Abstract
Resurgence of previously suppressed behavior can occur when differential reinforcement is discontinued. Recent research has investigated strategies to mitigate resurgence, including punishing the target response during alternative reinforcement. A punishment strategy consisting of reinforcer loss contingent on the target response (response cost) does not appear to attenuate resurgence, but these effects had not been replicated with other negative-punishment procedures, such as timeouts. This study investigated effects of timeouts on subsequent resurgence when adults responded to earn points during a computer task. Timeouts did not affect subsequent resurgence. These findings, in combination with previous research, suggest that negative punishment may not reduce the likelihood of subsequent resurgence.
Data Availability
Data files are publicly available at https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/
References
Bolívar, H. A., & Dallery, J. (2020). Effects of response cost magnitude on resurgence of human operant behavior. Behavioural Processes, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104187
Brantner, J. P., & Doherty, M. A. (1983). A review of timeout: A conceptual and methodological analysis. In S. Axelrod & J. Apsche (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior (pp. 87–132). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Donaldson, J. M., & Vollmer, T. R. (2011). An evaluation and comparison of time-out procedures with and without release contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-693.
Fleshler, M., & Hoffman, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5(4), 529–530. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529.
Kestner, K., Redner, R., Watkins, E. E., & Poling, A. (2015). The effects of punishment on resurgence in laboratory rats. The Psychological Record, 65, 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0107-y.
Kestner, K. M., Diaz-Salvat, C. C., St. Peter, C. C., & Peterson, S. M. (2018). Assessing the repeatability of resurgence in humans: Implications for the use of within-subject designs. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110(3), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.477.
Kestner, K. M., Romano, L. M., St. Peter, C. C., & Mesches, G. A. (2018). Resurgence following response cost in a human-operant procedure. The Psychological Record, 68, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0270-7.
Kuroda T., Gilroy, S. P., Cançado, C. R. X., & Podlesnik, C. A. (2020). Effects of punishing target response during extinction on resurgence and renewal in zebrafish. Behavioural Processes, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104191
Lattal, K. A., Cançado, C. R. X., Cook, J. E., Kincaid, S. L., Nighbor, T. D., & Oliver, A. C. (2017). On defining resurgence. Behavioral Processes, 141, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.04.018.
Lattal, K. A., & Oliver, A. C. (2020). The control response in assessing resurgence: Useful or compromised tool? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 113(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.570.
Nall, R. W., & Shahan, T. A. (2019). Resurgence of punishment-suppressed cocaine seeking in rats. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000317
Okouchi, H. (2015). Resurgence of two-response sequences punished by point-loss response cost in humans. Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 41(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v41.i2.63744.
St. Peter, C. C. (2015). Six reasons why applied behavior analysts should know about resurgence. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de La Conducta, 41(2), 252–268.
Vegas, K. C., Jenson, W. R., & Kircher, J. C. (2007). A single-subject meta-analysis of the effectiveness of time-out in reducing disruptive classroom behavior. Behavioral Disorders, 32(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290703200204.
Zabel, M. K. (1986). Timeout use with behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 12(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874298601200110.
Author Note
This study was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a bachelor’s degree by the first author, under the supervision of the second and third authors.
Code Availability
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants
The study was approved by the University Institutional Review Board.
Informed Consent
All participants completed an informed-consent process and provided consent prior to participation.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(PDF 137 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houchins, A.L., Williams, C.L. & St. Peter, C.C. Time-Out During Alternative Reinforcement Does Not Reduce Resurgence: An Exploratory Study. Psychol Rec 72, 325–330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00455-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00455-6