q-opers, QQ-systems, and Bethe Ansatz II: Generalized minors

References

[1] M. Aganagic, E. Frenkel and A. Okounkov, Quantum q-Langlands correspondence, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 79 (2018), 1–83. 10.1090/mosc/278Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. Baranovsky and V. Ginzburg, Conjugacy classes in loop groups and G-bundles on elliptic curves, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 1996 (1996), no. 15, 733–751. 10.1155/S1073792896000463Search in Google Scholar

[3] V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrable structure of conformal field theory, quantum KdV theory and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, Comm. Math. Phys. 177 (1996), no. 2, 381–398. 10.1007/BF02101898Search in Google Scholar

[4] V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrable structure of conformal field theory. II. Q -operator and DDV equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 190 (1997), no. 2, 247–278. 10.1007/s002200050240Search in Google Scholar

[5] V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Integrable structure of conformal field theory. III. The Yang–Baxter relation, Comm. Math. Phys. 200 (1999), no. 2, 297–324. 10.1007/s002200050531Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld, Opers, preprint (2005), https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0501398. Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Berenstein, S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky, Cluster algebras. III. Upper bounds and double Bruhat cells, Duke Math. J. 126 (2005), no. 1, 1–52. 10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12611-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Berenstein and A. Zelevinsky, Total positivity in Schubert varieties, Comment. Math. Helv. 72 (1997), no. 1, 128–166. 10.1007/PL00000363Search in Google Scholar

[9] T. J. Brinson, D. S. Sage and A. M. Zeitlin, Opers on the projective line, Wronskian Relations, and the Bethe ansatz, preprint (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02711. Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Bullimore, H.-C. Kim and P. Koroteev, Defects and quantum Seiberg–Witten geometry, J. High Energy Phys. (2015), no. 5, Paper No. 95. 10.1007/JHEP05(2015)095Search in Google Scholar

[11] N. Chriss and V. Ginzburg, Representation theory and complex geometry, Birkhäuser, Boston 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[12] P. Dorey, C. Dunning and R. Tateo, The ODE/IM correspondence, J. Phys. A 40 (2007), no. 32, R205–R283. 10.1142/9789812799739_0004Search in Google Scholar

[13] V. G. Drinfel’d and V. V. Sokolov, Lie algebras and equations of Korteweg–de Vries type, J. Sov. Math. 30 (1985), no. 2, 1975–2036. 10.1142/9789812798244_0002Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. Ekhammar, H. Shu and D. Volin, Extended systems of Baxter Q-functions and fused flags I: Simply-laced case, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.10597. Search in Google Scholar

[15] B. Feigin and E. Frenkel, Quantization of soliton systems and Langlands duality, Exploring new structures and natural constructions in mathematical physics, Adv. Stud. Pure Math. 61, Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo (2011), 185–274. 10.2969/aspm/06110185Search in Google Scholar

[16] B. Feigin, E. Frenkel and N. Reshetikhin, Gaudin model, Bethe ansatz and critical level, Comm. Math. Phys. 166 (1994), no. 1, 27–62. 10.1007/BF02099300Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky, Double Bruhat cells and total positivity, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999), no. 2, 335–380. 10.1090/S0894-0347-99-00295-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky, Recognizing Schubert cells, J. Algebraic Combin. 12 (2000), no. 1, 37–57. 10.1023/A:1008759501188Search in Google Scholar

[19] E. Frenkel, Opers on the projective line, flag manifolds and Bethe ansatz, Mosc. Math. J. 4 (2004), no. 3, 655–705. 10.17323/1609-4514-2004-4-3-655-705Search in Google Scholar

[20] E. Frenkel, Langlands correspondence for loop groups, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 103, Cambridge University, Cambridge 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[21] E. Frenkel, Gaudin model and opers, Infinite dimensional algebras and quantum integrable systems, Progr. Math. 237, Birkhäuser, Basel (2013), 1–58. 10.1007/3-7643-7341-5_1Search in Google Scholar

[22] E. Frenkel and D. Hernandez, Spectra of quantum KdV Hamiltonians, Langlands duality, and affine opers, Comm. Math. Phys. 362 (2018), no. 2, 361–414. 10.1007/s00220-018-3194-9Search in Google Scholar

[23] E. Frenkel, D. Hernandez and N. Reshetikhin, Folded quantum integrable models and deformed W-algebras, Lett. Math. Phys. 112 (2022), no. 4, Paper No. 80. 10.1007/s11005-022-01565-8Search in Google Scholar

[24] E. Frenkel, P. Koroteev, D. S. Sage and A. M. Zeitlin, q-opers, QQ-systems, and Bethe ansatz, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07344; to appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS). Search in Google Scholar

[25] D. Gaiotto and P. Koroteev, On three dimensional quiver gauge theories and integrability, J. High Energy Phys. (2013), no. 5, Paper No. 126. 10.1007/JHEP05(2013)126Search in Google Scholar

[26] D. Hernandez and B. Leclerc, Cluster algebras and category 𝒪 for representations of Borel subalgebras of quantum affine algebras, Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016), no. 9, 2015–2052. 10.2140/ant.2016.10.2015Search in Google Scholar

[27] P. Koroteev, P. P. Pushkar, A. V. Smirnov and A. M. Zeitlin, Quantum K-theory of quiver varieties and many-body systems, Selecta Math. (N. S.) 27 (2021), no. 5, Paper No. 87. 10.1007/s00029-021-00698-3Search in Google Scholar

[28] P. Koroteev, D. S. Sage and A. M. Zeitlin, ( S ⁢ L ⁢ ( N ) , q ) -Opers, the q-Langlands correspondence, and quantum/classical duality, Comm. Math. Phys. 381 (2021), no. 2, 641–672. 10.1007/s00220-020-03891-1Search in Google Scholar

[29] P. Koroteev and A. M. Zeitlin, Toroidal q-opers, preprint (2020) https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11786; to appear in J. Inst. Math. Jussieu. 10.1017/S1474748021000220Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. Koroteev and A. M. Zeitlin, 3d mirror symmetry for instanton moduli spaces, preprint (2021), https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00588. Search in Google Scholar

[31] D. Masoero, A. Raimondo and D. Valeri, Bethe ansatz and the spectral theory of affine Lie algebra-valued connections I. The simply-laced case, Comm. Math. Phys. 344 (2016), no. 3, 719–750. 10.1007/s00220-016-2643-6Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. Masoero, A. Raimondo and D. Valeri, Bethe ansatz and the spectral theory of affine Lie algebra-valued connections II: The non simply-laced case, Comm. Math. Phys. 349 (2017), no. 3, 1063–1105. 10.1007/s00220-016-2744-2Search in Google Scholar

[33] E. Mukhin and A. Varchenko, Discrete Miura opers and solutions of the Bethe ansatz equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 256 (2005), no. 3, 565–588. 10.1007/s00220-005-1288-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] E. Ogievetsky and P. Wiegmann, Factorized S-matrix and the Bethe ansatz for simple Lie groups, Phys. Lett. B 168 (1986), no. 4, 360–366. 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91644-8Search in Google Scholar

[35] N. Y. Reshetikhin, The spectrum of the transfer matrices connected with Kac-Moody algebras, Lett. Math. Phys. 14 (1987), no. 3, 235–246. 10.1007/BF00416853Search in Google Scholar

[36] N. Y. Reshetikhin and P. B. Wiegmann, Towards the classification of completely integrable quantum field theories (the Bethe-ansatz associated with Dynkin diagrams and their automorphisms), Phys. Lett. B 189 (1987), no. 1–2, 125–131. 10.1142/9789812798336_0030Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky and A. V. Sevostyanov, Drinfeld–Sokolov reduction for difference operators and deformations of 𝒲 -algebras. II. The general semisimple case, Comm. Math. Phys. 192 (1998), no. 3, 631–647. 10.1007/s002200050312Search in Google Scholar