Home Data Privacy Roundup The Government Is Tracking Your Tracking Pixels (And You Should Be, Too)

The Government Is Tracking Your Tracking Pixels (And You Should Be, Too)

SHARE:

Last month, the Federal Trade Commission’s newly launched Office of Technology published a blog post entitled “Lurking Beneath the Surface: Hidden Impacts of Pixel Tracking.”

If you skim the post, you might think it’s just a summary of the FTC’s recent enforcement actions against GoodRx and BetterHelp, along with a quick rundown on how pixel tracking works.

Despite the post’s provocative title, it includes rather anodyne statements, such as this explanation as to why businesses use pixels: “to track consumer behavior (pageviews, clicks, interactions with ads) and to target ads to users who may be more likely to engage or purchase something based on that prior online behavior.”

That is, indeed, why businesses use pixels.

But when Cassidy Sehgal-Kolbet, SVP of finance and legal at L’Oréal US, saw the post, she was “blown away by it,” she told the audience at a public policy and privacy event hosted by the IAB in Washington, DC, earlier this week.

Unhealthy data sharing

Why was Sehgal-Kolbet blown away by a blog post?

Because the FTC isn’t only calling out digital health companies like GoodRx and BetterHelp for sharing health data through pixels with third parties for advertising. It’s “questioning the overall use” of pixel-based ad tracking, she said.

These cases make it clear that regulators have their eye on how data flows between first parties and their partners – and that first parties are responsible for what happens when the data they collect is shared with others.

In a post outlining the FTC’s complaint against BetterHelp, written by Lesley Fair, a senior attorney with the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, she couldn’t be more clear.

“Monitor data flows to all third parties your site or app may transit to via web beacons, pixels or other tracking technologies. It’s illegal to make privacy promises to consumers without taking into account any information that’s going to third parties through various forms of ad tech.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Comic: The Fear Of Finding OutIgnorance is the opposite of bliss

Most companies aren’t intentionally violating the law or ignoring regulatory guidance, Daniel Rosenzweig told me. As a lawyer with Norton Rose Fulbright focused on privacy compliance, he’s got a wide purview.

But there’s often a disconnect between what a company thinks its app or website is doing and what’s actually happening, technically speaking, he said.

Regardless, you are your brother’s keeper (legally, at least).

Arielle Garcia, UM’s chief privacy officer, put it well and succinctly on stage at our Industry Preview conference back in February: “Check your pixels.” Make sure you’re okay with what you’re sharing and that you know what happens when data leaves your site or app.

We’re at a time when lawyers need to become technologists and marketers need to become, well, lawyers.

And there’s “no excuse” for not knowing, Dona Fraser, SVP of privacy initiatives at BBB National Programs, told me when we were chatting this week at the IAPP’s Global Privacy Summit in DC.

“If we were having this conversation five years ago, maybe you could try and claim ignorance,” Fraser said. “You can’t do that anymore.”

In short: Your partner’s pixels, your problem.

Completely unrelated to this article, here’s the best cat video I’ve seen in a long time. (I feel you, kitty.) But, also, let me know what you think of this newsletter. Drop me a line at [email protected].

Must Read

Comic: Off-Platform Media

How RMNs Use MFA And Cheap Inventory To Game Attribution Rules

Retail media is built on its attribution quality, but real purchases can be gamed by programmatic metrics and create perverse incentives for RMNs to serve ads across low-quality inventory.

There’s A Lot Wrong With Google’s And Meta’s Non-Transparent ‘Refund’ Practices

Google and Meta are playing with fire. Their opaque refund practices have already exposed them to customer blowback – and could lead to class-action lawsuits by disgruntled advertisers.

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

How US Intelligence Agencies Buy And Use Programmatic Data For Surveillance

Mike Yeagley, an independent contractor who has scouted and acquired commercial data and technology on behalf of intelligence agencies, is one of the earliest evangelists of using ad tech tracking information to identify and surveil government targets.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Comic: The MFA Cafe

Adalytics Report Torches Ad Tech For Touting MFA Prevention While Scarfing MFA Supply

Practically every ad tech vendor has put out a press release in recent months full of bluster about cutting out made for advertising sites – and yet supply sources remain oversaturated with garbage inventory.

Cloud-Based Collaboration Is Ad Tech’s Post-Cookie Lifeline – But Will It Last?

Cross-cloud data collaboration technology is the best bet for a post-cookie solution. But it’s vulnerable to similar privacy concerns.

Topsort Raises $20 Million To Seize The Post-Cookie Market Opportunity This Year

Topsort raised $20 million, with plans to seize the 2024 opportunity for post-cookie ad tech.