Drakulich2009; Morris and LeCount, Reference Morris and LeCount2020). There is a larger number of studies suggesting the relevance of racial views to punitive attitudes (e.g., Bobo and Johnson, Reference Bobo and Johnson2004; Drakulich Reference Drakulich2015b; Johnson Reference Johnson2008; Unnever and Cullen, Reference Unnever and Cullen2010). Research that does focus on the role of racism rarely compares multiple potential dimensions of racism (though see Drakulich Reference Drakulich2015b; Matsueda and Drakulich, Reference Matsueda and Drakulich2009).

We see these last two emerging literatures—exploring the political and racial forces shaping views about the police—as reflecting a fundamentally different question than the first. It is for this reason we are suggesting a subtle but important reframing of the question, moving from a focus on a Black deficit in enthusiasm for the police on average to more intentional efforts to explain the unusually positive average views—and the deficit on average in critical views—about the police among White Americans.

Research Questions

We are interested in factors that help explain views about the police. More specifically, we are interested in those factors which help explain differences in views about the police between Black and White Americans—that mediate the role of race in explaining views about the police.

We are interested in people’s views about the police at a specific moment in time—in the midst of a social movement focused broadly on racial equality and specifically on police treatment of Black citizens (Cobbina Reference Cobbina2019; Garza Reference Garza and Hobson2016). Given this, we focus on two dimensions of views about the police: one specific to these issues, and one more general. First, we are interested specifically in how people see the police acting along racial lines; whether they view them as misbehaving in racially discriminatory ways. This kind of question is central to prior work on perceived police injustice (e.g., Hagan and Albonetti, Reference Hagan and Albonetti1982; Matsueda et al., Reference Matsueda, Drakulich, Hagan, Krivo, Peterson, Aldrich and McGraw2011), and the question of perceived bias is relevant to work on procedural justice (e.g., Sunshine and Tyler, Reference Sunshine and Tyler2003; Tyler Reference Tyler2017). Second, we are interested in a more general affective support—whether people generally feel favorably toward the police or not, a measure used in prior work focused variously on explaining views of police use of force, procedural justice, and political behavior (Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2020; Kahn et al., Reference Kahn, Thompson and McMahon2017; Mason Reference Mason2018; Peyton et al., Reference Peyton, Sierra-Arévalo and Rand2019).

As discussed above, we are interested in investigating two broad sets of explanations for these views. The first is that people’s views about the police will be influenced by their experiences or contact with the police. We focus on three possible dimensions. First, the simple experience of being stopped and questioned by the police. Second, vicariously experienced stops someone hears about from family or friends. Third, police-citizen interactions that end in more severe consequences for the citizen, such as an arrest or even time in jail or prison. We also explore a potential role for racially discriminatory experiences with the police in the Appendix.

These factors, however, are best suited to explain the Black ‘deficit’ in positive views about the police. For this reason, we also seek to explore how views about the police may reflect political identities or feelings about race or understandings of race relations—explanations better suited to explaining the unusually positive average views about the police among White Americans. For politics, we explore the role of political ideology as well as party identification. For views on race, we explore each of the dimensions outlined above: stereotypes about Black violence, racial affinity, and racial resentment (a view involving a dismissal of the relevance of historical or contemporary discrimination, the blaming of racial inequalities on Black deficiencies, and a resentment of efforts to ameliorate those inequalities).

Data, Measures, and Methods

Data

To explore the role of politics and racial attitudes in views about the police, we focus on a time when the police—and specifically the question of racial discrimination by the police—were a part of the national conversation: the 2016 presidential election. A series of deaths of Black Americans at the hands of the police between 2014 and 2016 received substantial public attention and sparked mass protests (Gately and Stolberg, Reference Gately and Stolberg2015; Thorsen and Giegerich, Reference Thorsen and Giegerich2014), out of which emerged organizing work by a diverse coalition broadly under the Black Lives Matter banner (Boyles Reference Boyles2019; Cobbina Reference Cobbina2019). These issues made their way first to the presidential primaries and then to the general election campaigns during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.

We explore our questions in data from two different surveys. Both surveys were conducted by the same organization around the 2016 election. One is designed to be nationally representative while the other is weighted to reflect the national population on key demographic and political dimensions. The surveys differ in their sampling strategies, interview formats, and in the precise wording of key questions. This allows us to replicate the results within a single paper and protect against false positives (Murayama et al., Reference Murayama, Pekrun and Fielder2014; and see Pickett et al., Reference Pickett, Chiricos, Golden and Gertz2012; Quillian and Pager, Reference Quillian and Pager2001; Roche et al., Reference Roche, Pickett and Gertz2016).

The first survey—the ANES 2016 Pilot Survey (American National Election Studies, 2016) was conducted in late January 2016, just before primary voting began in early February. The ANES collected surveys from 1200 respondents and included weights designed to make the sample representative of the larger population of U.S. citizens aged eighteen or older on the basis of age, gender, race-ethnicity, education, region, and party identification (all results include these weights). The survey was conducted over the internet drawing on respondents from an existing panel.Footnote 5

The second survey is the from the 2016 American National Election Studies Time Series Survey (American National Election Studies, 2017), conducted in two waves: the first in the two months prior to the general election and the second in the two months after the election (DeBell et al., Reference DeBell, Amsbary, Meldener, Brock and Maisel2018). The post-election interview included 1059 face-to-face interviews and 2590 online interviews. All models include a control for the mode of interview and are weighted to adjust for sample attrition and ensure the sample reflects the U.S. 18-plus population.

As our interest is specifically in explaining the differences in views between White and Black Americans, for simplicity and space we restrict both samples to those individuals who identify as non-Hispanic White or Black.Footnote 6

Measures

Perceptions of the Police. First, we are interested in whether people believe that the police regularly act in racially discriminatory ways toward Black versus White Americans. In the ANES 2016 Pilot Study (APS), this is captured by a combination of five separate measures. Two measures ask respondents how often they think police officers stop White and Black people, respectively, on the street without good reason, each on five-category scales from never to very often. We subtract the first of these from the second to produce a measure of how much more people think the police stop Black relative to White people. We do the same for two questions on identical scales asking respondents how often they thought the police used “more force than is necessary under the circumstances” when dealing with White and Black people, respectively. A final question is posed more broadly, asking respondents in general about whether the police treat ‘Whites’ or ‘Blacks’ better on a seven-point scale. Although we initially examined these three measures separately, they were highly related to each other, seeming to reflect a single latent perception of police racial discrimination. As such, we constructed a final measure as the average of standardized scores for the three measures.Footnote 7

Table 1 presents means, standard deviations, and the number of missing values for each measure used in the APS. For the measures of perceived discrimination in police stops and use of force, the small but positive mean suggests the average respondent falls somewhere between believing the police are not at all discriminatory (a score of zero) and believing they discriminate a little more against Black versus White people (the measures range from -4:4). Similarly, the mean just above 5 in the general police discrimination measure suggests the average respondent believes the police treat White people “a little” better than Black people. The fourth measure—“perceived police discrimination (combined)”—is the average of the standardized scores for the previous three.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for APS

Total possible N=1010

The ANES 2016 Time Series Study (ATS) includes just the third and broadest question about police discrimination: whether the police, in general, “treat Whites better than Blacks, treat them both same, or treat Blacks better than Whites” on a seven point scale ranging from treating Black people much better to treating White people much better. The average response is similar to that in the APS: an agreement that the police treat White people “a little” better than Black people (Table 2).

Table 2. Descriptive statistics for ATS

Total possible N=2974

For our second outcome of interest, we move from specific assessments of police racial bias to more general feelings of support or affection for the police. Both surveys use identical questions to capture general feelings of affective support for the police: a “thermometer scale” question, a common format in political science research to gauge affective support for individuals, groups, or issues (Nelson Reference Nelson and Lavrakas2008). Respondents were asked to rate their feelings toward a list of groups on a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with 0 representing very cold and unfavorable feelings and 100 representing very warm or favorable feelings. Among these, respondents were asked specifically how warmly or coldly they felt toward “the police.” In both surveys, respondents rated the police, on average, relatively warmly: about a 70 or 75 on the 100-point scale (Tables 1 and 2). In both studies a standard deviation of around 25 suggests a wide diversity of feelings towards the police among the respondents.

Contact with the police. Each survey attempts to capture experiences with the police, though they use slightly different methods and questions to do so. Notably, these measures capture whether the respondent has had these kinds of contacts and not the quality of that contact (although the Appendix explores the question of explicitly negative experiences). In the APS, respondents were asked whether they were stopped or questioned by a police officer, whether they had family members stopped or questioned, and whether they had spent a night in jail or prison. The sample was randomly divided with half of the respondents being asked whether this contact had occurred in the last twelve months and the other half being asked if this kind of contact had ever occurred. Given this, we treat these two groups as separate samples, and report analyses separately. Not surprisingly, many more respondents reported they had ever had personal or vicarious contact with the police (more than half in both cases) than did those reporting on the last year (around twenty percent for each). Similarly, only two percent had spent a night in jail or prison in the past year relative to seventeen percent ever (Table 1).

In the ATS, all the respondents were asked the same questions. In a single question, respondents were asked if they or any of their family members had been stopped or questioned by a police officer in the last twelve months—a combined measure of personal and vicarious contact. Roughly a quarter of respondents said yes (Table 2). A second question asks whether the respondent has ever been arrested (a potentially less severe kind of contact than spending a night in jail or prison). Roughly a fifth of respondents said yes (Table 2).

Politics. To capture political ideology, two standard measures were employed in each study: identification as more liberal or conservative and identification as more Democrat or Republican, each on seven-point scales. The average respondent rated themselves roughly in the middle of both scales (Tables 1 and 2).

Racial attitudes. We explore three different kinds of racial attitudes. The first are violent crime stereotypes. In the APS, respondents were asked to rate “how well does the word “violent” describe most members from this group?” on a five-point scale from “not well at all” to “extremely well” separately asking about “Blacks” and “Whites.” The resulting measure is the difference between these ratings, reflecting how much better they thought violence characterized Black relative to White people. In the ATS, respondents were asked where they would rate “Whites” and “Blacks,” respectively, on seven-point scales from peaceful to violent. Once again, the former was subtracted from the latter. The small positive means for both indicate that the average respondent would rate them relatively equally, while leaning towards Black people being more violent (Tables 1 and 2). The standard deviations, however, suggest there is substantial variability in these ratings across respondents.

In both studies, racial affect is captured using thermometer scales on which respondents are asked to rate their feelings, separately, towards “Blacks” and “Whites” on scales from 0-100. We take the difference between the two creating a measure reflecting how much more coldly the respondent ranks “Blacks” relative to “Whites.” The average respondent in both studies rates Black people about three to five points more coldly than White people, though in both cases there is substantial variation in these opinions (Tables 1 and 2).

Finally, we also include a measure of racial resentment, a dimension of symbolic racism widely used in prior work (Henry and Sears, Reference Henry and Sears2002; Sears Reference Sears, Katz and Taylor1988). In both studies, we measure this as the average response (on five-point agreement scales) to four questions: whether Blacks should overcome prejudice and work their way up without “special favors,” whether slavery and discrimination created conditions that remained significant barriers for lower-class Blacks, whether Blacks had gotten less than they deserved, and whether inequalities would be solved if Blacks tried harder. The second and third questions are reverse-coded such that high values of the measure reflect greater racial resentment: the rejection of structural explanations for racial inequalities, the embrace of individualistic explanations, and a resentment of perceived line-cutting (e.g., Bobo et al., Reference Bobo, Kluegel, Smith, Tuch and Martin1997; Bonilla-Silva Reference Bonilla-Silva2018; Henry and Sears, Reference Henry and Sears2002; Hochschild Reference Hochschild2016).Footnote 8 A value above three in each of the studies reflects an average answer to the questions somewhere between “neither agree nor disagree” and “somewhat agree” for each of the questions—in other words, the average respondent is a little racially resentful of Black Americans (Tables 1 and 2).

Demographic and biographical controls. Our central interest is what mediates the effect of race. Both samples are restricted to non-Hispanic Black and White respondents, and we add a measure to distinguish between the two—roughly fifteen percent of respondents in each identified as Black or African American.Footnote 9 Both studies include a similar set of controls for alternative explanations that may be associated with basic demographic or biographical characteristics, including sex, age, marital status (those who are married or cohabitating and those who are separated, divorced or widowed, with single people as the reference category), years of education, and income (in $1Ks coded from category midpoints).

Methodology

All the outcomes are treated as continuous in linear models. In three of the four cases this is the obvious choice. In both surveys feelings toward the police are rated on a 101-point scale. In the APS, police discrimination is captured from an average of three standardized variables, each having seven or eight categories. In the ATS, police discrimination is captured on a seven-point agreement scale. As such, we also ran all the models treating this outcome as ordinal. The results were substantively identical to models treating the outcome as continuous, and as such the latter models are presented for ease of interpretation relative to the three other outcomes.

The two studies differ in the degree of missing data. As Table 1 illustrates, the APS has very little missing data—no variable was missing more than six cases, and altogether only seventeen cases had any missing data. Given the very small number, we simply drop these cases and present analyses based on the remaining full cases, though replacing the missing values via multiple imputation produced substantively identical results. The ATS involved more missing data across a variety of questions, although even here it was not severe: less than four percent were missing income; age and violent stereotypes were missing less than three percent; and all other variables were under two percent missing. Despite this, we employed a multiple imputation strategy (Allison Reference Allison2002) which does not depend on the assumption that data are missing completely at random, rather that the data are missing at random after controlling for other variables in the analysis. To this end, twenty data sets were imputed in a process that used all the variables from the analyses as well as several auxiliary variables to add information and increase efficiency using the mice package in R (R Core Team, 2019; van Buuren and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Reference van Buuren and Groothuis-Oudshoorn2011). This includes information on employment, stock market investment, and length of time in the neighborhood. Listwise-deleted results were substantively identical to those reported here.

Although the ATS involves two waves, the key questions involving views about the police, police contact, and racial attitudes were all asked only in the second wave, meaning both analyses are effectively cross-sectional. We have reasons to believe our assumptions about temporal ordering are reasonable. The police contact questions refer to past experiences, and prior research suggests in general that abstract political and racial beliefs and affect may be formed earlier and may inform later more specific attitudes (Peffley and Hurwitz, Reference Peffley and Hurwitz1985). However, we do recommend future confirmatory work that can better establish temporal ordering through a longitudinal design or causation through an experimental design.

To explore the meaning of our results and aid in interpretation, we ran a variety of additional exploratory analyses—for instance, interactions considering differences in the effect of police contact by race, or models which step in stereotypes and racial affect before racial resentment. Where relevant we mention these findings in footnotes in the results section, though none of these are critical to our key questions or findings.

Finally, our core question involves mediation. We estimate average mediation effects, bootstrapping 1000 samples (and including all the controls in models predicting the mediators) using the ‘mediation’ package in R (Imai et al., Reference Imai, Keele, Tingley and Yamamoto2011; Tingley et al., Reference Tingley, Yamamoto, Hirose, Keele and Imai2014). Mediation effects are estimates of the indirect effect, and an examination of the confidence intervals is analogous to examining the significance of an indirect effect in a structural equation modeling framework. Based on this analysis, we present figures describing estimates and confidence intervals for the average mediation effects and the proportion mediated (of the total effect—direct effects can be observed in the model).

Results

We are interested in factors that explain views about the police—and in particular that explain racial differences in these views. We investigate these questions in two different surveys, which are presented below in separate sections. Within each, we begin with basic models exploring the relationship of race, police contact, political identification, and racial attitudes with views about the police. Following up on this, we present tests of mediation for factors identified as potentially explaining racial differences in these views.

2016 ANES Pilots Study

APS respondents were randomly assigned to different versions of the criminal justice contact questions—half being asked only about contact in the past twelve months and the other half being asked about contact ever. We present the results here treating each as a separate sample.Footnote 10

Sample with recent contact questions. We begin with the sample of those asked only about criminal justice contact in the last twelve months. Controlling just for basic demographic and biographical characteristics, there are large differences between Black and White respondents, on average, in beliefs about police discrimination and in overall feelings toward the police. Black respondents were on average nearly a standard deviation above White respondents in their belief that the police were more likely mistreat or discriminate against Black relative to White Americans (Table 3, Column 1).Footnote 11 Similarly, the average White respondent rated the police more than eighteen points higher on the 100-point thermometer scale than the average Black respondent (Table 3, Column 4).

Table 3. Coefficients from models predicting views of police from “last 12 months” sample of the APS

* p<.05; ** p<.01; ***p<.001.

Respondents who had recently been stopped were less likely to believe that the police operate with a racial bias against Black Americans (Table 3, column 2).Footnote 12 On the other hand, those who had recently spent a night in jail were less likely to view the police favorably (Table 3, column 5). However, the adjusted r-squares and BICs suggest that contact with the police or criminal justice system add very little to the explanation of views about the police,Footnote 13 nor do they appear to explain much of the direct effect of race—for which the coefficient appears to increase slightly in both models.

Those who identify as conservative were less likely to believe that the police act in biased ways towards Black Americans (Table 3, column 3). Those who possess anti-Black animus—those who rated “Blacks” more coldly than “Whites”—were less likely to believe the police act in discriminatory ways toward Black Americans and were more likely to feel warmly toward the police overall (Table 3 columns 3 and 6). Those who felt racially resentful of Black Americans were substantially less likely to view the police as biased and felt substantially more warmly toward the police overall.Footnote 14 Collectively, these factors add substantially to the overall explanation of views about the police as reflected in the big increases in the adjusted r-squares and the large drops in the BICs. They also appear to explain some of the racial differences in these views: the coefficients for race are much lower in these models, though in both cases still significant.

We explore whether any of these factors explain racial differences more directly by examining average mediation effects and the proportion mediated (see Imai et al., Reference Imai, Keele, Tingley and Yamamoto2011). We do this for any potential mediator outlined in the front end of the paper which appear based on the analysis to be likely candidates for mediation: any of the measures of criminal justice contact and political or racial views that are racially stratified and are significantly associated with the outcome in the appropriate direction.Footnote 15 Figure 1 presents estimates and ninety-five percent confidence intervals (based on 1000 simulations) for the average mediation effect (the indirect effect) as well as the proportion mediated. The mediation (or indirect) effects are presented on the left side and the proportion mediated on the right. Conservative identification has a small and non-significant (the confidence interval crosses zero) average mediation effect on beliefs about police discrimination. In other words, despite the fact that White Americans are more likely to identify as conservative and the fact that those who identify as conservative are less likely to believe in police discrimination, identification as a conservative does not explain why White Americans are less likely to believe in police discrimination. This is the equivalent of finding a non-significant indirect effect in a structural equation modeling approach to testing mediation.Footnote 16 Racial animus has a modest and significant average mediation effect on views of police discrimination, explaining roughly a fifth of the total effect of race. Racial resentment has an even larger and significant average mediation effect, explaining nearly half of the total effect of race on beliefs about police discrimination. For affective support for the police only racial resentment has a significant average mediation effect, explaining about thirty percent of the total effect of race.

Fig. 1. Selected results from tests for mediation from “last 12 months” sample of the APS

Sample with ever contact questions. We turn to the other sample from this survey: those who were asked whether they ever had criminal justice contact. Once again, there are large racial differences, with Black respondents substantially more likely to believe the police act in discriminatory ways—on average more than a standard deviation above White respondents—as well as rating the police substantially lower (about fifteen points) on the thermometer scale (Table 4 columns 1 and 4).

Table 4. Coefficients from models predicting views of police from “ever” sample of the APS

*p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001.

The experience of ever being stopped—in person or vicariously—does not seem to matter to views about the police (Table 4 columns 2 and 5).Footnote 17 Those who have ever spent a night in prison or jail are less likely to feel warmly toward the police, rating them on average ten points lower than those who never had this experience. However, as in the other half of the sample, adding these measures of criminal justice contact does not seem to improve the fit of the model overall much—in fact, BICs increase for both outcomes. Similarly, the inclusion of contact collectively does not appear to explain much of the direct effect of race.

For perceptions of police discrimination, the only political or racial attitude that appears relevant is racial resentment, which does appear strongly related (Table 4 column 3).Footnote 18 The direct effect of race appears diminished in this model, though remains significant.Footnote 19 Respondents identifying as more conservative were more likely to feel fondly toward the police overall, as were those who possessed racial resentment toward Black respondents—both of these effects, however, were modest (Table 4 column 6). Notably, in this final model the direct effect of race has dropped below conventional levels of statistical significance.

As above, we also directly examine whether these factors mediate the effect of race.Footnote 20 Figure 2 presents average mediation (or indirect) effects on the left and the average proportion mediated on the right, each with confidence intervals based on 1000 simulations. As in the other half of the sample, racial resentment appears to be a powerful mediator of racial differences in view of police discrimination, explaining about half of the differences overall. Racial resentment is also estimated to explain about a third of the racial differences in positive feelings toward the police, but neither this—nor any of the other potential mediators—significantly mediate the effect of race (the confidence intervals for each include zero).

Fig. 2. Selected results from tests for mediation from “ever” sample of the APS

2016 ANES Time Series Study

Finally, we repeat these analyses with data from our second survey. Consistent with the first survey, there are large racial differences in views about the police. Black respondents were nearly a standard deviation more likely to believe that police officers treat White Americans better than Black Americans (Table 5, column 1) and rated the police about twenty points more coldly on the 100-point thermometer scale (Table 5, column 4).

Table 5. Coefficients from models predicting views of police from the ATS

*p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001. N=2974.

Those who have ever been arrested were more likely to believe that the police treat Black Americans worse than White Americans (Table 5, column 2).Footnote 21 Both the experience of a recent police stop and an arrest ever decreased affection for the police (table 5, column 5).Footnote 22 For perceptions of police discrimination, adding contact does not appear to improve the fit of the model overall, however these factors do collectively appear to modestly improve the model explaining people’s feelings about the police—from about seventeen to twenty percent of the adjusted variance explained and a small decrease in the BIC. The direct effect of race, however, appears to change very little in these models.

Those who identify as conservative or as Republican were less likely to believe that the police treat Black Americans worse, and conservative respondents rated the police significantly more warmly (Table 5, columns 3 and 6).Footnote 23 Those who believe Black people are generally more violent than White people felt more warmly toward the police overall, as did those respondents who reported feeling less warmly to Black people relative to White people overall.Footnote 24 Those who are racially resentful of Black Americans are less likely to believe that the police are more likely to mistreat Black Americans and more likely to feel warmly toward them overall. Collectively, these factors appear to substantially improve the fit of both models, and in both cases the direct effect of race appears smaller, suggesting these factors may be explaining some of the difference in average views about the police between White and Black Americans.

We also directly explore mediation.Footnote 25 Figure 3 presents estimates and ninety-five percent confidence intervals for average mediation effects (on the left) and the proportion mediated (on the right) for each candidate. Racial differences in political ideologies appear to significantly explain some of the racial differences in view of police discrimination, with conservative identification mediating approximately eight percent of the total effect and Republican identification mediating about seventeen percent. Racial resentment plays an even larger role, explaining more than forty percent of the total racial differences.

Fig. 3. Selected results from tests for mediation from the ATS

For feelings toward the police, a variety of factors appear to play some role. The experience of police stops plays a small role, mediating around four percent of the total effect. Conservative identification mediates around five percent. Neither violent stereotypes about nor a relative coldness toward Black Americans significantly mediates the role of race (the confidence intervals for each include zero). However, once again racial resentment appears to be the most important factor, explaining more than a fifth of the total effect.

Discussion

Summary of Key Findings

Our interest here is in what explains people’s views about the police, and specifically what explains differences in how Black versus White Americans view the police. To answer this question, we employ data from two different national surveys, each including two different dimensions of how people view the police as well as a variety of measures of contact with the police, political and ideological identification, and racial attitudes and feelings. The product of this work is six sets of models and mediation analyses, allowing us to explore factors that are connected to views about the police across the samples, measures, and models. Several important findings emerge.

First, race itself is one of the most striking predictors of views about the police. In each of the surveys, White respondents rated their belief that the police mistreat Black citizens more than White citizens about a standard deviation lower than Black respondents. Similarly, White respondents rated the police, on average, about twenty degrees warmer on the 100-point feelings thermometer than the average Black respondent.

Second, contact with the police was related to views about the police, with the kind of contact that mattered differing across the studies.Footnote 26 The experience of a recent stop made people less likely to believe the police were discriminatory and feel more coldly toward the police in some of the samples. Any kind of experience with arrest or imprisonment made people less likely to feel warmly toward the police overall. However, these experiences with the police did little to explain differences between Black and White respondents in their views about the police (based on the mediation analyses), nor did they add much to the explanation of views about the police overall (based on overall model fit).

Third, political identification was related to views about the police in some of the models. Those who identified as conservative were less likely believe the police to be discriminatory in two of the three models, and Republicans were less likely to believe this in one of the three. Those who identified as conservative were also more likely to feel warmly toward the police in two of the three models.

Fourth, racial affect and violent crime stereotypes were also relevant to views of the police in some of the models. Those who felt more coldly toward ‘Blacks’ versus ‘Whites’ were less likely to believe in police discrimination in one of the three models, and more likely to rate the police warmly in two of the three samples. Stereotypes of Black Americans as violent were associated only with warmer views about the police in one of the three samples. Notably, however, these stereotypes were significantly related to a diminished belief in police bias and more affection for the police in all three samples when the measure of racial resentment is omitted.

Fifth, and finally, one predictor seemed to stand apart in the analyses: racial resentment was associated with a lower likelihood of believing the police to be discriminatory and a generally warmer feelings toward the police in all the samples. Racial resentment also significantly mediated the effect of race in five of the six models, often explaining a substantial portion of the variation: nearly half of the differences in views of police discrimination and twenty to thirty percent of the differences in warmth toward the police.

The seemingly less important roles for racial crime stereotypes and racial animus relative to racial resentment have important implications. As we suggest above, if stereotypes alone were associated with views about the police, it could be the role of stigma, rooted in ignorance. A role for racial affinity alone might also be rooted in the ignorance produced by a lack of contact with Black Americans. Instead, however, it appears that both may serve in part as proxies for racial resentment. This is consistent with the view that prejudicial attitudes and racial animus are the product of and justification for more basic concerns about racial group positions (Blumer Reference Blumer1958; Kendi Reference Kendi2017).

In sum, then, we find, consistent with prior work, large differences, on average, in views of the police between Black and White Americans. We also find that experiences with the police play a role in these views, though not one that does much to explain the racial gap in views of the police—though it may be that specifically negative experiences with the police would explain more of this racial gap. Instead, we identify a racial resentment of Black Americans as a particular important influence on these views overall and a particular important explanation for average racial differences in these views. This racial resentment, consistently higher among White respondents, appeared to explain a substantial portion of the racial differences in views about the police between Black and White respondents. Thus, views about the police are primarily shaped by views of race, specifically views which minimize historical and contemporary discrimination and are rooted in a resentment of perceived efforts to upset the racial status quo.

Conclusion

This work has important implications for a variety of fields and lines of research. Research on how the public views crime and justice issues has often focused on experiential factors such as victimization or encounters with law enforcement, while giving less consideration to the racial politics of these issues (with some notable exceptions, e.g., Callanan and Rosenberger, Reference Callanan and Rosenberger2011; Matsueda and Drakulich, Reference Matsueda and Drakulich2009; Peffley and Hurwitz, Reference Peffley and Hurwitz2010). Yet crime and justice issues have long held important symbolic and political meaning (e.g., Beckett and Sasson, Reference Beckett and Sasson2004; Tonry Reference Tonry2011). This is especially important when crime and justice issues have pressing social and political relevance, as they did for example during the ‘long hot summers’ of the late 1960s, in the aftermath of the Rodney King case in the 1990s, and during the Black Lives Matter movement beginning in the 2010s. Thus, researchers need to understand these views not as clinical evaluations, but as symbolic positions connected to racial and political views.

Second, and relatedly, research should problematize rather than valorize the generally high levels of support for the police among White Americans. A substantial volume of research details racial bias and the disproportionate mistreatment of Black Americans by the police. Until that changes, concerns about police bias and something well short of full support for the police are warranted and appropriate. Failures to acknowledge this bias, and strong expressions of support for the police when this bias in mistreatment persists should be acknowledged as problematic, rather than lauded as the goal. This is especially the case among White Americans, for whom these views are disproportionately rooted in racial animus towards and a resentment of Black Americans.

This has particularly important implications for two specific dimensions of some work on procedural justice and legitimacy. This paper does not test, nor are we challenging any of the key findings of this perspective. Instead, we are raising questions about two aspects present in some of this work: a focus on explaining the on average more negative views about the police among Black Americans rather than the on average more positive views of White Americans, and, relatedly, the assumption that positive views of the police—and the obedience to the police they deliver—should be the goal.

First, the procedural justice literature has often framed the racial gap in views about the police as what Monica C. Bell (Reference Bell2017, p. 2058) describes as a “legitimacy deficit.” In doing so, this work implies that the more negative views of the police among many people of color is the problem to be addressed, while the substantially more positive average views about the police among White Americans are the goal. This is not to say that we should not be concerned with how the police treat people of color. Beyond the obvious violation of a constitutionally mandated equal protection under the law, a voluminous literature described above speaks to the harms caused by the disproportionate mistreatment of Black Americans. Rather, we suggest a shift in the question we ask about this racial gap, one in which concerns about police biases and something short of full-throated support of the police should be the goal for all Americans, at least while the police continue to disproportionately mistreat Black Americans. In short, the question should not be why Black Americans have, on average, more negative views about the police but why White Americans, on average, have such positive views. Critically, this simple shift places greater emphasis on racial and political factors.

This reframing is particularly important given the end goal of police legitimacy and procedural justice work: to convince citizens to obey both the law and the police (e.g., Tyler Reference Tyler2006). As Bell (Reference Bell2017) notes, racial disparities in procedural justice capture an incomplete portrait of the broader problem, in which many Black Americans also experience vicarious marginalization—a consequence of police mistreatment specifically targeting Black Americans—as well as structural exclusion. People can see the police as legitimate, comply with police orders, and still feel estranged from the legal system and the broader society (Bell Reference Bell2017). Procedural justice is hollow when substantive and structural injustices remain intact, and in this light the goal of securing compliance with an unjust system is perverse and problematic.

Bell (Reference Bell2017) suggests a reorientation away from procedural justice and cooperation and towards procedural and structural routes to social inclusion. Our findings support this call by suggesting that those who support the police and view them as unbiased do so when motivated by exclusion—in particular a dislike of and concern about the threat that efforts to better include and elevate Black Americans poses to the social and economic standing of White Americans.

This is important because procedural justice is frequently named as a primary method to achieve racial justice in response to complaints about inequalities and biases. For example, the final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing—commissioned in the wake of mass protests over the shooting detail of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri—made legitimacy “Pillar 1” of its recommendations. Ibram X. Kendi (Reference Kendi2017) distinguishes segregationist, assimilationist, and anti-racist approaches to issues with racial dimensions. Older models of policing that explicitly recommend differential policing for Black Americans are clearly segregationist approaches (e.g., Westley Reference Westley1953; see discussion in Bell Reference Bell2017). In the most generous light, procedural justice may appear to be anti-racist when it focuses on changing the police treatment of Black Americans. But in attempting to affect change in the behavior of Black Americans with the goal of securing respect and cooperation with a system under which they remain unequal and estranged, the perspective may be better understood as assimilationist. In light of our finding that the generally more positive views about the police—including fewer beliefs that the police engage in racial bias—found among White Americans are explained in part by their animus and resentment of Black Americans, setting these views as the goal for Black Americans seems especially problematic. Instead, truly anti-racist approaches would focus on inclusion and explicitly problematize views about the police rooted in exclusionary motivations.

We conclude with a reminder of the stakes. Many Black Americans experience a legal estrangement from the police, the justice system, and society more broadly (e.g., Bell Reference Bell2017). Many Black Americans lack faith and confidence in the police, a consequence of what they know about the disproportionate mistreatment of Black Americans by the police. This matters: the police are public servants tasked with public safety, and yet when the safety of Black Americans is threatened, many do not feel able to call on this public service. Worse still, the police themselves can present a threat to the safety of Black Americans. When the police become symbolic tools for racist political discourse (e.g., Drakulich et al., Reference Drakulich, Wozniak, Hagan and Johnson2020), and when the police are used to confront and suppress protests about police racial bias, Black Americans experience more estrangement. When, in the midst of calls to recognize this police bias, many White Americans deny the bias and express support for the police—and do so out of an animus toward Black Americans and a desire to preserve racial inequalities—Black Americans experience even more estrangement and marginalization.

Supplementary Materials

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X22000133.

Footnotes

1 Notably, work on procedural justice often avoids explicit references to racial differences in views about the police, using non-racial terms like ‘neutrality’ rather than discrimination or bias (though see Schulhofer et al., Reference Schulhofer, Tyler and Huq2011; Tyler and Wakslak, Reference Tyler and Wakslak2004).

2 In fact, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court—in Commonwealth v. Warren 475 Mass. 530 (2016)—suggested that fleeing from the police does not necessarily reflect a desire to hide criminal activity, but, acknowledging racially disproportionate police stops, may “just as easily be motivated by the desire to avoid the recurring indignity of being racially profiled.”

3 Throughout much of the history of policing, which grew in part out of organized slave patrols (Hadden Reference Hadden2003), the expectation that ‘dangerous classes’—including Black Americans—should be policed differently was made relatively explicit (e.g., Westley Reference Westley1953, see discussion in Bell Reference Bell2017). Similar practices—disguised in less explicitly racial language—persist (e.g., Moskos Reference Moskos2008).

4 W. E. B. Du Bois (Reference Du Bois1899) suggests White Americans take objection to an ‘ignorance’ among Black Americans that they in fact bear a responsibility for through slavery and discrimination. Similarly, Gunnar Myrdal (Reference Myrdal1944) suggests that White Americans use the poor performance of Black Americans as a justification for their differential treatment, even though the poor performance is in fact the result of this differential treatment. As Ibram X. Kendi (Reference Kendi2017) notes, racist ideas are the product of racial discrimination, rather than vice-versa.

5 The sample was selected from the YouGov panel by sample matching, using prior estimates of the U.S. population along the lines of gender, age, race, education, voter registration and turnout status, as well as politics and party identification. Additional information can be found at http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm

6 Analyses using the full data and including controls for respondents of other races and ethnicities produce identical results for Black and White respondents by design. We chose to focus just on differences between Black and White respondents rather than report results for other racial and ethnic groups that we did not have the space to properly set up or discuss. See numerous examples of work on other groups in Jennifer H. Peck’s (Reference Peck2015) review.

7 Factor scores from a confirmatory factor analysis of the three measures produced substantively identical results. The three items have an alpha reliability of .86.

8 Prior work suggests these views are primarily driven by social concerns about relative racial group positions (Simmons and Bobo, Reference Simmons and Bobo2018), are connected to both explicit and implicit indicators of racial animus (Drakulich Reference Drakulich2015a; Sears et al., Reference Sears, Van Laar, Carrillo and Kosterman1997), and are independent from a more general political conservatism or non-racial individualism (Enders Reference Enders2019; Kinder and Mendelberg, Reference Kinder, Mendelberg, Sears, Sidanius and Bobo2000; Tarman and Sears, Reference Tarman and Sears2005; Wallsten et al., Reference Wallsten, Nteta, McCarthy and Tarsi2017)—though we also include a separate measure of conservative ideology to distinguish these views. Cindy D. Kam and Camille D. Burge (Reference Kam and Burge2018) show that the scale usefully distinguishes preferences for structural versus individual attributions among both White and Black Americans. Although we employ the term ‘racial resentment’ for consistency with past work, we utilize more specific descriptions of the meaning of the measure in recognition of the idea that labels matter (see Kam and Burge, Reference Kam and Burge2018).

9 In exploring the connection between race and views about the police, we assume race is socially constructed and includes a ‘bundle’ of differing characteristics (Sen and Wasow, Reference Sen and Wasow2016). Consistent with this, the results suggest substantial intra-racial variation. We view race as a social construction and a ‘bundle’.

10 We also ran models using the full sample in which all the terms are interacted with an indicator of the contact reference time-period (which produces equivalent results by design). Given our interest in contrasting the effect of police contact versus politics and racial attitudes—rather than the contrast between recent and older contact—we chose to present the two separately.

11 The outcome is the average of standardized scores, so an increase of one unit is an increase of an average of one standard deviation across the three items comprising it.

12 An exploratory interaction suggested the effect was not identifiably different for White and Black respondents.

13 For both outcomes, the change in adjusted R2 and BIC is small, for warmth towards police, the BIC actually increases.

14 Notably, when racial resentment is omitted from the model, those identifying as Republican and those who believe Black people are more violent are significantly less likely to believe the police are biased and feel more warmly toward the police. This is not the consequence of multicollinearity, so it appears that those factors may have been acting as proxies for racial resentment.

15 There are no racial differences in the experience of having spent a night in jail or prison in the past year (a rare event overall). Black respondents were more likely to report having been stopped in the last year, but police stops were negatively associated with views of police discrimination, meaning it could not explain higher beliefs in discrimination among Black respondents—instead, there appears to be evidence of a small suppressor effect. Notably, alternative approaches to selecting mediators for consideration—either formally testing all potential mediators regardless of their empirical relationship with race or the outcomes or focusing on a smaller set of mediators like the measures of racial attitudes—do not change the main substantive finding about the seeming predominance of racial resentment as a predictor and mediator.

16 In fact, an SEM approach to these mediations produces substantively identical results.

17 Exploratory interactions suggested the experience of a family member being stopped does increase perceptions of police bias, but only among Black respondents.

18 As with the other half of this sample, dropping racial resentment reveals significant effects in the expected direction for politics, stereotypes, and racial affect, suggesting these may simply be serving as proxies for deeper concerns about racial group positions.

19 Controlling for politics and racial attitudes appears to have a small suppression effect on the role of being stopped.

20 The experience of having ever been stopped by the police is not associated with race, and thus is not considered as a possible mediator.

21 Exploratory interactions revealed no differences in this effect by race.

22 Interestingly, exploratory interactions suggested stops mattered more for Black respondents while arrests mattered more for White respondents.

23 Notably, in each of the data sets, stepping in politics and racial attitudes before experiences with the justice system does not change the substantive story.

24 As in the other sample, these factors were also both relevant to perceptions of police discrimination before racial resentment is included.

25 Black respondents were less likely to report ever being arrested, making it an inappropriate candidate for mediation given the direction of the relationship of race and arrests to the two views of police.

26 Notably, our measures do not capture the quality of these experiences, which may play a greater role than the simple presence of contact captured here. This is unlikely to affect our estimates of the effect of racism, given the lack of an expected direct relationship between experiences with the police and racism. We are also not claiming that experiences with the police or justice system are not relevant at all—in fact, better accounting for explicitly negative experiences with the police may explain more of the remaining racial differences in views of the police. Instead, our key finding is simply that racial attitudes appear to matter in important ways even after controlling for different experiences with the police. The Appendix explores some of these issues and gives us greater confidence in our interpretation of the findings, but we recommend further work comparing the role of racial attitudes to measures of negative experiences with the police and the racial context.

References

Alcindor, Yamiche (2016). Trump, Rallying White Crowd for Police, Accuses Democrats of Exploiting Blacks. The New York Times, August 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/17/us/politics/donald-trump-rally-is-called-chance-to-show-support-for-police.html (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Alexander, Michelle (2020). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Paul (2002). Missing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, Gordon W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
American National Election Studies (2016). The ANES 2016 Pilot Study [ ]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers].Google Scholar
American National Election Studies (2017). The ANES 2016 Time Series Study [ ]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan [producers].Google Scholar
Anderson, Elijah (1999). Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City (1st edition). New York: W W Norton & Co Inc.Google Scholar
Baptist, Edward E. (2016). The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baranauskas, Andrew J., and Drakulich, Kevin M. (2018). Media Construction of Crime Revisited: Media Types, Consumer Contexts, and Frames of Crime and Justice. Criminology, 56(4): 679714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Steven E., and Cohn, Steven F. (1998). Racial Prejudice and Support by Whites for Police Use of Force: A Research Note. Justice Quarterly, 15(4); 743753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Epp, Derek A., and Shoub, Kelsey (2018). Suspect Citizens: What 20 Million Traffic Stops Tell Us About Policing and Race. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, Katherine, Nyrop, Kris, and Pfingst, Lori (2006). Race, Drugs, and Policing: Understanding Disparities in Drug Delivery Arrests. Criminology, 44(1): 105137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, Katherine, and Sasson, Theodore (2004). The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Monica C. (2017). Police Reform and the Dismantling of Legal Estrangement. The Yale Law Journal, 126: 20542150.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas (1990). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Black Lives Matter (n.d.). What We Believe. Black Lives Matter. https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ Google Scholar
Blackmon, Douglas A. (2009). Slavery By Another Name: The Re-enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II (1st Anchor Books ed). New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1958). Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1): 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Johnson, Devon (2004). A Taste for Punishment: Black and White Americans’ Views on the Death Penalty and the War on Drugs. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 1(1): 151180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, Kluegel, James R., and Smith, Ryan A. (1997). Laissez-Faire Racism: The Crystallization of a Kinder, Gentler, Antiblack Ideology. In Tuch, Steven A. and Martin, Jack K. (Eds.), Racial Attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and Change (pp. 1541). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Smith, Ryan A. (1998). From Jim Crow Racism to Laissez-Faire Racism: The Transformation of Racial Attitudes. In Katkin, Wendy F., Landsman, Ned, and Tyree, Andrea (Eds.), Beyond Pluralism: The Conception of Groups and Group Identities in America (pp. 182220). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo (2018). Racism Without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America (Fifth edition). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bouie, Jamelle (2015). What Clinton’s Criminal Justice Speech Reveals About Her 2016 Campaign. Slate Magazine, April 30. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/04/hillary-clintons-impressive-criminal-justice-speech-the-democratic-front-runner-is-making-mass-incarceration-and-policing-a-democratic-campaign-issue.html (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Boyles, Andrea S. (2019). You Can’t Stop the Revolution: Community Disorder and Social Ties in Post-Ferguson America. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., Brunson, Rod K., and Drakulich, Kevin M. (2019). Race, Place, and Effective Policing. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1): 535555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunson, Rod K. (2007). “Police Don’t Like Black People”: African-American Young Men’s Accumulated Police Experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1): 71101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunson, Rod K., and Weitzer, Ronald (2009). Police Relations with Black and White Youths in Different Urban Neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 44(6): 858885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callanan, Valerie J., and Rosenberger, Jared S. (2011). Media and Public Perceptions of the Police: Examining the Impact of Race and Personal Experience. Policing and Society, 21(2): 167189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Colin (2015). Donald Trump Blasts Black Lives Matter. Business Insider, September 9. https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-black-lives-matter-2015-9 (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Cao, Liqun, Stack, Steven, and Sun, Yi (1998). Public Attitudes Toward the Police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26(4): 279289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. Scott, and Corra, Mamadi (2016). Racial Resentment and Attitudes Toward the Use of Force by Police: An Over-Time Trend Analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 86(4): 492511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. Scott, Corra, Mamadi, and Jenks, David A. (2016). In the Shadows of Ferguson: The Role of Racial Resentment on White Attitudes Towards the Use of Force by Police in the United States. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 11(2): 18.Google Scholar
Chermak, Steven, and Weiss, Alexander (2005). Maintaining Legitimacy Using External Communication Strategies: An Analysis of Police-Media Relations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(5): 501512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiricos, Ted, Welch, Kelly, and Gertz, Marc (2004). Racial Typification of Crime and Support for Punitive Measures. Criminology, 42(2): 358390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobbina, Jennifer (2019). Hands Up, Don’t Shoot: Why the Protests in Ferguson and Baltimore Matter, and How They Changed America. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Correll, Joshua, Park, Bernadette, Judd, Charles M., Wittenbrink, Bernd, Sadler, Melody S., and Keesee, Tracie (2007). Across the Thin Blue Line: Police Officers and Racial Bias in the Decision to Shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6): 10061023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyle, Michael (2002). Race and Class Penalties in Crack Cocaine Sentencing. The Sentencing Project. https://static.prisonpolicy.org/scans/sp/RaceandClass.Sentencing.pdf (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Crutchfield, Robert D., Skinner, Martie L., Haggerty, Kevin P., McGlynn, Anne, and Catalano, Richard F. (2012). Racial Disparity in Police Contacts. Race and Justice, 2(3): 179202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, David (2013). Klansville, U.S.A: The Rise and Fall of the Civil Rights Era Ku Klux Klan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeBell, Matthew, Amsbary, Michelle, Meldener, Vanessa, Brock, Shelley, and Maisel, Natalya (2018). Methodology Report for the ANES 2016 Time Series Study. https://electionstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/anes_timeseries_2016_methodology_report.pdf (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Dowler, Kenneth, and Sparks, Raymond (2008). Victimization, Contact with Police, and Neighborhood Conditions: Reconsidering African American and Hispanic Attitudes Toward the Police. Police Practice and Research, 9(5): 395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin (2012). Strangers, Neighbors, and Race: A Contact Model of Stereotypes and Racial Anxieties About Crime. Race and Justice, 2(4): 322355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin (2013). Perceptions of the Local Danger Posed by Crime: Race, Disorder, Iinformal Control, and the Police. Social Science Research, 42(3): 611632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drakulich, Kevin (2015a). Explicit and Hidden Racial Bias in the Framing of Social Problems. Social Problems, 62(3): 391418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin (2015b). The Hidden Role of Racial Bias in Support for Policies Related to Inequality and Crime. Punishment & Society, 17(5): 541574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin, and Crutchfield, Robert D. (2013). The Role of Perceptions of the Police in Informal Social Control: Implications for the Racial Stratification of Crime and Control. Social Problems, 60(3): 383407.Google Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin, Hagan, John, Johnson, Devon, and Wozniak, Kevin H. (2017). Race, Justice, Policing, and the 2016 American Presidential Election. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 14(1), 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin, and Siller, Laura (2015). Presumed Danger: Race, Bias, Stigma, and Perceptions of Crime and Criminals. In Johnson, Devon, Warren, Patricia Y., and Farrell, Amy (Eds.), Deadly Injustice: Race, Criminal Justice, and the Death of Trayvon Martin (pp. 2358). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin, Wozniak, Kevin H., Hagan, John, and Johnson, Devon (2020). Race and Policing in the 2016 Presidential Election: Black Lives Matter, the Police, and Dog Whistle Politics. Criminology, 58(2): 370402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drakulich, Kevin, Wozniak, Kevin H., Hagan, John, and Johnson, Devon (2021). Whose Lives Mattered?: How White and Black Americans Felt about Black Lives Matter in 2016. Law & Society Review, 55(2): 227251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1899). The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study. Philadelphia, PA: Publications of the University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ekins, Emily (2016). Policing in America: Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Police. Washington, DC: CATO Institute.Google Scholar
Enders, Adam M. (2019). A Matter of Principle?: On the Relationship Between Racial Resentment and Ideology. Political Behavior, 43(2): 561584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enns, Peter K., and Jardina, Ashley (2021). Complicating the Role of White Racial Attitudes and Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(2): 539570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, Richard V. (1989). Patrolling the Facts: Secrecy and Publicity in Police Work. The British Journal of Sociology, 40(2): 205226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Adam D., Rowan, Zachary, and Simmons, Cortney (2019). Do Politics Trump Race in Determining America’s Youths’ Perceptions of Law Enforcement? Journal of Criminal Justice, 61: 4857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flexon, Jamie L., Lurigio, Arthur J., and Greenleaf, Richard G. (2009). Exploring the Dimensions of Trust in the Police Among Chicago Juveniles. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(2): 180189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbidon, Shaun L., Penn, Everette B., Jordan, Kareem L., and Higgins, George E. (2009). The Influence of Race/Ethnicity on the Perceived Prevalence and Support for Racial Profiling at Airports. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(3): 344358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. (1988). A Constructionist Approach to Mass Media and Public Opinion. Symbolic Interaction, 11(2): 161174.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andre (1989). Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1): 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garza, Alicia (2016). A Herstory of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement. In Hobson, Janell (Ed.), Are All the Women Still White?: Rethinking Race, Expanding Feminisms (pp. 2328). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gately, Gary, and Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (2015). Baltimore Police Assailed for Response After Freddie Gray’s Death. The New York Times, November 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/us/baltimore-police-assailed-for-response-after-freddie-grays-death.html (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Gau, Jacinta M., and Brunson, Rod K. (2010). Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2): 255279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Fagan, Jeffrey, and Kiss, Alex (2007). An Analysis of the New York City Police Department’s “Stop-and-Frisk” Policy in the Context of Claims of Racial Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(479): 813823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanton, Dahleen (2016). Hillary Clinton Isn’t Afraid to Say Black Lives Matter. Chicago Tribune, July 27. https://www.chicagotribune.com/columns/ct-clinton-black-lives-matter-glanton-20160727-column.html (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grawert, Ames (2016). The Overlooked Promise in Hillary Clinton’s Speech. The Marshall Project, July 31. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2016/07/31/the-overlooked-promise-in-hillary-clinton-s-speech (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Hadden, Sally E. (2003). Slave Patrols: Law and Violence in Virginia and the Carolinas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, John, and Albonetti, Celesta (1982). Race, Class, and the Perception of Criminal Injustice in America. American Journal of Sociology, 88(2): 329355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, John, Shedd, Carla, and Payne, Monique R. (2005). Race, Ethnicity, and Youth Perceptions of Criminal Injustice. American Sociological Review, 70(3): 381407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney-López, Ian (2014). Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Healy, Patrick, and Burns, Alexander (2016). First Clinton-Trump Debate Is Framed by Rifts Over Race and Gender. The New York Times, September 25. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/26/us/politics/clinton-trump-issues.html (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Henry, P. J., and Sears, David O. (2002). The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale. Political Psychology, 23(2): 253283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell (2016). Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei (2011). Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4): 765789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Mary R., and Muha, Michael J. (1984). Education and Intergroup Attitudes: Moral Enlightenment, Superficial Democratic Commitment, or Ideological Refinement? American Sociological Review, 49(6): 751769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Jonathan, and Bradford, Ben (2009). Crime, Policing and Social Order: On the Expressive Nature of Public Confidence in Policing: Crime, Policing and Social Order. The British Journal of Sociology , 60(3): 493521.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackson, Jonathan, and Sunshine, Jason (2007). Public Confidence in Policing. The British Journal of Criminology, 47(2): 214233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Devon (2008). Racial Prejudice, Perceived Injustice, and the Black-White Gap in Punitive Attitudes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 198206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Devon, Brazier, Daniel, Forrest, Katrina, Ketelhut, Crispin, Mason, Darron, and Mitchell, Marc (2011). Attitudes Toward the Use of Racial/Ethnic Profiling to Prevent Crime and Terrorism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(4): 422447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Devon, and Kuhns, Joseph B. (2009). Striking Out: Race and Support for Police Use of Force. Justice Quarterly, 26(3): 592623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Devon, Wilson, David B., Maguire, Edward R., and Lowrey-Kinberg, Belén V. (2017). Race and Perceptions of Police: Experimental Results on the Impact of Procedural (In)Justice. Justice Quarterly, 34(7): 11841212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kimberly Barsamian, Thompson, Melissa, and McMahon, Jean M. (2017). Privileged Protection?: Effects of Suspect Race and Mental Illness Status on Public Perceptions of Police Use of Force. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(2): 171191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Cindy D., and Burge, Camille D. (2018). Uncovering Reactions to the Racial Resentment Scale Across the Racial Divide. The Journal of Politics, 80(1): 314320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasinsky, Renée Goldsmith (1995). Patrolling the Facts: Media, Cops, and Crime. In Media, Process, and the Social Construction of Crime: Studies in Newsmaking Criminology (pp. 203236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendi, Ibram X. (2017). Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Mendelberg, Tali (2000). Individualism Reconsidered. In Sears, David O., Sidanius, Jim, and Bobo, Lawrence (Eds.), Racialized Politics (pp. 4474). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, David S., and Papachristos, Andrew V. (2011). Cultural Mechanisms and the Persistence of Neighborhood Violence. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4): 11901233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, Clifford (1994). Poll Finds a Lack of Faith in Police. The New York Times, June 19. https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/19/us/poll-finds-a-lack-of-faith-in-police.html (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Piston, Spencer (2015). Racial Prejudice, Partisanship, and White Turnout in Elections with Black Candidates. Political Behavior, 37(2): 397418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krysan, Maria, and Moberg, Sarah (2016). Trends in Racial Attitudes. University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public Affairs. http://igpa.uillinois.edu/programs/racial-attitudes (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Law Enforcement Action Partnership (2017). Police-Community Relations. Law Enforcement Action Partnership. https://lawenforcementactionpartnership.org/our-issues/police-community-relations/ (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. (2012). Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, Amy E., and Weaver, Vesla M. (2014). Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana (2018). Losing Common Ground: Social Sorting and Polarization. The Forum, 16(1): 4766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsueda, Ross L., and Drakulich, Kevin (2009). Perceptions of Criminal Injustice, Symbolic Racism, and Racial Politics. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 623(1): 163178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsueda, Ross L., Drakulich, Kevin M., Hagan, John, Krivo, Laurie J., and Peterson, Ruth D. (2011). Crime, Perceptions of Criminal Injustice, and Electoral Politics. In Aldrich, John and McGraw, Kathleen M. (Eds.), Improving Public Opinion Surveys: Interdisciplinary Innovation and the American National Election Studies (pp. 323341). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mazerolle, Lorraine, Bennett, Sarah, Davis, Jacqueline, Sargeant, Elise, and Manning, Matthew (2013). Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3): 245274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLemore, Brie (2019). Procedural Justice, Legal Estrangement, and the Black People’s Grand Jury. Virginia Law Review, 105(2): 371396.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Rory (2009). The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-wing Movements and National Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, Christi, and Pickett, Justin T. (2022). Public Fear of Protesters and Support for Protest Policing: An Experimental Test of Two Theoretical Models. Criminology, 60(1): 6089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. C., and LeCount, Ryan Jerome (2020). The Value of Social Control: Racial Resentment, Punitiveness, and White Support for Spending on Law Enforcement. Sociological Perspectives, 63(5): 697718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskos, Peter (2008). Cop in the Hood: My Year Policing Baltimore’s Eastern District. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Muhammad, Khalil Gibran (2010). The Condemnation of Blackness: Race, Crime, and the Making of Modern Urban America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murayama, Kou, Pekrun, Reinhard, and Fielder, Klaus (2014). Research Practices That Can Prevent an Inflation of False-Positive Rates. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2) 107118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myrdal, Gunnar (1944). An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Nelson, Shannon C. (2008). Feeling Thermometer. In Lavrakas, Paul J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods (p. 276). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Research Methods.Google Scholar
Nix, Justin, Campbell, Bradley A., Byers, Edward H., and Alpert, Geoffrey P. (2017). A Bird’s Eye View of Civilians Killed by Police in 2015: Further Evidence of Implicit Bias. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1): 309340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, Peter B., McVeigh, Rory, and Cunningham, David (2019). Race, Ethnicity, and Social Movements. In Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., Kriesi, Hanspeter, and McCammon, Holly J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (2nd ed., pp. 553570). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Parker, Ashley (2016). In “Good Old Days,” Donald Trump Says, Campaign Protesters Got More Than Just an Escort Out. The New York Times, February 27. https://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/27/in-good-old-days-donald-trump-says-campaign-protesters-got-more-than-just-an-escort-out/ (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Peck, Jennifer H. (2015). Minority Perceptions of the Police: A State-of-the-art Review. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(1): 173203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark A., and Hurwitz, Jon (1985). A Hierarchical Model of Attitude Constraint. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4): 871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark, and Hurwitz, Jon (2010). Justice in America: The Separate Realities of Blacks and Whites. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, Kyle, Sierra-Arévalo, Michael, and Rand, David G. (2019). A Field Experiment on Community Policing and Police Legitimacy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(40): 1989419898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, Justin T. (2016). On the Social Foundations for Crimmigration: Latino Threat and Support for Expanded Police Powers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(1): 103132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T., Chiricos, Ted, Golden, Kristin M., and Gertz, Marc (2012). Reconsidering the Relationship Between Perceived Neighborhood Racial Composition and Whites’ Perceptions of Victimization Risk: Do Racial Stereotypes Matter? Criminology, 50(1): 145186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, Justin T., Nix, Justin, and Roche, Sean Patrick (2018). Testing a Social Schematic Model of Police Procedural Justice. Social Psychology Quarterly, 81(2): 97125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015). Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (p. 116). Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Quillian, Lincoln, and Pager, Devah (2001). Black Neighbors, Higher Crime?: The Role of Racial Stereotypes in Evaluations of Neighborhood Crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3): 717767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rafter, Nicole Hahn (1990). The Social Construction of Crime and Crime Control. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(4): 376389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, Sean Patrick, Pickett, Justin T., and Gertz, Marc (2016). The Scary World of Online News?: Internet News Exposure and Public Attitudes Toward Crime and Justice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2): 215236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Cody T. (2015). A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011–2014. PLOS ONE, 10(11).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothstein, Richard (2017). The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America (First edition). New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Russell-Brown, Katheryn (1998). The Color of Crime: Racial Hoaxes, White Fear, Black Protectionism, Police Harassment, and Other Macroaggressions. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. (2009). Disparity and Diversity in the Contemporary City: Social (Dis)order Revisited: Disparity and Diversity in the Contemporary City. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(1): 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulhofer, Stephen J., Tyler, Tom R., and Huq, Aziz Z. (2011). American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and The Procedural Justice Alternative. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101(2): 335374.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, Steeh, Charlotte, and Bobo, Lawrence (1985). Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. (1988). Symbolic Racism. In Katz, Phyllis A. and Taylor, Dalmas A. (Eds.), Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy (pp. 5384). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Van Laar, Colette, Carrillo, Mary, and Kosterman, Rick (1997). Is It Really Racism?: The Origins of White Americans’ Opposition to Race-Targeted Policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61: 1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., and McConahay, John B. (1973). The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Blacks and the Watts Riot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sen, Maya, and Wasow, Omar (2016). Race as a Bundle of Sticks: Designs that Estimate Effects of Seemingly Immutable Characteristics. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1): 499522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn (2018). Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Jasmine R., and Pickett, Justin T. (2015). Toward a Better Understanding of Politicized Policing Attitudes: Conflicted Conservatism and Support for Police Use of Force. Criminology, 53(4): 650676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Alicia D., and Bobo, Lawrence (2018). Understanding “No Special Favors”: A Quantitative and Qualitative Mapping of the Meaning of Responses to the Racial Resentment Scale. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 15(02): 323352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, Wesley G. (2006). Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters with Police. Policing and Society, 16(2): 99126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1): 197217.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke, Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4): 464481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickler, Ryan, and Lawson, Edward (2020). Racial Conservatism, Self-monitoring, and Perceptions of Police Violence. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 10(2): 254275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, and Tyler, Tom R. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3): 513548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarman, Christopher, and Sears, David O. (2005). The Conceptualization and Measurement of Symbolic Racism. The Journal of Politics, 67(3): 731761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta (2016). From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta (2019). Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, David J. (2016). Law Enforcement Must Regain the Public’s Trust. National Police Foundation, October 27. https://www.policefoundation.org/law-enforcement-must-regain-the-publics-trust/ (accessed March 22, 2022).Google Scholar
Thorsen, Leah, and Giegerich, Steve (2014). Shooting of Teen by Ferguson Officer Spurs Angry Backlash. St. Louis Post - Dispatch, August 10, A1.Google Scholar
Tillery, Alvin B. (2019). What Kind of Movement is Black Lives Matter?: The View from Twitter. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 4(2): 297323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingley, Dustin, Yamamoto, Teppei, Hirose, Kentaro, Keele, Luke, and Imai, Kosuke (2014). Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael H. (2011). Punishing Race: A Continuing American Dilemma. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tope, Daniel, Pickett, Justin T., and Chiricos, Ted (2015). Anti-minority Attitudes and Tea Party Movement Membership. Social Science Research, 51: 322337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R. (2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic Group Differences in Trust and Confidence in the Police. Police Quarterly, 8(3): 322342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2017). Procedural Justice and Policing: A Rush to Judgment? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1): 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Fagan, Jeffrey (2008). Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities Symposium - Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1): 231276.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Huo, Yuen J. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Jackson, Jonathan (2014). Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation, and Engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1): 7895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., and Wakslak, Cheryl J. (2004). Profiling and Police Legitimacy: Procedural Justice, Attributions of Motive, and Acceptance of Police Authority. Criminology, 42(2): 253282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnever, James D., and Cullen, Francis T. (2010). Racial-Ethnic Intolerance and Support for Capital Punishment: A Cross-National Comparison. Criminology, 48(3): 831864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Updegrove, Alexander H., Cooper, Maisha N., Orrick, Erin A., and Piquero, Alex R. (2020). Red States and Black Lives: Applying the Racial Threat Hypothesis to the Black Lives Matter Movement. Justice Quarterly, 37(1): 85108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Buuren, Stef, and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin (2011). Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3).Google Scholar
Voigt, Rob, Camp, Nicholas P., Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar, Hamilton, William L., Hetey, Rebecca C., Griffiths, Camilla M., Jurgens, David, Jurafsky, Dan, and Eberhardt, Jennifer L. (2017). Language from Police Body Camera Footage Shows Racial Disparities in Officer Respect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(25): 65216526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wacquant, Loïc (2003). America’s New ‘Peculiar Institution’: On the Prison as Surrogate Ghetto. In Blomberg, T. G. and Cohen, S. (Eds.), Punishment and Social Control (2nd ed., pp. 471482). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wallsten, Kevin, Nteta, Tatishe M., McCarthy, Lauren A., and Tarsi, Melinda R. (2017). Prejudice or Principled Conservatism?: Racial Resentment and White Opinion toward Paying College Athletes. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1): 209222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Patricia Y. (2011). Perceptions of Police Disrespect During Vehicle Stops: A Race-Based Analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 57(3): 356376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald (2000). Racialized Policing: Residents’ Perceptions in Three Neighborhoods. Law & Society Review, 34(1): 129155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald, and Tuch, Steven A. (2006). Race and Policing in America: Conflict and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald, and Tuch, Steven A. (2002). Perceptions of Racial Profiling: Race, Class, and Personal Experience. Criminology, 40(2): 435456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald, and Tuch, Steven A. (2004). Race and Perceptions of Police Misconduct. Social Problems, 51(3): 305325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald, and Tuch, Steven A. (2005). Racially Biased Policing: Determinants of Citizen Perceptions. Social Forces, 83(3): 10091030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westley, William A. (1953). Violence and the Police. American Journal of Sociology, 59(1): 3441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortley, Scot, Hagan, John, and Macmillan, Ross (1997). Just Des(s)erts?: The Racial Polarization of Perceptions of Criminal Injustice. Law & Society Review, 31(4): 637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wozniak, Kevin H. (2016). Ontological Insecurity, Racial Tension, and Confidence in the Police in the Shadow of Urban Unrest. Sociological Forum, 31(4): 10631082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wozniak, Kevin H., Drakulich, Kevin M., and Calfano, Brian R. (2020). Do Photos of Police-Civilian Interactions Influence Public Opinion about the Police?: A Multimethod Test of Media Effects. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17: 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yuning, Sun, Ivan Y., and Triplett, Ruth A. (2009). Race, Class or Neighborhood Context: Which Matters More in Measuring Satisfaction with Police? Justice Quarterly, 26(1): 125156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Vernetta (2006). Demythologizing the “Criminalblackman”. In Peterson, Ruth D., Krivo, Laurie J., and Hagan, John (Eds.), The Many Colors of Crime (pp. 5466). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Zamble, Edward, and Annesley, Phyllis (1987). Some Determinants of Public Attitudes Toward the Police. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 15(4): 285290.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for APS

Figure 1

Table 2. Descriptive statistics for ATS

Figure 2

Table 3. Coefficients from models predicting views of police from “last 12 months” sample of the APS

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Selected results from tests for mediation from “last 12 months” sample of the APS

Figure 4

Table 4. Coefficients from models predicting views of police from “ever” sample of the APS

Figure 5

Fig. 2. Selected results from tests for mediation from “ever” sample of the APS

Figure 6

Table 5. Coefficients from models predicting views of police from the ATS

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Selected results from tests for mediation from the ATS

Supplementary material: File

Drakulich et al. supplementary material

Drakulich et al. supplementary material
Download Drakulich et al. supplementary material(File)
File 34.9 KB