T Victor, March 2021, "...But while we
often hear that autonomous driving
technology could make a dramatic difference,
before today there has not been a published
scenario-based study that we’re aware of
that looks into how autonomous technology
performs in scenarios that led to fatal
crashes by human drivers. Read more Hmmmm...
John Carlson from Waymo's safety
team gave an excellent presentation at
the 2022 UBC
International Road Safety Symposium showing how the
improved perception contained
in Waymo Driver could have readily
sensed (it is on all the time with a
360 degree view) and then simply
avoided what otherwise was horrible
crashes. The 107MPH red-light
runner who T-boned a left turner is
really sobering). The Waymo Driver
would have seen it coming and simply
braked a little to "let him pass".
No crash! No deaths!
It is great that this system is on Waymo One Driverless cars, but it would be even greater if it was on the cars that we buy in showrooms and that we drive every day. While we can turn our heads and have mirrors, our field of view during any short span of time is extremely limited, even if we are paying attention (if we're texting, it is really small and often zero). I hope that Waymo (and others) will sell these perception systems to OEM so that they'll start appearing on the cars that we drive. If US DoT and NHTSA were really interested in Safety, they would insist (mandate) that such systems be standard in the cars that we buy and drive. Alain
A. Hawkins, Nov. 3, "Waymo is ready to tackle the chaos of airport drop-offs and pickups in Phoenix. The Alphabet company says it is the first autonomous vehicle company to include a busy metropolitan airport in its service area. The company had previously only offered airport trips to its employees with safety drivers behind the wheel.
Read more Hmmmm... Worth reading. Alain
Nov. 1, "On Tuesday, November 1 at 9:41 a.m. ET, Falcon Heavy launched the USSF-44 mission to a geosynchronous Earth orbit from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
A. Hawkins, Nov. 1, "Lyft is laying off 13 percent of its workforce in the second round of major cuts to hit the ride-hailing company this year. The layoffs, which were first reported by The Wall Street Journal, are expected to affect hundreds of roles. Lyft has more than 4,000 employees, which does not include its drivers.
In an email posted on the company’s website, Lyft CEO Logan Green and president John Zimmer cited “a probable recession sometime in the next year” and rising ride-share insurance costs as among the reasons for the layoffs....."Read more Hmmmm... The challenge for the ride-hailing companies is, without being able to jump to driverless, the marginal cost of providing a ride gets more expensive because the marginal driver seeks to earn more than its predecessor. The driver is the dominant cost, and it doesn't have any scale economy. Other than those who are stuck and those traveling on someone else's "nickel" (price insensitive), the market for ride-hailing is capped not far above where the taxi & limo market has been capped for 100 years or more. Ride sharing would allow it to become affordable to many more customers; however, the whole ride-hailing/taxi/limo industry hasn't figured out how to embrace ride-sharing in any meaningful way. They should hire me! Alain
F. Lambert, Nov. 1, "Tesla is starting to release a new Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta software update that includes many high-level changes that should positively impact performance.
A. Hawkins, Oct. 31, " GMC joined forces with the world’s largest supplier of e-bikes for law enforcement to produce an over-the-top, dual-motor, fat tire electric bike to complement its equally over-the-top, dual-motor, fat tire Hummer EV truck. It’s the latest sign that automakers are trying to seize on the popularity of e-bikes to help promote the shift to electric vehicles.
The Hummer EV all-wheel drive e-bike (as it’s referred to in its press release) features twin 750W hub motors with a peak output of 2,400W, a 48-volt / 17 amp-hour LG-made battery (with an option to upgrade to a 21Ah version) and will be available to purchase either online at gmcebike.com or at GMC dealerships for the price of $3,999. (A little expensive for an e-bike, but significantly cheaper than the $112,595 Hummer EV Edition 1.)...." Read more Hmmmm... And I thought that one of the really good things that GM did was kill the original Hummer. Given that today, every EV uses electricity that would have resulted in the burning of less coal had the electricity not been needed for that EV. Today, EVs cause more coal; to be burned to satisfy their needs for electricity. See Laurence Livermore's Energy Flow Charts. So not only is GM's new hummer the return of GM's "Sherman tank" on the road, but this one has the added detriment of running on coal. Does GM have zero social conscience? Alain
A. Hawkins, Nov. 3, "Elon Musk’s first prototype Hyperloop tunnel is no more. Bloomberg reports that the roughly one-mile-long white steel tunnel running along Jack Northrop Avenue near SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, California, has been removed and will be replaced with parking spaces for employees...." Read more Hmmmm...These things were a challenge in NYC in1870 (Beach pneumatic transit) and remain a challenge with the pluses being substantially dominated by the minuses. Alain
https://www.cartsmobility.com/ provided technical support
https://youtu.be/F1qDhRqAA5c?t=106 Michael Sena ..battle over roads
https://youtu.be/F1qDhRqAA5c?t=2004 Michael Sena Saudi linear city plans@t=47 Autonomy
CEO Scott
Painter
K. Korosec,
Oct 26, "Argo
AI, an
autonomous
vehicle
startup that
burst on the
scene in 2017
stacked with a
$1 billion
investment, is
shutting down
— its parts
being absorbed
into its two
main backers:
Ford and VW,
according to
people
familiar with
the matter.
During an
all-hands
meeting
Wednesday,
Argo AI
employees were
told that some
people would
receive offers
from the two
automakers,
according to
multiple
sources who
asked to not
be named. It
was unclear
how many would
be hired into
Ford or VW and
which
companies will
get Argo’s
technology.
Employees were
told they
would receive
a severance
package that
includes
insurance and
two separate
bonuses — an
annual award
plus a
transaction
bonus upon the
deal close
with Ford and
VW. All Argo
employees will
receive these.
For those who
are not
retained by
Ford or VW,
they will
additionally
receive
termination
and severance
pay, including
health
insurance.
Several people
told
TechCrunch
that it was a
generous
package and
that the
founders of
the company
spoke directly
to its more
than 2,000
employees..." ... Certainly a
"class act"
way to shut
down.
"...said
Farley. “It’s
mission-critical for Ford to develop great and differentiated L2+ and L3
applications
that at the
same time make
transportation
even safer.”
Farley also
insinuated
that Ford
would be able
to buy AV tech
down the line,
instead of
developing it
in house.
“We’re
optimistic
about a future
for L4 ADAS,
but
profitable,
fully
autonomous
vehicles at
scale are a
long way off
and we won’t
necessarily
have to create
that
technology
ourselves,”
... Read more Hmmmm... What???
What is "L4
ADAS"??? You
are really
going to do L3
which many
believe is
harder than
L4. L3 is
going to
require that
Ford accept
the safety
liability and
the "obey all
the legal
operation"
liability for
the life of
the vehicle
whenever the
driver is able
to engage that
functionality. There is NO WAY Ford or really any OEM is ever going to
take on that
substantive
amount of
liability
unless there
is such an
abundance of
fine print
that it makes
Elon's
proclamations
about FSD seem
like junior
varsity.
We
all understand
that "L2+" is
today's
"50s-style
chrome &
fins"
propelling the
selling cars
in showrooms
as OEMs have
always done.
Absolutely no
need to get to
driverless (L4
in some
societly or
commercially
viable ODD).
Idf
someone does
develop (as I
quoted last
week) Schumpeter’s
Disruptive
Technology
Threshold …: "... [I]n capitalist reality…,
it is not
[price]
competition
which counts
but the
competition
from the new
commodity, the
new
technology…-
competition
which commands
a decisive
cost or
quality
advantage and
which strikes
not at the
margins of the
profits and
the outputs of
the existing
firms but at
their
foundations
and their very
lives.” Joseph A Shumpeter (1883-1950)”, it is going
to simply make
it available
to allow Ford
to continue to
serve its
customers or
will use it to
crush Ford? Alain
L. Sumagaysay, Oct. 27, "...", Read more Hmmmm... Another view. Alain
A. Hawkins, Oct. 26, "...." Read more Hmmmm... Andrew's view. Alain
A. Hawkins, Oct. 27, "When Ford announced yesterday that it was pulling its support for Argo AI, the autonomous driving startup it had financed since 2017, it cited as one of its reasons a belief that driver-assist technology will have more near-term payoffs....." Read more Hmmmm... I agree with Andrew, as I stated above. Alain
Russ Mitchell,
Oct 19, 2022
“The company,
owned by
Google parent
Alphabet, said
Wednesday that
it plans to
make L.A. its
next market.
“L.A. is in
the top three
ride-hailing
markets in the
United States
and globally,”
said Saswat
Panigrahi, the
company’s
chief product
officer. “The
commercial
opportunity is
huge.”
But Waymo offered scant information about its plans, including when the commercial service will begin and how extensive the service’s coverage will be….” Read more Hmmmm... or what the service will be? Ride-hailing??? Compete with Uber/Lyft… good luck! After leading the "testing phase" for the last 13 years, this is their plan for the "deployment phase". So disappointing! Doesn’t come close to meeting Schumpeter’s Disruptive Technology Threshold …: "... [I]n capitalist reality…, it is not [price] competition which counts but the competition from the new commodity, the new technology…- competition which commands a decisive cost or quality advantage and which strikes not at the margins of the profits and the outputs of the existing firms but at their foundations and their very lives.” Joseph A Shumpeter (1883-1950)”. Alain
Tesla Staff,
Sept. 30,
"Streamed
live..." Read
more Hmmmm...
I'm not much
of a fan of
humanoids so
you may skip
the first
hour; however,
starting @
0:58:00 - FSD
Intro, the
next hour and
a half is
substantive
and a must
watch. My
takeaway
remains
driverless
"everywhere"
is so
enormously
challenging
that the
near-term
opportunity
(next 10
years) to sell
such a vehicle
to a consumer
is simply
unthinkable.
The terms
&
conditions
would need to
be so onerous
making the
total
addressable
market
essentially
null.
That said, I suspect that there exist some, possibly many, societally beneficial Operational Design Domains (ODD), where "FSD 69.2.2" or near term releases can deliver safe driverless mobility. This deployment strategy is what I with the technical support of CARTS, Inc. have decided to focus on. Alain
Sept 28, M. Sena, "IN THE PAST, when a country believed it was not receiving enough of a resource that it felt it needed and deserved, it went to war to take it. Gold, silver, tea, spices, cotton, cod, coal, grain, oil and many other commodities have been the causes of nations attempting to steal land and seas from other nations. There are countless numbers of movies that show us the horrors of war, but the postapocalyptical MAD MAX film series gives us a glimpse of what it could look like after all the big wars have been fought and lost. Warlords and their gangs prey on survivors of the wars that caused societies everywhere to collapse. They battle each other over gasoline, water and food. Are we trading wars over oil for wars over lithium, cobalt, nickel and rare earth metals, jumping from one frying pan into another? As governments continue with their policies to dramatically increase demand for these commodities, the chances for expanded conflicts increase. In many areas, they have already begun. ..." Read more Another excellent issue. Enjoy! Also watch or listen:ZoomCast 285 /PodCast 285 Alain
D. Hall, Aug.
9, "Tesla, GM,
Volkswagen and
Ford are among
the automakers
set to get big
orders from
Autonomy, a
startup
offering
drivers the
option of
subscribing to
an electric
vehicle
instead of
buying one
outright.
Autonomy plans
to announce
Tuesday that
it’s ordering
nearly 23,000
EVs from 17
different
automakers for
a total outlay
of $1.2
billion. With
chip shortages
limiting
production
capacity at
most
automakers,
it’s unclear
how soon such
a fleet could
be amassed.
The order
represents
1.2% of the
projected US
electric
vehicle
production
through the
end of next
year... .” Read
more Hmmmm...
While this is
a very
interesting
play for an
individual to
acquire a
subscription
to have a
"Drive-it-Yourself" (DiY) electric car
that gives the
individual anywhere
& anytime
mobility. The
subscription
is acquired
using a simple
anywhere &
anytime mobile
phone app (the
"autonomy" of
the concept)
that bundles,
insurance,
maintenance,
taxes, the
vehicle,...
Essentially
everything
except the
electricity.
Just DiY it
and get from
where you are
to where you
want to go
when you want
to "Just do
It" (JdI).
All at an attractive monthly subscription
charge when
you consider
all that is
bundled. This
is DiY/MaaSS
(Mobility as a
SubscriptionService) for those that can DiY.
See the Bloomberg Video and well as
SmartDrivingCars ZoomCast
279 / PodCast
279 w/Scott
Painter, CEO
Autonomy
E. Musk, Aug. 4, .” Read more Hmmmm... Watch the Q & A portion starting about an hour in from the start. Watch especially the comments about his vision of the Tesla RoboTaxi (aka driverless cars, what I prefer to call autonomousTaxis or aTaxis, the new "Modern Transit"). The key visions are:
While I don't
agree with the
option of
owning your
own and
renting it out
"AirB&B
-style where
B&B =
Mobility". It
is easier and
more likely to
begin by
having a
Professional
entity
managing a
fleet of Tesla
RoboTaxis that
provide
mobility to
the everyone
in the
community.
This will be
the the
"Modern Public
Transit". An
example being
Trenton MOVES
using a fleet
of Tesla
RoboTaxis.
For these
RoboTaxis to
be attractive
to a fleet
operator, they
will need to
be styled
differently
than consumer
versions that
are sold to
individuals.
The RoboTaxi
will need to
be easy to get
in and out and
interface well
with
wheelchairs.
They'll need
to accommodate
ride-sharing
(personTrips
are the source
of the
revenue, not
vehicle
sales). They
should have
4-wheel
steering so
they will
never need to
back up in
stub-end
operation. He
has re
imagined the
pickup truck.
Certainly, he
can re-imagine
a car focused
on providing
safe,
equitable,
affordable,
sustainable
high-quality
mobility
throughout a
community.
At the end of addressing the future of Robotasis he states ..." assuming we do all these things, I think, probably, Tesla will be the most valuable company in the world."
While a great
vision, this
is simply not
realistic. He
started
selling Teslas
in California,
not throughout
the whole
country. He
fully
understands
that one must
crawl before
one walks,
before one
runs.
As you might suspect, I have the ideal "California" for him to first deploy his RoboTaxis and its not California or Arizona. It is New Jersey: Trenton, NJ or Perth Amboy, NJ or Patterson, NJ or many other cities in New Jersey where the mobility offered by Tesla RoboTaxis would be life changing to many while becoming an interesting alternative to everyone else. DoJo can more readily regress the coefficients to deliver safe driverless operation within any one of these Operational Design Domains (ODD) rather than trying to do them all simultaneously. Coefficients can/should be tied to ODDs rather than having one "magical" set that works in all ODDs. It is trivial for the Operating system to load the coefficients that work best in theRoboTaxi's current ODD. This should allow RoboTaxis to demonstrate their technical, economic and societal virtues much sooner in these communities. Market success will fuel expansion and replication in the delivery of safe, equitable, affordable, sustainable, high-quality mobility so that is spreads beyond New Jersey to California and beyond just like the purchase of the first Teslas spread from California to New Jersey and beyond.
@
t=7417 Elon
is asked about
the Boring
Company.
True, if one
could bore
tunnels
inexpensively,
it would be
great for
longer
distance
travel.
Certainly, all
of the
freeways in
and around
cities would
be placed
underground.
High Speed
rail on the
NorthEast
Corridor can
only go
underground
for long
stretches.
Bringing the
Dinky to a
Nassau Street
terminus must
be done
underground.
By the way
Washington
Road should be
underground
eradicating
the cancer
that it is as
a surface
street
severing the
Princeton
Campus. Then
there is Rt.
29 that
devastated
Trenton by
barricading
the western
part of
Trenton from
the Delaware
River and Rt.
129 that
severed
neighborhoods;
a scenario
that was
repeated in
essentially
every city to
accommodate
through-moving
surface
travel. They
should all go
underground.
There is much
good that
could be
done. The
challenge is
the above if.
@
t=6665 "when disengaging
autoPilot with
the wheel, the
accelerator
stays on.
Please fix it!"
Maybe...
touching or
not touching
the steering
wheel has
little in
common with
acceleration
(and braking)
which is (are)
controlled by
the feet. The
steering
control should
be readily
overcome by
input of a
torque on the
steering
wheel;
however, the
steering
control should
revert to
dominance if
the driver
ceases to
exhort a
torque on the
wheel.
Moreover,
torquing the
steering wheel
should not
disengage the
brake or the
throttle.
With respect to the driver actions on the brake and throttle:
Driver input
from the
throttle
should have
precedence
over
"intelligent
cruise control
(ICC)" input
to the
throttle and
brake and
should NOT
turn off the
system simply
because the
driver touched
the
accelerator
pedal.
For the
brake, it is a
little
different.
Tapping the
brake should
turn off the
acceleration
function of
the ICC.
Acceleration
should remain
off until the
driver
explicitly
re-engages
it. Moreover,
driver input
to the brake,
if less than
what the ICC
calls for,
should always be
dominated by
the ICC's
desire to
brake.
Tapping of the
brakes should
not turn off
the braking
function of
the ICC. That
intelligent
brakig
function
should
continue to
keep m fro
getting to
close to the
vehicle in
front of me.
The
acceleration
function has
been turned
off so I won't
accelerate
into the back
of the car
ahead of me
and the
braking
function
should
continue to do
its best to
keep a proper
separation
between me and
the vehicle
ahead.
Turning the
whole system
off placing me
completely in
control should
require an
explicit
action by me
that indicates
I'm knowingly
usurping
responsibility.
Reuters, July
26, "General
Motors Co
(GM.N) has
lost nearly $5
billion since
2018 trying to
build a
robotaxi
business in
San Francisco,
and now as the
automaker's
Cruise unit
starts
charging for
rides, the
losses are
accelerating.
GM said on
Tuesday it
lost $500
million on
Cruise during
the second
quarter - more
than $5
million a day
- as it began
charging for
rides in a
limited area
of San
Francisco. ... that may
be the case
for the last
quarter, but
the chart
below from GM's
6/30/222 10-Q
Shows ($800M)
for the last 6
months or
$4.38/day when
divided by
182.625
Whew!😅...
Cruise's
costly effort
to transform
autonomous
driving
technology
from a
long-term
research
project to a
profit-spinning
business comes
as investors
are backing
away from
riskier bets
on technology,
and
reassessing
how soon robot
vehicles of
any kind will
be deployed in
large scale on
public roads.
Shares of autonomous vehicle technology company Aurora Innovation Inc (AUR.O), for example, are down 80% for the year to date. Shares of robo-trucking company TuSimple Holdings Inc (TSP.O) have lost more than 70% of their value. Some automakers, including Ford Motor Co (F.N), have scaled back investments in automated vehicle units, or taken on partners to share the costs....
Cruise's
losses for the
first six
months of the
year deepened
to $900
million from
$600 million
during the
same period in
2021 - when
Cruise was not
charging for
rides. Higher
compensation
costs to keep
staff on board
after putting
aside plans
for an IPO
were one
factor in the
results, GM
executives
said.
Chief
Executive Mary
Barra said on
Tuesday she is
still bullish
on Cruise, and
reaffirmed a
forecast that
the unit could
generate $50
billion a year
in revenue
from automated
vehicle
services and
technology by
2030. .” Read
more Hmmmm...
Nice
optimism. The
source of the
reality check
above comes
from GM's
6/30/222 10-Q.
Start reading
from page 41.
then on page
43:
[log in to unmask]" width="635" height="98">
Whoa! The
only nice
thing that can
be imagined is
by assuming
that they've
had
essentially
zero revenue,
the operating
costs have
"only" been
$800M for the
last 6
months. That
is non-small.
I'd like to suggest that the strategy of trying to create a profitable driverless mobility service for folks that already have 2 or more cars in their garage, have excellent public transit service or travel on expense accounts when wanting to go to between the airport and "downtown" may not be the wisest way to launch such a mobility service. There is little opportunity to be substantially better or even equivalent to what those potential customers already have. Little opportunity to get loyal and repeat customers. The focus to date has been too heavily weighted on getting the technology to work for folks who already have more mobility options than they know what to do with. Great for click-bait; challenging for the 10-Q. What must Waymo's 10-Q Cash Flow chart look like?
Capturing loyal and repeat customers is really tough when the competition is excellent and entrenched. While pricing can be high, volume is almost non-existent even with nominal pricing. Except for the novelty, the marketplace in the Chandlers and SFs is essentially non-existent. To date those markets have been quiet, at best. What must Waymo's 10-Q Cash Flow chart look like?
It astonishes
me that to
date none of
the leading
driverless
companies have
spent any
money trying
to serve the
needs of folks
that don't own
cars, aren't
traveling
using someone
else's money,
nor have
access to a
good public
transit system
focused on
their mobility
needs.
These folks
definitely
can't pay as
much for a
ride as those
that are being
chased by
Cruise &
Waymo, but
there are more
of them.
Moreover, its
almost trivial
to provide
them with a
mobility
option that is
substantially
better than
what they have
today for
many, if not
most, of their
daily
personTrips.
This is the market that we've found in New Jersey; in Trenton & Mercer County, Perth Amboy & Middlesex County and Patterson & Passaic County. We haven't even begun looking in Newark, Camden, Atlantic City and the rest of New Jersey.
The excuse
seems to have
been that it
would be too
expensive to
deal with NJ's
bad weather,
even though,
we've made it
clear that New
jersey is not
interested in
a 365.25
days/yr.
mobility
solution.
We'd be more
than pleased
with a 350
days/yr.
operation.
New Jersey has
more than 350
good days a
year. We
aren't so
entitled that
we can't wait
for the
hurricane to
blow through,
the snow to be
shoveled or
the fog to
lift before we
go about our
normal
business. We
enjoy the
"snow day" at
home. We are
convinced that
is actually
easier and
cheaper to
capture
recurring and
loyal NJ
customers.
The
rule-of-thumb
for a
Trenton-MOVES
style
operation is:
a vehicle
needs to serve
at least 100
personTrips/day.
With slightly
better
ride-sharing
and
time-of-day
pricing, one
might be able
to get to 150
personTrips/day. To cover a fleet of 100 vehicles, ridership needs to
be about 10k
to 15k
personTrips/day.
This kind of
utilization
leads to per
personTrip
capitalization
costs of less
that
$1/personTrip
for vehicles
costing
upwards of
$150k @
interest rates
upward of
7.5%. That is
to say, $1/personTrip
readily covers the
vehicle
capital costs
even at
moderate
scales.
Given
that trips
on-average are
less than five
miles, vehicle
operating
costs are less
than
$1/personTrip.
Management
costs are
largely fixed.
With volume
the per
personTrip
burden
decrease
enormously,
and can't be
more than
$0.50/personTrip.
Break-even
fare is thus
roughly
$2.50/personTrip.
An average market fare of $3.50/personTrip delivers a profit of >$1.00/personTrip, >$100/vehicle-day.
A fleet of 100 vehicles delivers a profit >$10k/day, >$3.0M/yr. in the Trenton ODD serving 10k personTrips/day.
From where do these 10k personTrips/day materialize?
Essentially all the riders of NJ Transit rail would love a simple reliable convenient way to get to & from the train. By on-demand service within the community around the train station, loyalty upwards of 80% could be achieved for anyone wanting to go to NYC or within walking distance to any other NJ train station. For Trenton that represents a marketplace of 8,000 personTrips/day that currently drive to & from the station every day and those that currently don't use the train that would if it was easy and reliable to them to get to AND from the station, when they wanted to get to and from there. Half of the 10k would easily come from serving the Trenton Train Station.
Trenton Central HS has 1,800 students. More than 1,500 live more than a 10 minute walk to the TCHS. Truancy is proportional to how far a student has to walk to school. Trenton MOVES could readily serve 1,250 of these students every day. That's 1/4 of the needed 10k.
We only need
another 2.5k
personTrips
and we haven't
even begun
dealing with
getting people
to & from
work in
Trenton,
doctors,
shopping
visiting
friends, etc.
needed by the
70% of Trenton
households who
have access to
one or zero
cars. 100
vehicles
serving 10k
personTrips/day
making
>3.0M/year
@ an average
fare of
$3.50/personTrip
is just the
start of a
profitable
business.
Employing 200
vehicles
costing at
most $100k at
interest rates
of less than
7.5% serving
150
personTrips/day
at fares of
$3.00/personTrip
makes way more
than $5M per
year.
Expanding
Trenton MOVES
throughout
Mercer County
giving the
opportunity to
increase
average fare
(because of
the longer
personTrips)
to maybe
$5/personTrip
keeping
utilization @
150
personTrips/vehicle-day
of a fleet of
1,000 vehicles
and doing a
little better
on interest
rates and cap
costs can lead
to profits of
>$10M/year
for
Trenton/Mercer
MOVES. There
are at least
10
replications
of
Trenton/Mercer
MOVES that
could be done
in NJ by 2030
utilizing a
fleet of at
least 10,000
vehicles
leading to a
profit of
>$100M/year.
This kind of
success leads
to having many
more people
leave their
cars at home
and
frequenting
NJ-MOVES as
their mobility
system. This
could lead to
a NJ-Moves
fleet of
>100,000
vehicles is
generating a
profit of
>$1B.
Reuters, July
16, "China's
search engine
giant Baidu
Inc on
Thursday
unveiled its
new autonomous
vehicle (AV)
with a
detachable
steering
wheel, with
plans to put
it to use for
its robotaxi
service in
China next
year.
Cost per unit
will drop to
250,000 yuan ($37,031.55) for the new
model,
compared with
480,000 yuan
for the
previous
generation,
Baidu said in
a statement.
“This massive
cost reduction
will enable us
to deploy tens
of thousands
of AVs across
China,"
Baidu's chief
executive
Robin Li said
at the Baidu
World
conference.
"We are moving
towards a
future where
taking a
robotaxi will
be half the
cost of taking
a taxi today.” Read
more Hmmmm...
Really?? See
video.
Where do I buy
10 for
immediate
delivery to
New Jersey
with option to
buy 100 more
by EoY'22 and
1st inline to
buy 1,000 more
by EoY'23. eMail me!!!
While the design is certainly not ideal for "Trenton MOVES" or "Perth Amboy MOVES" they would be good enough to get started with addressing the "Sociology Challenges" of MOVES-style deployments. And the price is right if this isn't total click-bait. But... that is a really big if . 🙁 Alain
June 15, Press
release,
"Today, as
part of the
U.S.
Department of
Transportation’s efforts to increase roadway safety and encourage
innovation,
the National
Highway
Traffic Safety
Administration published
the initial
round of data it
has collected
through its Standing
General Order issued
last year and
initial
accompanying
reports
summarizing
this data.
The SAE Level
2 advanced
driver
assistance
systems
summary report
is
available here,
while the SAE
Levels 3-5
automated
driving
systems
summary report is
available here.
Going forward,
NHTSA will
release data
updates
monthly..." Read
more Hmmmm...
This is a good
start;
however, as
NHTSA repeats
many times,
this is just a
start and
there are many
"data
limitations".
The most
severe may
well be the
possibility of
substantial "sampling
bias", the
most severe of
which is that
each OEM
sourced the
reported data
very
differently.
That makes the
data between
OEMs
incomparable.
Also un reported is any measure that would enable a "crash rate" for an OEM to be determined. One only has a numerator value but no denominator value.
Finally, 392 crashes of "Level 2" cars
were reported
during the
"10" month
period of July
2021 and May
15, 2022.
About 12
million
vehicles are
involved in
traffic
crashes every
year among the
283 million
vehicles that
operate in the
US. Assuming
any one
vehicle is
unlikely to be
involved in
more than one
crash per yer,
it means that
each vehicle,
on average is
involved in
12M/283M =
0.0424 crashes
per year.
Thus, if these
ADAS cars were
involved in
crashes at the
average rate,
and had their
ADAS on all
the time, the
500 vehicle
crashes per
year contained
in these data
would expect
to be
generated from
a fleet of
only about
11,800
vehicles (or
0.0042% of the
vehicles
("everything
being equal",
ADAS on all
the time.).
Consequently, either, ...
Anyway. It
is a start and
at least to me
the numbers
are not
startling.
What needs
improvement is
sourcing of
the
incidents.
Maybe OtA
should be
mandated. At
minimum, the
VIN should
specify the
existence of
theses
capabilities.
Then normal
police
reportings can
begin to
"automatically"
access the "black
box event
recorders"
(see also Accident
data recorder and NHTSA)
that are in
most cars
today.
Unfortunately, privacy
concerns makes
this
not-easy. So
here we are.
It wont be
easy to do
much better,
but we should
continue to
try.
What the data
do point out
is that a
substantial
number of the
crashes
involved the
rear ending of
a stationary
object. I
have pointed
out repeatedly
that the
source code of
these systems
explicitly
disregard
stationary
objects in the
lane ahead.
Justifying
this explicit
process is
that current
sensors incur
unacceptable
false
positives when
trying to
determine if
sufficient
headroom
exists under
detected
stationary
object in the
lane ahead.
Thus, to avoid
braking in
response to
these rare
false
positives,
stationary
objects in the
lane ahead are
all assumed to
be "pass
under-able".
As one
drives, one
encounters
many
stationary
objects in the
lane ahead.
These are
readily sensed
and precisely
located
ahead.
Readily sensed
are
overpasses,
signs, tree
canopies,
traffic
lights, ...
all of which
can usually be
readily passed
under. (As
can vehicles
ahead that
come to rest
in
vehicle-follower
mode. These
are not
disregarded
because one is
in
vehicle-follower
mode.)
But when one
is in
vehicle-leader
mode and one
encounters a
stationary
object ahead,
I believe,
most, if not
all "Level 2"
systems
disregard that
object and
assume the car
can pass
underneath.
So if you are
in vehicle
leader mode
and come over
the crest of a
hill to be
confronted
with a stopped
object ahead,
your system
will disregard
that object.
Similarly, if
the vehicle
that you are
following
changes lanes
forcing you to
become a
leader, any
stationary
object ahead
will be
disregarded.
Alain
The 5th Summit: https://www.cartsmobility.com/summit
A. Nathans,
May 11, "When
Serena Ren
presented her
senior thesis
on using
machine
learning for
art appraisals
last month,
she hoped to
see her
friend, Joyce
Luo, present
her thesis on
fighting
opioid
addiction. But
since all
students in
the Department
of Operations
Research and
Financial
Engineering
present their
theses in
parallel
sessions, this
was
impossible.
But on May 4,
Ren and Luo
finally got to
see each
other’s
presentations
in a classroom
in Sherrerd
Hall, thanks
to the
department’s
first-ever
event in which
selected
students
present their
thesis work to
the whole
department....
" Read
more Hmmmm...
I'm so proud!
Hopefully
we'll be able
to release the
video so you
can enjoy.
Keep trying
the link:
PAVE, May 4,
"Autonomous
vehicle
technologies
offer
incredible
potential:
they could
make our
highways
safer, they
could offer
new mobility
options for
people who
can’t drive,
and they could
help create a
more equitable
transportation
system for
those who are
not
well-served by
our current
system.
During the
month of May,
we are
highlighting
places where
AVs are in use
— today —
being
deployed,
tested, and
used for
public good.
We want to
look at
examples of
the technology
being used to
serve food
deserts, to
expand access
to rural
communities,
to offer new
accessibility
options, and
more.
We are
starting with
the Trenton
MOVES
initiative,
which is the
first
large-scale
urban transit
system in
America based
entirely on
self-driving
shuttles. The
shuttles,
which carry
four to eight
passengers,
serve
traditionally
underserved
Trenton
neighborhoods,
where 70% of
households
have limited
access to a
single
automobile, or
no access at
all. Our
panelists will
detail the
program,
describing how
it works, the
results it has
achieved, and
their vision
for the
future......" Read
more Hmmmm... Very
nice. Be sure
to watch video 😁 and see ZoomCast
267 Alain
P. Keller, April 29, "New Jersey recently announced a $5 million grant for the Trenton Mobility & Opportunity: Vehicles Equity System or MOVES Project. The grant to the City of Trenton will support the planned start up and eventual deployment of 100 Autonomous Vehicles that will provide an on-demand automated transit system to serve the 90,000 residents of Trenton....." Read more Hmmmm... Very nice. 😁 AlainSaturday, April 23, 2022
H.
Jin, April 6,
"Electric
carmaker Tesla
(TSLA.O) will
make a
"dedicated"
self-driving
taxi that will
"look
futuristic,"
Chief
Executive Elon
Musk said on
Thursday,
without giving
a timeframe.
The
50-year-old
billionaire,
wearing a
black cowboy
hat and
sunglasses,
made the
comments at
the opening of
Tesla's $1.1
billion
factory in
Texas, which
is home to its
new
headquarters.
"Massive scale. Full self-driving. There's going to
be a dedicated
robotaxi,"
Musk told a
large crowd at
the
factory...." Read
more
Elon followed the graceful rollout of his Supercharger infrastructure which enabled the upper-middle class that doesn't have a backup fleet and needs to have a toy and reliably go back and forth to grandma's house. Viola!!! No longer just a toy. Seamless evolution to "Massive Scale" scale and Massive Profitability.
RoboTaxis' evolution
to "Massive
Scale" is
turning out to
be different.
Starting with
rich
WesternStaters
doesn't seem
to be working
sociologically
for Waymo.
The rides
offered seem
to be taken
for
entertainment
and side-show
purposes
rather than
valued
enablers of
enhanced
quality of
life. Nice
for selfies,
but not much
more.
Recall fundamental value is to provide a safe, high-quality ride from A to B. "Safe" is "safe", but "high-quality" is relative to what one now has readily available. For the rich, that's where they've already put a lot of money to create for themselves something really nice. The chances someone is going to offer something better to an individual that has crafted something perfect for themselves is slim-to-none. Consequently, the service is used primarily for taking selfies.
For those that
don't have
their own car
for whatever
reason (can't
drive, don't
want to, too
young, too
old, and/or
too poor)
their mobility
options are
simply
dreadful.
Absolutely
trivial for an
aTaxi service
to be viewed
as the quality
winner and
used to
provide
customer
accessibility,
improved
quality of
life,
endearment,
respect, love,
appreciation,
loyalty, and
use.
Consequently, if Elon is really serious about achieving "Massive Scale" then he should basically flip his Tesla strategy and start by focusing on serving the mobility needs of those that will fully appreciate and gain the most personal value from his market offering;
These are the customers of Trenton MOVES; only about 50,000 of Trenton's 90,000 population; but 50,000 that will really appreciate you. Start by only serving Trenton's 8 square mile area with about 100 vehicles and only during the best 350 days out of the year's 365.25.
They'll be so
appreciative
and you will
have provided
the spark that
will allow
your aTaxis
to go viral! You'll quickly serve Mercer county,
Newark,
Camden,
Atlantic City,
New Brunswick,
Toms River,
Perth Amboy,
all of New
Jersey,
Eastern
Pennsylvania,
New York City
(except
Manhattan),
Long Island,
.....
That's the natural road to "Massive Scale" for Mobility for all. Start with those in most need and evolve to convert those that will leave their own cars parked in their driveway.
"Massive Scale" starts with Trenton MOVES. Alain
The Waymo
Team, March
30, "This
morning in San
Francisco, a
fully
autonomous
all-electric
Jaguar I-PACE,
with no human
driver behind
the wheel,
picked up a
Waymo engineer
to get their
morning coffee
and go to
work. Since
sharing that
we were ready
to take the
next step and
begin testing
fully
autonomous
operations in
the city,
we’ve begun
fully
autonomous
rides with our
San Francisco
employees.
They now join
the thousands
of Waymo One
riders we’ve
been serving
in Arizona,
making fully
autonomous
driving
technology
part of their
daily
lives...." Read
more Hmmmm... Congratulations!
Enormous
accomplishment
and
fundamental
expression of
confidence in
your
technology.
Please come to
New Jersey
where we are
certain that
you can
actually
delier "Safe,
Equitable,
Affordable,
Sustainable,
HIgh-quality
Mobility" that
will
substantially
improve the
quality-of-life
of many by
transforming
affordable
housing into
affordable
living and
more.
K. Pyle, Feb. 9, "Dr. Alain Kornhauser’s vision of bringing equitable, sustainable, and affordable mobility to the people of Trenton took another step forward with the February 9th, 2022 announcement (Facebook) of a $5 million NJDOT Local Transportation Planning Fund Grant for the Trenton Mobility & Opportunity: Vehicles Equity System (MOVES) Project (PDF). The significance of this event goes beyond the grant announcement..." Read more Hmmmm... Ken, thank you for the kind words. Alain
W. Skaggs, Feb. 3,"We are excited to invite you to join Mayor Gusciora, N.J. Department of Transportation (NJDOT) Commissioner Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti, and Trenton Public Schools Superintendent James Earle to celebrate a $5 million award from the NJDOT Local Transportation Projects Fund for an unprecedented public transportation project right here in the Capital City. The project is called the Trenton Mobility & Opportunity: Vehicular Equity System (MOVES) initiative.
Originally announced by Governor Murphy and Commissioner Gutierrez-Scaccetti in December, TrentonMOVES seeks to provide a safe, equitable, and affordable high-quality on-demand mobility service to Trenton residents. The effort is a collaboration between the Governor’s Office, NJDOT, the City of Trenton, and Princeton University.
The $5 million award is a huge milestone for the project. This will be the first large-scale urban transit system in America to be based entirely on self-driving shuttles. Each vehicle will carry four to eight passengers at a time. The AVs will be low-cost to users in underserved neighborhoods. The high school will be one of the central destinations on the first routes.
The event will
take place at 11:00 a.m. on
Wednesday,
Feb. 9, 2022
in the Trenton
Central High
School
auditorium.
Members of the
press will be
invited to
attend. ...." Read
more Hmmmm... Another
real
milestone.
The
Trenton MOVES
RfEI closed
February 25,
with 20
submittals.
Next comes the 5thPrinceton
SmartDrivingCar Summit June 2 -> 4, 2022 in Princeton &
Trenton, NJ.
The Summit
will be
focused on
enabling
Trentonians to
get a first
glimpse at
technology and
mobility
systems that
can deliver
Trenton MOVES'
mobility
objectives
(Safety,
Equity,
Affordability,
Sustainability,..) and, very importantly, enabling technology and
mobility
companies to
learn the
market
opportunities
available to
be captured in
Trenton, the
rest of Mercer
County, and
throughout New
Jersey.
Trenton MOVES is a win-win opportunity for the citizens of New Jersey (The Public) and the shareholders of mobility provider(s) (The Private), who can come together in a Trenton MOVES Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) that will be created through a Request for Proposal (RfP) process commencing shortly after the close of the Summit. 😁 Alain