Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

First Responder Peer Support: An Evidence-Informed Approach

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First responders may be exposed to intensely traumatic incidents, with the potential to result in adverse psychological and physiological reactions. Peer support programs have been employed to mitigate these potential effects. Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) has been widely employed as a means of responding to emergency services’ stress responses. This incorporates the use of “Critical Incident Stress Debriefing” (CISD), a technique in which a facilitator helps the rescuer talk about their feelings regarding the incident. Inherent in CISD, psychological debriefing has been described as a brief crisis intervention usually administered within days of a traumatic event. Controversy has arisen over the use of psychological debriefing as a safe and effective tool for peer support. Organizations may be exposed to liability when offering “a practice that is not supported by the preponderance of the available scientific evidence.” Psychological First Aid has been described as an alternative modality, broadly endorsed by expert consensus, which can be readily learned and employed by peer support teams. “Listen, Protect, Connect” is an easy-to-remember means to summarize and approach the concept of Psychological First Aid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • (IASC), I.-A. S. (2007) IASC guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings. IASC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • AAETS (n.d.) About the American academy of experts in traumatic stress. Retrieved from http://www.aaets.org/about3.htm

  • Bledsoe B (2003) Critical incident stress management (CISM): benefit or risk for emergency services? Prehospital Emergency Care, 272–279

  • Devilly G, Cotton P (2004) Caveat emport, caveat venditor, and critical incident stress debriefing/management (CISD/M). Australian Psychologist 39(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eifling K (2015) Evidence-based EMS: disaster scenarios and psychological first aid

  • Everly G (n.d.) A primer on critical incident stress management. International Critical Incident Stress Foundation. Retrieved from https://icisf.org/a-primer-on-critical-incident-stress-management-cism/

  • Everly G, Flynn B (2006) Principles and practical procedures for acute psychological first aid training for personnel without mental health experience. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health 8(2):93–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox JH (2012) The effectiveness of psychological first aid as a disaster intervention tool: research analysis of peer-reviewed literature from 1990-2010. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 247-252

  • Goldstein N, Gist R, McNally R et al (2001) Psychology’s response. Monitor on Psychology 32(10):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann J (2006) Disaster mental health: a critical response. A training curriculum for mental health and spiritual care professionals in healthcare settings. University of Rochester, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs M, Mayou R, Harrison B, Worlock P et al (1996) A randomised controlled trial of psychological debriefing for victims of road traffic sccidents. BMJ 313:1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IACP (2020) Employee mental health and wellness. International Association of Chiefs of Police from https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/Employee%20Mental%20Health%2005-06-2020.pdf

  • Krasnov V, Wessely S (2002) NATO-Russia advanced research workshop on social and psychological consequences of chemical, biological, and radiological terrorism. Belgium, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws T, Hawkins C (1995) Critical incident stress: a normal response to an abnormal situation. Australian Nursing Journal 2(7):32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Litz B, Gray M, Bryant R et al (2002) Early intervention for trauma: current status and future directions. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 9(2):112–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally R, Bryant R, Ehlers A et al (2003) Does early psychological intervention promote recovery from posttraumatic stress? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 4(2)

  • Mitchel J, Everly G (1993) Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD): an operations manual for the prevention of traumatic stress among emergency services and dis-. Chevron, Ellicott City, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J (1983) When disaster strikes...the critical incident debriefing process. JEMS 8:36–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JT, Everly GS (1996) Critical incident stress debriefing: an operations manual. Chevron, Ellicott City, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2018) Post-traumatic stress disorder. NICE guideline (NG116). London: NICE

  • National Institute of Mental Health (2002) Mental health and mass violence: evidence-based early psychological intervention for victims/survivors of mass violence. A workshop to reach consensus on best practices. Washington, D.C.: National Insitutes of Health, U.S. Government Printing Office

  • NSW Institute of Psychiatry and Centre for Mental Health (2000) Disaster mental health response handbook. NSW Health, North Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael B, Wilson J (2000) Psychological debriefing: theory, practice and evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts N, Kitchinier N, Kenardy J et al (2009) Multiple session early psychological debriefing to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

  • Rose S, Bisson J, Churchill R, Wessely S et al (2002) Psychological debriefing to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

  • Shulz S, Forbes D (2014) Psychological first aid rapid proliferation and the search for evidence. Disaster Health 2(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szumilas M, Wei Y, Kutcher S et al (2010) Psychological debriefing in schools. Can Med Assoc J 182(9):883–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Emmerik A, Kamphuis J, Hulsboch A, Emmelkamp P et al (2002) Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: a meta-analysis. Lancet 360(9335):766–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2003). Single-session psychological debriefing: not recommended. Geneva, World Health Organization

  • World Health Organization (2012). Psychological debriefing in people exposed to a recent traumatic event. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Additional Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley S. Feuer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

There were no individual participants precluding the requirement for informed consent to be obtained.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feuer, B.S. First Responder Peer Support: An Evidence-Informed Approach. J Police Crim Psych 36, 365–371 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09420-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09420-z

Keywords

Navigation