Can a High Priest serve with blemishes?

He still has knees and a tongue 👅.

Exodus 20
3You shall have no other gods before Me.a

4You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in the heavens above, on the earth below, or in the waters beneath. 5You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on their children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, 6but showing loving devotion to a thousand generationsb of those who love Me and keep My commandments.

Jesus by bowing is acknowledging there is no other God but the Father.

Also, the Father comes before Jesus in role, time, etc., so he, Jesus, ain't the God.

The original and only testament refutes you.

Turn out the lights, the party's over, pack up your bags and say goodbye 👋. 🎶 🎵

Rotfl...
 
Last edited:
so anyone could do Priestly duty in the Temple?
That's not what I said.

Why do you think Ezekiel 37 - 45 shows the prince serving in the temple alongside the Levitical priests?

Have you read what Josiah did?

just like any Jewish male maybe could be the Messiah now?
If they're of Davidic descent.

and if all Jews keep the Sabbath, like...3 times in a row the Messiah dude of Now will be revealed?
Some say that. Messiah could come at any time.
 
Last edited:
Not quite. This is a Psalm of David. David and his sons are called priests, cohens, in 2 Samuel 8:18.

And? None of these sons were God's son, and none of those sons were observed at the right hand of God and I'm pretty sure all of them are dead. Which of course means they are not priests after the order of Melchizedek.

We don't know where Jesus is standing, nor that he was resurrected. We do know he died, and his family ossuaries were found in Talpiot.

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. I'm sure you don't accept the 1st century observations of Christ's position in heaven, and the conspicuous correlation with the destruction of the temple and the end of the sacrificial system.


Having the same body shows he's destructible. Sorry.

Having the same body shows he was destructible, not that he is destructible.
 
That's why I wrote "proper" in my previous post.



It is because He is also God.
“God is not a man… or a son of man”- Num. 23:19;
“… For he is not a man, that he should repent”-1 Sam. 15:29
“He is not a mere mortal like me that I might answer him, that we might confront each other in court." Job 9:32
"For I am God, and not a man— the Holy One among you." Hosea 11:9
 
“God is not a man… or a son of man”- Num. 23:19;

You left out the part "that He should lie."

Sinful men lie.
God does not.
Jesus never lied.
Jesus is God.

The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia: He is not, like man, subject to whim (Numbers 23:19 Deuteronomy 7:9). He is the Judge, searching the innermost parts of man's being, and knowing all his secrets (Jeremiah 16:17, 17:10, 23:24 Psalm 139:1-4). (God)
God - The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia - (studylight.org)

The Lord Jesus has the same knowledge of all human hearts which proves He is God.
 
You left out the part "that He should lie."

Sinful men lie.
God does not.
Jesus never lied.
Jesus is God.

The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia: He is not, like man, subject to whim (Numbers 23:19 Deuteronomy 7:9). He is the Judge, searching the innermost parts of man's being, and knowing all his secrets (Jeremiah 16:17, 17:10, 23:24 Psalm 139:1-4). (God)
God - The 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia - (studylight.org)

The Lord Jesus has the same knowledge of all human hearts which proves He is God.
Because God not lying is not the relevant portion of the scripture to this topic.

The whole idea of God not lying, is PREDICATED on him not being a man. If you miss this point, I really can't help you.

Four times the Tanakh teaches that God is not a man. FOUR TIMES. it is obviously a very important teaching. Pay attention.

As to your flawed logic, here is a sample of the identical line of reasoning, obviously absurd:
Dogs bark.
Cats do not bark.
Coco the seal does not bark.
Thus Coco is a cat.
 
Last edited:
And? None of these sons were God's son, and none of those sons were observed at the right hand of God and I'm pretty sure all of them are dead.
All of Israel are called God's sons, let alone David. Read Psalm 89. Jesus was never observed at the right hand.

Which of course means they are not priests after the order of Melchizedek.
Of course they are.

I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. I'm sure you don't accept the 1st century observations of Christ's position in heaven, and the conspicuous correlation with the destruction of the temple and the end of the sacrificial system.
I don't.

Having the same body shows he was destructible, not that he is destructible.
Then he needs to get patched up.
 
Because God not lying is not the relevant portion of the scripture to this topic.

It most definitely is.
Balak wanted Balaam to pronounce things that were in favor of Balak.
Balaam would only speak the truth to him.

You are very confused.
 
Last edited:
They worship a false god. That's a fact.

You are very confused.

1 Kings 8:38-39
whatever prayer...is made...then hear in heaven....for You alone know the hearts of all the sons of men (NASB)

Since the Lord Jesus knows the hearts of all the sons of men (all people) demonstrates He is the proper recipient of prayer (John 2:24-25; Acts 1:24; 1 Corinthians 4:5; Revelation 2:23).
 
It most definitely is.
Balak wanted Balaam to pronounce things that were in favor of Balak.
Balaam would only speak the truth to him.

You are very confused.
No, its not. The whole reason why God doesn't lie is BECUASE GOD IS NOT A MAN. Why can't you accept that? If you make God into a man, such as Ceasar, or Jesus, then it means God would tell lies.
 
You are very confused.

1 Kings 8:38-39
whatever prayer...is made...then hear in heaven....for You alone know the hearts of all the sons of men (NASB)

Since the Lord Jesus knows the hearts of all the sons of men (all people) demonstrates He is the proper recipient of prayer (John 2:24-25; Acts 1:24; 1 Corinthians 4:5; Revelation 2:23).
Jesus is just a nice Jewish man. God is not a man. Thus Jesus, like alllllll men, should not be worshiped.

It doesnt do you any good to cite teh NT. We do not consider the NT to be the word of God. It is full of errors.
 
No, its not. The whole reason why God doesn't lie is BECUASE GOD IS NOT A MAN.



And yet Jesus never lied proving He is God.

It doesnt do you any good to cite teh NT.

It does you no good to reject it.

We do not consider the NT to be the word of God.

Which does nothing to detract from the fact that it is the word of God.

It is full of errors.

More unsupportable lies.
 
Back
Top